Michelle Obama proved once again that she is largely ignorant of real human nature in a recent speech in Chicago

Like her food-obsessed friend Oprah, Michelle Obama proved once again that she is largely ignorant of real human nature in a recent speech in Chicago, where she blamed “white flight” on evil white racism. But since all her heroes in the civil rights movement were also largely ignorant of real human nature her condescending matriarchal speech was understandable.

White flight is not just because human nature is biologically and genetically ethnocentric, which has been established in evolutionary sciences like sociobiology---explaining why people tend to prefer to live in neighborhoods of their own kind who share the same gene pool and same culture---white flight is also because of the crime rate in black neighborhoods. Though blacks are 24 percent of New York City’s population, they committed 68.5 percent of all murders, rapes, robberies, and assaults in the city last year, and the statistics in Chicago are similar. Falling housing prices in white flight neighborhoods should also be mentioned.

The U.S. has spent billions of dollars and tried endless government programs trying to do away with ethnocentric human nature without success. What happens instead is a zero sum game where one race rises at the expense of another, as happened in the Affirmative Action program. It turns out that in advocating an ethnostate for blacks, the Nation of Islam's Louis Farrakhan had a better solution to the race problem than the sainted Martin Luther King.

A real civil rights movement would promote an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, where each ethnostate is protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists---black, white, or brown---by some sort of federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

When the Oprahs and Michelle's get on that band wagon we will have real civil rights for all groups. Don't hold your breath but it will come as surely as human nature exists.

Nietzsche's nihilism can be overcome when Godhood is seen as a naturalistic theological goal

Can we know the ultimate cause, the final cause, or purpose, of all things? We can't have the wisdom that evolved Gods have but we can know the ultimate cause in a general sense. Yet even saying that we can be accused of arrogance or pseudo-philosophy, especially by those who believe that man is fallen from grace and is sinful, or by those who have an exaggerated view of a non-material god, or by those who believe that evolution is totally random and goalless.

For Nietzsche, life seeks power, goalless power, amorally or immorally if need be, or creates its own morality. Theology and metaphysics were a spent force for Nietzsche mainly because Nietzsche dismissed direction and purpose to power and evolution. But when Godhood is seen as a naturalistic and theological goal, the goal of evolution, then biology and theology need not settle for the empty spiritualism that Nietzsche detested. Nature and philosophy can be seen as life materially evolving to Godhood.

Nietzsche at one point wanted philosophy to ally itself with natural science, with what would today be called sociobiology, and Nietzsche thought this would finally do away with God and religion. But with sociobiology, altruism, or being for others, which Nietzsche saw as only weakness, is seen as advancing the power of group survival and reproductive success, with religion helping to bond that altruism.

When sociobiology is seen teleologically then religion re-enters the world. The vitalism and teleology of the activating material will, or Tirips, can save Godhood and religion while affirming the naturalization of philosophy which Nietzsche championed. But we need to affirm that evolution moves inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward higher and higher more effective living forms, all the way up the levels of Godhood.

Nietzsche remains a nihilist, and his preference for naturalism in philosophy doesn't change his nihilism because Nietzsche saw no direction, no order, no goal to evolution, other than amoral, directionless power. This purposelessness seems to be another fiction to replace the old fiction of a material-free, evolution-free spiritualism.

Theology needs to join with a new natural philosophy that sees direction and purpose in material evolution. Godhood becomes the goal of evolution in the philosophy of theological materialism. Nihilism can only be legitimately overcome this way. At this point it is a “faith” that there is no purpose to the will-to-power in evolution, against the faith that there is purpose in evolution. I believe the science which Nietzsche at his best preferred will one day affirm the purpose, direction, and material/supermaterial goal of attaining the supreme survival and reproductive success of Godhood in evolution. This will then give us the best of both faith and reason.

I don't fear the deepest instinct, I consider it sacred, and it needs to be unblocked

Both Nietzsche and Burke wrote of the fear of the instincts and passions when unmediated by reason or morality. Burke feared the deepest instincts if unmediated by traditional religious morality, but Nietzsche wanted to give the instincts and passions more free Dionysian reign.

I think of the deepest passion and deepest instinct as the activating will to Godhood within material life, which I call the “Super-Id,” or “Tirips.” It is the combined instincts seeking to evolve in the material world to supermaterial Godhood, activating within life toward supreme success in survival and reproduction, while also engaged in the ups and downs of outside natural selection and genetic evolution.

The activating Super-Id, or Tirips, is not chaotic or Dionysian and not religiously ascetic, and it is not over-controlling in the paths taken among several determined paths, like a boulder rolling down a mountain.

So I don't fear the deepest instinct, I consider it sacred, and it needs to be unblocked.

Future evolution

Obviously the future evolution of life and specifically human life is a complicated synthesis of human nature, the environment, and the biological origin of social behavior, but first we have to survive, and surviving depends on correctly defining real human nature so we can know which social structures will work best with human nature, that is, which social structures will lead to survival and reproductive success for distinctly different ethnic groups and races now competing on earth.

