Friday, June 12, 2020
Deeper modern myth-religion is required (from 2013)
Old and new myths grew out
of human nature and the needs of survival and reproduction in often
harsh environments. If we connect mythology to sociobiology we can
have a basis for comparison.
For example, Joseph
Campbell complained about how the patriarchal myths of the Hebrews
and Aryans subjugated the old Goddess myths, but human nature as
defined by sociobiology
was represented in both mythologies. In the Goddess myths differences
in gender remained, men tended to be hunters and warriors, women were
gatherers and nurturers, men were men, women were women, and so on,
with few exceptions, not unlike the patriarchal mythologies.
Particular environments and ethnic peculiarities determined the
emphasis, balance, and differences in myth.
It is modern myths
that conflict with both ancient mythology and sociobiology. In modern
mythology who rules? The politically correct or culturally Marxist
media rules. Who are the rebel heroes? Those who object to cultural
Marxism. What represents the divine? The Big Bang? Technology? Who
are the great goddesses and patriarchs? Billionaires and movie stars.
Hedonism rules. Technology rules. Individualism rules. This will not
do. Deeper myth-religion is required.
I say what will rise is
evolutionary religion, which is philosophically and scientifically
based in theological materialism. We are all evolving to Godhood in the cosmos, the
God first seen inwardly by the great religions. This will do, and it
need not have too much conflict with the old mythologies, old
religions, or sociobiology.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment