The progress and change needed in conservatism

Contrary to many conservatives, progress and change does not have to wipe out the norms of order, justice, and freedom if these things are based in real human nature. Real human nature is conservative in being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection. You will notice that conservatism today misses affirming human nature as being ethnocentric, and even xenophobic, and ignores group-selection being the primary unit of selection.

The nineteenth century brought new ideologies which conservative's disproved of, due mainly to the growth of science, but the evolutionary sciences eventually affirmed the view of human nature listed above, which is very much in line with conservatism. But this sociobiological view affirms the biological origin of social behavior which conflicts with the conservative spiritual view of human nature, which is where conservatives need progress and change. But theological materialism says that we evolve in the material world to supermaterial Godhood, so conservatives don't lose religion, they just need progress and change in deepening religion.

The biological origin of our social behavior actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern relativism and the cultural Marxist ideologues. But it also takes some of the virtue-signaling away from conservatives. For example, the biological origin of our social behavior shows us that, given real human nature, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the best political configuration for humans beings to live within.

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be conservatively established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from marauding imperialist and supremacists by federalism, which would be far preferable to radical Marxism or Fascism, or the political dissimulations based on present flawed definitions of human nature within unworkable multicultural (multi-ethnic) societies.

This progress and change conflicts not only with the spiritual view of human nature but conflicts with the ruling political correctness of cultural Marxism, so this progress and change will require some courage to materialize.