Raymond Cattell remarked that we seem genetically unadapted to large altruistic societies, yet man has a natural tendency toward tenderness and protectiveness and altruism toward kith and kin. This is one of the biological pillars of the political argument for localism and small ethnostates over large multicultural states: localism and regionalism are the most natural way to hold civilization together with natural altruistic group behavior, and better keep us from the selfish anti-social behavior which happens in large groups.

The latest fashion of machine technology seems to proceed in direct proportion to the devaluation of human biological evolution. I am not against technology but the evolution of biological man needs to be valued higher than the evolution of machines. Technology is only an aid in the evolution of life, even if the restrictions of political correctness (cultural Marxism) make it difficult to say so. Life and evolution need defending. The Great Spiritual Blockade to real Godhood needs to be unblocked.

There is something fishy about “singularity” or machines evolving to be as intelligent as humans. It makes it look like humanity is too scared to advance intelligent humans and beyond, rather than (or as well as) advancing machines. It seems like a cunning bypass of the subject of future genetics because it is a politically incorrect subject and doesn't fit various agendas. We have to get over the abuse of genetics and eugenics of World War II, truly healthy people don't dwell on such negative things as a way of life.

We can use technology to help advance humans, but to become machines and possibly therefore lose future human evolution sounds a bit sick. We seem to be allowing deceitful nerds with media power to determine our future. Let's have a little courage and begin to at least talk about the great evolution of real life toward Godhood, only aided by intelligent machines. It's actually a religious mission.

The future superstructure of genetics and bio-engineering need to rest on the evolutionary base of biology, and not become a new artificial structure without a natural base, arrogantly overlooking the biological origin of social behavior. We can enhance our genetic and biological capabilities endlessly as we evolve toward Godhood, but if we upload ourselves into silicone chips we could end natural evolutionary life, which is a diabolical end.

There seems to be something almost paranoid about those who see racism behind any talk of the improvement of hereditary qualities, which is taken to the point of preferring artificial evolution to biological evolution. A very cynical reading could also see those who wish to stop the evolutionary biological improvement of hereditary qualities as an underhanded way to enhance their own genes, consciously or unconsciously, by stopping the advancement of others.

Ethics can be inferred from evolutionary history (what else?) otherwise we attempt to go beyond nature itself. As Cattell said, this does not mean we will not move beyond the human species---ethnocentrism, for example, is a conservative stopping off place to secure beneficial mutations before moving on to the next stage, the next pause, the next species.

Is there a direction to evolution? The evolutionary process has shown a direction toward higher, more complex, more intelligent, more conscious forms, in spite of occasional backward going and stagnation. Evolution gives us hints of direction so we may aid evolution in the direction it is going, applying the sciences of sociobiology and genetics.

Cattell's “Beyondism” seems to suggest that progress is blind, and he thought we can therefore only speak of “going beyond” what we are. I believe that life and evolution show a religious goal of attaining the supreme survival success of ascending levels of Godhood by way of evolving in the material and supermaterial world, activated from within, and shaped by by natural selection and evolution from without.

 

This means ascending levels of Godhood from man to superman to supermaterial Gods and not a transcendence from material life to non-material ''spiritual" life.

We can learn to prevent the decline and early death of a variety of people, ethnic groups, and societies by understanding the social and biological patterns that bring collapse, and by applying voluntary population control and genetics. We can help prevent negative ends, but we can also civilize the beast and seek positive ends, even as we recognize that competition, separation, and distinctiveness are a good thing on the evolutionary path to Godhood.

Theological materialism is thoroughly Western and proud of it

Theological materialism is thoroughly Western and proud of it, following the Western path in centering on science and reason, but emphasizing group-selection as more important than the individualism preferred by the 17^th and 18^th century Enlightenment. And unlike the Enlightenment, theological materialism affirms religious tradition transformed rather than rejected.

I affirm those few westerners who envisioned a religion from science (like the great Raymond Cattell's "Beyondism"). Theological materialism affirms supermaterial Godhood reached by material and supermaterial evolution but conservatively considers the evolutionary Outward Path as an improvement, not a rejection, of the Inward Path to the God within of Traditional religions.

For example, the eastern experience of nirvana, and the beatific experience of heaven or the Father Within of Christ, were just that, a peak experience in the physical mind after much ascetic discipline in blocking or overcoming material desires. We can conservatively retain that preliminary Inward Path experience of the God Within, but it needs to be transformed in the Outward Path of material evolution to real Godhood.

While I respect some of the conclusions of the Traditionalist School of Guénon and Evola---and now Aleksandr Dugin (eg. ethnostatism), the Traditionalist School does not find science (a jewel of the West) nearly as important as Eastern spiritualism (a jewel of the East) and they reject and want to destroy the Western world for its gross materialism. Among American followers of Dugin patriotism is unfairly lost in seeing only the flaws of the West, which are redeemable. For example, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established, legally, in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and money grubbers, by a light federalism.

