That is what “back to the real material object” means to me. There has been too much airy-fairy game-playing going on among intellectuals, and the real world has not become healthier.
Tuesday, June 09, 2020
What “back to the real material object” means
If Heidegger was interested more in the world of becoming than in being, and if for him Dasein is human
nature and exists in the realm of time, and if he could go further
and say that Godhood or Being is also in the realm of true material
being, which is evolved to in the material and supermaterial world,
then I could affirm Heidegger. But as far as I can see he does not
affirm these things.
That is what “back to the real material object” means to me. There has been too much airy-fairy game-playing going on among intellectuals, and the real world has not become healthier.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment