Both the ideologues and the conservatives need to recheck their absolutes

Conservative's slam ideologues and ideologies for having unbending “absolute political truths” (Kirk) which societies must tilt toward or contort to even when the absolutes don't relate to human nature, but conservative's have their own unbending absolutes that don't relate to real human nature, mostly in religious philosophy.

So as the West (and East?) evolve toward the natural political configuration of ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, both the ideologues and the conservatives will need to recheck their absolutes to see if they line up with real human nature and the biological origin of social behavior, which biologically and genetically primarily seeks to advance kin, related ethnic group, locality and nation.

Misinformed “absolute” political and religious truths, like socially advocating the removal of natural differences among people---equality under God and cultural Marxist equality---are used by both conservatives and modern liberals to ignore or block natural differences among people and the advance of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

But radical liberals were wrong and conservatives were right to insist that institutions develop over centuries organically and so change should be gradual. Ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates should develop legally within the system and not with radical revolutions which are rarely successful long term and very damaging. Ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from marauding imperialist and supremacists by federalism.