Theological materialism looks beneath thought and feeling and finds the multifarious processes of the instincts, or Tirips, which activate life to evolve toward the supreme survival success of Godhood. This activation exists within material life and is never separate from it, and works within and adapts to the environments life finds itself living in---there is no spiritual/material duality here. The activation of material life toward evolving to Godhood is the unchanging constant, but values within this basic instinct can conservatively change, as evolution makes new discoveries and presents new challenges as we evolve toward Godhood.

Humans get too far ahead of themselves regarding how free they actually are

Humans are a remarkable species free enough to invent and create, but tending to get too far ahead of themselves regarding how free they actually are. That arrogance may be stimulating in reaching for the stars but it can also be damaging and unfunctional in religious and political philosophy.

Modern liberalism and of course Marxism ignore or overlook the natural genetic and biological talents and restraints of human nature which has caused much suffering in the world. To them the world is divided into classes where the workers are exploited by the capitalists, resulting in class conflicts that ultimately result in socialism/communism with workers owning the means of production, bringing (often violently) a stateless, classless society, with all people being equal.

Modern liberalism and Marxism do not conform to or harmonize with the biological origin of social behavior, or with real human nature, which is genetically and biologically kin and ethnic-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things. Group-selection developed altruism, compassion for others, largely from competing with outside groups which required altruism within groups to be successful against other groups, so group-selection became the central unit of selection, as sociobiologist E. O. Wilson has affirmed.

These natural genetic and biological talents and restraints, if allowed, naturally tend to lead to regionalism, localism, ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. In the U. S. this could be accomplished not by way of radical revolution but through evolutionary conservatism, by adapting, not overturning, the existing constitutional separation of powers and states, and then protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by a light federalism.

I'm not alone in wanting to see civilization return in both high and low culture

I don't believe in the "superiority" of one race or ethnic group over another, but I do believe in racial and ethnic differences (backed by science) which should be applauded and not condemned. And none of us should be forced to accept the destruction of our own people and culture. I'm not alone in wanting to see civilization return in both high and low culture. Distinctive people or ethnic groups make distinctive cultures, and I'm politically incorrect enough to say that is why I believe an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is necessary. Otherwise we will all continue to fall. 

The fall of traditional American popular culture really got going in the 1960's with the rise of African-American performers and Jewish producers. Pop music became much louder and more vulgar, ironically influenced by black gospel music. The musical dynamics of songs were lost and replaced with screaming from the beginning to the end of songs. I'm no prude but subtle romantic themes were replaced by raw sexuality. Dance became imitations of sexual intercourse. And it was  embarrassing to see white performers trying to imitate black performers, even though some of then were quite good at it, like bluesman Eric Clapton. 

This fall of traditional American popular culture continued with Rap and Hip Hop, which was even more Africanized, with rhythm and drumming (and obscene nursery rhymes) virtually replacing melody and harmony. Now even many country music stars act the exact opposite of the old Southern gentleman, full of swaggering arrogance, glorifying drunkenness and promiscuity---frankly, acting like Black rappers. 

When I say "gentleman" I'm not talking about a simpering over-civilized fop, I am talking about the old gentry, with good manners and a fighting spirit, a balance between the warrior and a cultured gentleman---which they still might teach in some military schools in the South. 

If vulgarized pop music and hip hop culture had their own independent state I doubt if I would have much to say about it, but they have been widely promoted in the whole country by the big and small media and have taken over popular culture the way Europe was taken over by barbarians in the Dark Ages---back then it took over a thousand years to turn the barbarians back into European gentlemen.

During this same time “high” European art and culture was virtually replaced in our colleges and universities by the political correctness of cultural Marxism, and it was again embarrassing to see traditional professors trying to imitate Marxist professors, even though some of then were quite good at it.

The Big Media promoted constant attacks against the traditional American people and traditional American culture in music, movies, and television, portraying the ethos of the Euro-American gentleman as foolish or even as evil. Most of the producers of this junk were, and are still, from New York or Los Angeles and could care less about the rest of the county. 

Who benefits from this destruction of Western high and low culture? Modern liberalism slightly disguised as cultural Marxism is a front for the will-to-power and dominance of some individuals and some ethnic groups over other ethnic groups. I see an ethnopluralism of ethnostates as the only healthy and rational way to deal with this natural competition, which in multicultural states ends up destroying all cultures and civilizations.

The end-goal that real life is designed for

Josef Pieper writing about the “purely receptive stance toward reality undisturbed by any interruption by the will,” or Thomas Aquinas saying that the human being can only be satisfied by the vision, the beatific vision, of God, or mystics saying that human beings are designed for that vision and nothing less than such an end, has put up a great “spiritual” blockade against material life evolving toward real supermaterial Godhood.

“Interruption” by the will? What about the sacred activation of the material will within life (Tirips) to activate material life to evolve toward success in survival and reproduction which eventually leads to supermaterial Godhood (from the frogs to the Gods), always working within outside evolutionary selection and in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat? That Godhood is the end-goal that real life is designed for.

Even so, the ascetic Inward Path can be conservatively retained in the Twofold Path as the first inward glimpses of the Outward Path of material life evolving to real supermaterial Godhood, just as both conservatism and material evolution retain the best of the past even as they change.

The biological foundation of beauty, truth, and goodness

The material evolution of life toward Godhood supplies the standard of beauty and morality missing from the stark will to power. That is the answer to the relativity of values of the nihilistic avant-garde and postmodernism.

The lower needs of life join the higher needs of life in the material evolution of life from the frogs to the gods. Dualities are not necessary, such as the split between the material and the so-called spiritual.

Godhood is reached through material and supermaterial evolution engaged in reproduction and survival as life rises to the highest beauty and truth possible in the cosmos. Beauty has a biological imperative. Recovering beauty means recovering the beautiful object as sacred, not merely the idea of beauty. The object needs to be redeemed from the definition of the object.

The zenith of beauty is defined as the zenith of material evolution, which is supermaterial Godhood. This is not a God merely of ideas, and not a non-material God. Moral and aesthetic definitions only secondarily follow the living, evolutionary, material. The Ancient Greeks had it right symbolizing in their art work the Gods/Goddesses as the highest human beauty.

The material evolution of life toward supermaterial Godhood brings the biological origin of life back to culture and politics, suggesting natural separations of people and ethnostates for all groups to fit the mainly kin and ethnic-centered human nature.

As we become more conscious of our real human nature within evolving nature and the biological foundation of beauty, truth, and goodness, we can help life evolve toward Godhood. The now popular enhancement of artificial intelligence (AI) should be seen as only a tool or aid to the eugenic biological evolution of life for all groups; AI should and not be the sole goal of evolution as it is today.

The reduction that relates to the reality of human nature and human history

Traditional conservative's attack libertarians for being attached to one solitary principle (personal freedom is everything), but conservatism is also based on one principle (an invisible God proscribed a transcendent non-material moral order). Both are mistaken reductions.

But there is a reduction that relates to the reality of human nature and human history which was gradually understood over time by the evolutionary sciences, and it is the biological origin of social behavior, which includes religions.

The biological origin of social behavior finds group selection at the origin of altruism because being for others was and is successful in survival and reproduction, and religion's developed to bond the successful moral order of group selection, which doesn't suggest the first principles of traditional conservatism or libertarianism.

The group selection origin of altruism conflicts with the first principle of libertarian individual freedom, and the transcendent first principle of human equality under God, because the altruism of being for others applies mainly to the survival and reproductive success of kin and ethnic group who share the same gene pool.

The biological origin of social behavior points beyond traditional conservatism and libertarianism toward evolutionary conservatism, which naturally suggests regionalism, localism, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by some sort of federalism. And in religion the biological origin of social behavior suggest that we can indeed “immanentize the eschaton” (see theological materialism) and attain real supermaterial, not spiritual, Godhood within nature by way of material evolution. But we also need to affirm that evolution moves inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward higher and higher more effective living forms, all the way to Godhood.

There is no invisible non-material world of essences

The “immediate needs of life” which the mystics say we must look past to see the “essences” do “say it all” if we include the taboo biological origin of social behavior, which includes religion.

There is no real invisible non-material world of essences reserved only for “un-bourgeois” ascetic mystics and philosophers to see, as German Catholic philosopher Josef Pieper and thinkers all the back to the Vedas and Plato claimed.

The same will to life, which includes the “bourgeois” drive to survival and reproductive success, drives material evolution toward supermaterial Godhood, the real Godhood.

Calling the immediate concern for material interests and social respectability insignificant compared to the invisible world of essences, or calling the ascetic blocking of material drives to experience the God within “un-bourgeois,” attacks real life even deeper than Marx did, and deeply demeans the path of material evolution to real supermaterial Godhood.

The term “evolutionary conservatism” indicates the way change and conservatism are viewed

I prefer the term “evolutionary conservative” to “conservative revolutionary.” The term evolutionary conservatism indicates the way change and conservatism are viewed, and evolution tends to keep the best of the past even as it adapts changes, which the word revolutionary doesn't suggest. For example, the human body retained the reptilian and limbic brain as the new frontal neo-cortex was evolved.

Human nature evolved to be conservative, kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection. These traits were genetically added and then retained or conserved over many millenniums because they were successful in survival and reproduction.

Evolutionary conservatism predicts that multicultural multi-ethnic states will eventually adapt to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates as the best political configuration to live within, given real human nature. In the U. S. this can best be accomplished not by way of radical revolution but through adapting---not overturning---the existing constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by a light federalism.

Being is becoming, never static, never absolute, always materially evolving toward Godhood, while keeping the best of the past.

Lies and disinformation rule politics and culture now more than ever

The Trump pullout of troops from Syria is one more action that leaves American's wondering who and what to believe. Who benefits in the short term, or in the long term? It is very difficult to see, especially when the media who report on these thing is full of lies and disinformation. When a cease fire is broken between combatants we don't even know who broke it, it be could be broken by an outside party, false flag operations disguising the actual source of responsibility have become common. It seems like the normal world of our nation and culture has morphed into the lies and disinformation world of intelligence agencies.

How did this happen? It seems like when the old warrior code was more prevalent among our leaders with the certain virtues of courage, honor, loyalty, integrity and selflessness, we had fewer lies and disinformation in the culture---the fall of religious virtues had less to do with it. And lies and disinformation seem to be more prevalent among non-warrior people and non-warrior cultures who often attack the warrior code.

I don't want to sound naive about the world, of course warriors also use lies and disinformation, but they use it in war against the enemy and not among their own people...Perhaps when a nation and culture becomes diverse with competing ethnic groups then lies and disinformation naturally become more prevalent in the culture. That is one more reason ethnostates, and ideally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, are the best political configuration for kin-centered and ethnic-centered human beings to live within. In any case, lies and disinformation are now ruining our politics and culture.

We are being ruled by a swamp of unelected permanent bureaucrats joined with lobbies and the media who do not operate on behalf of the people

Do democracies inevitably end up being ruled by a swamp of unelected permanent bureaucracts joined with lobbies and the media? That is what has happened in the U.S.. The government no-longer operates on behalf of the people but on behalf of the unelected permanent bureaucracy. They are the ones who brought down President Nixon and are now in the process of bringing down President Trump, mainly because those presidents tried to overcome them. They use any means to maintain their power over presidents and elected members of congress, they even use the intelligence services in their schemes. And the corrupt media is their best weapon.

So what can we do about it? Do we abandon democracy as the communists and fascists did? No, we conservatively try to bring the system back to the real American constitutional separation of powers and states. But more than that, we need to bring our culture and government back in harmony with real human nature, which is primarily kin and ethnic-centered whether we like it or not. This suggest that we fix our degenerated democracy which is now crowded with increasingly hostile competing ethnic groups, by adapting the constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by a light federalism. 

That is a better solution than being ruled by a swamp of unelected permanent bureaucrats joined with lobbies and the media, and a better solution than communism or fascism which do not operate on behalf of the people.

The biological origin of social behavior evolved a human nature that is very conservative

By affirming the deepest level of conservatism as the result of the biological origin of social behavior, we can affirm conservatism while rejecting the big government totalist state, and individualistic (hedomistic) libertarianism, but we can also affirm real conservatism while rejecting the spiritually defined transcendent moral order but retaining the religious moral order of theological materialism, which sees Godhood as attained by way of material evolution.

Bitter arguments over what is “conservative" and what is “ideology” usually have conservative's denying that conservatism is not founded on abstract ideas. But nothing is more abstract and ideological than the airy spiritualism which grounds conservatism.

The biological origin of social behavior evolved a human nature that is very conservative. Human nature is biologically and genetically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection or ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. What could be more conservative than that?

This strongly suggests that an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the best political configuration for humans beings to live within. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be conservatively established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by a light federalism.

Let's hope we can get on with it.

The Unbalanced Inward Path

The great mono-myth religions are all Inward Path, salvation is always inward. Their aim is to be “right ordered” toward the Inward Path to the Father Within. But that is an unbalanced order because it ignores the Outward Path of evolution to real Godhood.

Becoming one with the Father Within is not the same as becoming Godhood in outward material/supermaterial evolution.

The Inward Path to the Father Within is usually done by way of strict ascetic discipline in ridding the body of material desires. But Godhood, not the Father Within, is the goal of the Outward Path attained by way of material/supermaterial evolution.

Exclusively centering on the Inward Path usually demeans the real world and sets up a great spiritual blockade against evolving to real Godhood which requires material/supermaterial evolution.

The right ordered religious way to Godhood needs to enthusiastically include the aid of material science, art, politics, etc. without the unbalanced condemnation of the mono-myth religions. In the conservative combined order of the Twofold Path the Father within points toward Godhood which requires outward material/supermaterial evolution.

Bach's beautiful religious totality

Johann Sebastian Bach is the best composer of religious music, his melodies, intertwined harmony, and counterpoint, using all the keys, creates a beautiful religious totality. Bach's works can easily join the modern world of cosmology, mathematics, and even the polyphony of the Xs and Os of computer coding. Listening to Bach on Sunday I thought how well his music would affirm the religious philosophy of theological materialism and the projected Theoevolutionary Church.

But if Bach is the archetype we need modern composer with the courage not only to write in that polyphonic style but the nerve to try to surpass Bach. Romantics like Chopin write beautiful music but it seems more for the individual than the group. Jazz can be very moving too but it is usually too hedonistic. Most modern "classical" composers usually have no religious sense and no moral grounding, they don't create “music” they create pieces formed and written as abstract objections to traditional music.

Both the ideologues and the conservatives need to recheck their absolutes

Conservative's slam ideologues and ideologies for having unbending “absolute political truths” (Kirk) which societies must tilt toward or contort to even when the absolutes don't relate to human nature, but conservative's have their own unbending absolutes that don't relate to real human nature, mostly in religious philosophy.

So as the West (and East?) evolve toward the natural political configuration of ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, both the ideologues and the conservatives will need to recheck their absolutes to see if they line up with real human nature and the biological origin of social behavior, which biologically and genetically primarily seeks to advance kin, related ethnic group, locality and nation.

Misinformed “absolute” political and religious truths, like socially advocating the removal of natural differences among people---equality under God and cultural Marxist equality---are used by both conservatives and modern liberals to ignore or block natural differences among people and the advance of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

But radical liberals were wrong and conservatives were right to insist that institutions develop over centuries organically and so change should be gradual. Ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates should develop legally within the system and not with radical revolutions which are rarely successful long term and very damaging. Ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from marauding imperialist and supremacists by federalism.

Godhood, religion, and moral end-goals remain, but without demeaning life or the material evolution to those goals

The arrogance of traditional religious philosophy is to believe that the human intellect (which some call spirit ) can grasp the “totality” of things, which defined the goal of philosophy for them, that is, to see the world by transcending the world to experience the “spiritual” world of God.

I see the goal of philosophy as seeing the ongoing process of life activated by deepest sacred drive of life, which essentially is the biological origin of social behavior, and that activation has the material goal of evolving life all the way to Godhood, within the ups and downs of natural evolutionary life. Evolution moves inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward higher and higher more effective living forms, all the way to Godhood, where grasping the “totality” of things may be possible, but beyond the reach of the present human species.

So Godhood, religion, and moral end-goals remain, but without demeaning life or the material evolution to those goals. Thomas Aquinas got the goal right when he said the goal of human beings is to attain the likeness of God, but he got it wrong when he said to attain the likeness of God an un-material soul must separate from the material body. It is not a non-material soul or or spirit that brings us to a non-material Godhood, the sacred material drive of life brings us to super-material Godhood by way of material evolution, and the great task is to help it along its way.

Dealing with the fascist “antifa” movement

The title of the left-wing militant group “antifa” is a lie in claiming to be anti-fascist when they themselves are fascist in trying to violently close down the free speech rally in Minneapolis last night for President Trump. But lies are the basis of the postmodern nonsense they were taught in our colleges and universities, the lie that all truth is relative and is only the will to power, so lies can be used to obtain power. They don't seem to care that it makes their own truth a relative truth.

Vying for power is not wrong but when power is used for causes, like Marxism, which reject the biological origin of social behavior and damage the true and natural process of successful survival and reproduction, even for the liars, then it is wrong.

Let the antifa fools have their free rallies, but the very first sign of them using violence to try to shut down the freedom of speech of another group, arrest them all and throw them in jail, even if the army is needed to help the police. And don't allow amoral lawyers to manipulate the laws in favor of the fascist antifa.

If we can't do that then the amoral and immoral will to power of lies and liars will destroy us.

Will traditional American culture will be voted out of existence?

Taki Theodoracopulos said, “Big Brother turned out to be the media.” (Chronicles, May 2019). The far left and the schools call the tune and all the media is their loudspeaker. They are radically against everything traditional white American culture stands for, showing constant hostility toward priests, families, cops, and soldiers. Virtually all criminals are now depicted as white and blond, contrary to crime statistics. It is a reverse anti-white racism.

What can we do about this takeover and destruction of American culture? Demographics, statistical data relating to the population and particular groups within it, tell us that in a democracy with open borders where non-whites will soon be a majority, where whites are dying faster than being born, and where the far left, the schools, and the media are all hostile toward traditional white Americans, then traditional American culture will be voted out of existence.

Is this the end of traditional white American culture? The far left, the schools and all the media sure hope so. But there is a way to survive that doesn't involve radical civil war or ethnic war, and which includes fair treatment for all groups.

The biological origin of social behavior and real kin and ethnic-centered human nature lead naturally to regionalism, localism, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. How much healthier people would be if they could celebrate who they really are in their own ethnostate, protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by some form of limited federalism. These vital changes can be done legally, adapting the U.S. constitutional separation of powers and states to ethnostates.

Otherwise it looks likes whites and traditional white American culture are doomed.

Defining evolutionary conservatism: Trump has been battling against both the greed and amorality of the globalist capitalist monster and the naively stupid modern liberals

It is true that Western free enterprise capitalism almost miraculously has brought much of the world out of poverty, but now with China we are in the process of seeing whether the globalist capitalist monster which free enterprise capitalism has become can curb their greed and amorality. The global capitalist's became rich with the great Chinese buildup of the dictatorial communist military industrial complex now threatening the West. China is or soon will be a bigger threat to the West than Soviet Russia was; the Chinese, especially the northern Chinese, have high IQ's and their ethics have not been much weakened by decadent Western liberalism.

President Trump has been battling against both the greed and amorality of the globalist capitalist monster and the naively stupid modern liberals. Trump is trying to restore the original economic nationalism of free enterprise capitalism, which ironically was used by China in its rise to power, but which China is now turning into the same globalist capitalist monster that destroyed the West---even high IQ's can be seduced by amoral greed.

But the standard Burkian/Kirkian paleoconservatism, though far superior to globalist neoconservatism, is not enough to save the West from the globalist capitalist monster or the Chinese military industrial complex. If the purpose of a conservative statesman and politician is to be prudent and to keep the peace then---given kin and ethnic-centered human nature---we will eventually need to return to the realism of regionalism, localism, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by some sort of federalism and economic nationalism. This necessary change, which can come from adapting the U. S. constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, defines evolutionary conservatism. And China would do well to do the same thing.

The material evolution to Godhood in the Outward Path transforms the “spiritual” Inward Path

Christian religious philosopher's see a “series of worlds” (Josef Pieper) from the world of plants, etc. to the highest world seen as the “totality of being,” which religious philosophers defined as the “spirit” where the spiritual totality of being “transcends” the material world. The problem with that is that the totality of being is a peak material inward experience usually experienced after much ascetic blocking of material desires, and does not transcend the material world. This doesn't mean a rejection of the Inward Path experience of the totality of being, it just doesn't define it as spirituality, it defines the Twofold Path, where the material evolution to Godhood in the Outward Path transforms the “spiritual” Inward Path.

The series of worlds or life forms materially evolved from the awareness of a frog seeing a fly, to the intelligence of humans who can see a totality of being, but then projects on to the world of materially evolving super-beings, with life eventually evolving to Godhood. As Cattell suggested, evolution moves inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern have a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward higher and higher more effective living forms, all the way to the Godhood, which is defined in theological materialism.

When we look at long-term evolution what is important in choosing wives and husbands?

Do women judge the status of men as more important than looks perhaps knowing that their children will have a better chance in life with a high status husband? This would happen a bit less now with more independent working women. And young women seem less class conscious and looks tend to be rated higher with them than status---but this changes as women get older. And high status people often choose beauty over status and low status people often choose status over beauty. When we look at long-term evolution what is important in choosing wives and husbands?

In the long term, group selection has been more successful than individual selection. As Raymond Cattell and Edward Wilson have said, evolution proceeds ultimately by natural selection among groups, which determines and is determined by natural selection among individuals, genetically and culturally. The only ultimate test of the fitness and progress of a group's culture-genetic make-up is whether it survives, historically.

As Wilson put it: "Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals." Cattell believed that the key to evaluating the individual and the group was for society to have a way to understand the difference between socially gifted work and anti-socially gifted work. Cattell sees survival to be as dependent on genetic as cultural bases, and one change of present values indicated is in a more enthusiastic pursuit of eugenics. This involves the acceptance of genetic individual differences, without envy or malicious obstruction, and of better education for the gifted.

Cattell sees two kinds of cultural developments : p-culture" which adapts as outlets for our frustrations, as in poetry, music, and drama, and "r-culture" which actually fits us to the environment, as in engineering, medicine, and science. P-culture may be training for r-culture, as well as for temporary emotional adjustment; but it is primarily by r-culture that we survive.

Ultimately our sexual choices will be or should be affected by these traits.

Ideas are expressions of the biological origin of social behavior

Ideas are expressions of the biological origin of social behavior related to whatever field the ideas are presenting. This includes the ideas of religion, philosophy, politics, art, etc, which usually define the moral superiority of their causes. Ideas often mask the will to life of biology. But the idea of the biological origin of social behavior obviously does does not mask the biological origin of social behavior. 

We can indeed immanentize the eschaton, attain Godhood directly within nature and evolution, when we affirm that evolution moves inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward higher and higher more effective living forms, all the way to Godhood. 

Affirming the biological origin of social behavior is an antidote to the abstractions not only of 19^th and 20^th century ideologies but to conflicting religious claims of moral superiority. This does not lead to radical revolution as the 19^th and 20^th century ideologies and as old religions often did, it leads to better understanding the reality of human nature living and competing in the world. 

Human nature IS ethnocentric and racialist and has been since humans became humans. Group-selection was the only way for individuals to successfully survive, so altruism, or being for others, was naturally limited mainly to kin and ethnic group because they shared the same genes which strive for survival. Trying to rid human nature and culture of the deep-seated preference for kin and ethnic group, which is attempted by many ideologies and religions, is like trying to rid human beings of being human. That is inhumane and cruel. 

This strongly suggests that the biological origin of social behavior and real human nature lead naturally to regionalism, localism, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by some sort of federalism. This defines evolutionary conservatism. 

All groups can then get on better with the natural business of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates and aiding our evolution to real Godhood.

Transforming the old Inward Path of asceticism

If the “spirit” is defined as the power of comprehending the totality of being, as the old philosophers and as Josef Pieper say it is, it would then take the non-material out of the picture as well as the idea that God is spiritual.

As I see it, the totality of being is evolutionary and material or supermaterial and is never non-material or spiritual, and we will have to evolve much higher intelligence to see the the true totality of being that the evolved Gods see. We evolve from frogs to Gods and we have a long way to go.

And that's the point here, our traditional religious definitions of spiritualism and God as non-material, and defining the spiritual as comprehending the totality of being, have been blocking the process of material evolution to real Godhood, which we should be aiding.

Total being means materially evolving to supermaterial Godhood and to beings of eternal life, but evolutionary and material life might then go on evolving to higher levels of Godhood and higher levels of eternity.

We can think of the non-material ideas and experiences of the spirit and of God as preliminary attempts to comprehend the totality of being. The old Inward Path of asceticism can be retained but transformed in the Outward Path of material evolution to supermaterial Godhood.

Bonding problems on the left and the right

1. We can't successfully bond one distinctive ethnic ethos and agenda to another distinctive ethnic group. 2. We can't successfully bond multi-ethnic or multicultural societies to one ethnic ethos and agenda. 3. The ethos and agenda of democracies breaks down due to demographic changes in voting ethnic groups, especially with open national borders. 4. We can't successfully block the biological origin of human nature (why would we want to?) which is genetically kin-centered, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection, among other conservative traits.

As the consequence of this reality in the U. S. the democratic left has become a party mainly for promoting minority ethnic groups and races, and the republican right mainly promotes whites, and the increasing clashes between them naturally makes social harmony un-bondable. This explains the origin of most of the problems in the West today.

Given human nature, if we want democracies (or any political system) to work as harmoniously as possible we need to develop ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by some form of federalism. This can be done in the U.S. by slightly adapting the constitutional separation of powers and states. But since the schools, the media, the political parties, the business world, and most of the people indoctrinated by the schools and the media now object to this solution, who can say when it will happen? Even so, I believe it will emerge.

The deep changes eventually needed on the right

History repeats itself because human nature and the natural world have remained basically the same since humans became humans, although history repeats itself not precisely but with variations.

The right (and of course the left) need to eventually understand that human nature remains basically the same for all groups, that is kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, territorial, and even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

Consequently I think American patriots will need to eventually adapt the U.S. constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions, protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by a light federalism.

Conservatives as well as the traditionalist school will need to stop rejecting the material world in favor of non-material spiritual cycles which always end up with non-material spiritual utopias that reject or demean the material world, and they will need to accept that the Godhood they speak so much of in reality is reached in the natural world through material and supermaterial evolution.

Aryan noble supremacists and Jewish chosen supremacists will need to reject supremacism and accept an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which is the civilized and realistic way to survive in the crowded world, and then not use their ethnostates as staging areas for meddling or marauding in other peoples territories.

Some of these changes on the right will likely have to wait for inflexible generations to pass, and I believe the changes need to be made conservatively and legally within the system and not by way of radical revolution.

The progress and change needed in conservatism

Contrary to many conservatives, progress and change does not have to wipe out the norms of order, justice, and freedom if these things are based in real human nature. Real human nature is conservative in being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection. You will notice that conservatism today misses affirming human nature as being ethnocentric, and even xenophobic, and ignores group-selection being the primary unit of selection.

The nineteenth century brought new ideologies which conservative's disproved of, due mainly to the growth of science, but the evolutionary sciences eventually affirmed the view of human nature listed above, which is very much in line with conservatism. But this sociobiological view affirms the biological origin of social behavior which conflicts with the conservative spiritual view of human nature, which is where conservatives need progress and change. But theological materialism says that we evolve in the material world to supermaterial Godhood, so conservatives don't lose religion, they just need progress and change in deepening religion.

The biological origin of our social behavior actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern relativism and the cultural Marxist ideologues. But it also takes some of the virtue-signaling away from conservatives. For example, the biological origin of our social behavior shows us that, given real human nature, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the best political configuration for humans beings to live within.

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be conservatively established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from marauding imperialist and supremacists by federalism, which would be far preferable to radical Marxism or Fascism, or the political dissimulations based on present flawed definitions of human nature within unworkable multicultural (multi-ethnic) societies.

This progress and change conflicts not only with the spiritual view of human nature but conflicts with the ruling political correctness of cultural Marxism, so this progress and change will require some courage to materialize.

The suicidal side of paying millions to athlete-gladiators

I enjoy both amateur and professional sports, and I believe in meritocracy, selecting people on the basis of their ability, but I also see the quickening pace to emulate the fall of the Roman Empire in mostly white American's paying mostly black professional athlete-gladiators multi-millions of dollars each, which gives them a great advantage over non-gladiators in the survival and reproduction competitions in which whites are no-longer breeding faster than dying.

Apparently that was not enough. Now suicidal white politicians in California and other benighted states want to pay millions to mostly black amateur college athlete-gladiators---apparently a totally free “scholarship” ride through college was not enough in the competitions for cheerleaders, etc.

No thought is given to paying millions to, say, those in engineering, medicine, and science, who happen to be mostly white, and who actually help human's survive, including black athlete-gladiators. The athlete-gladiator circus games must go on, which keeps the population from understanding the suicidal side of paying millions to athlete-gladiators.

They are turning unsuspecting whites into cuckolds, keeping us all ignorant of the biological origin of our social behavior by way of the cultural Marxist indoctrination in the media and in all our schools.

In the end, social and cultural judgment has to come down to choosing socially, culturally, biologically, and genetically responsible behavior and not choosing anti-social, anti-cultural, anti-biological, anti-genetic behavior, based on sound sociobiologically knowledge of the biological origin of our social behavior.