Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Conservatism considered hedonistically
When morality, ethics and political
ideas are not working, conservatives can talk in pleasure/pain terms: do
you want more pleasure or less? Thinking strictly in strategies of pleasure/pain, conservatism offers
more over-all pleasure in the long-term, and progressivism offers
more short-term pleasure. It's like diet strategies, there is
short-term pleasure in eating sugars and high glycemic carbs, but
there is more pleasure overall in staying fit and trim by not eating
such things. Emphasizing the pleasure rather then
the sacrifice makes good sense, especially for pleasure-seeking people.
Young people and immature cultures tend
to think in terms of short-term pleasures, which is why they tend to
need guidance regarding where the most long-term pleasure comes from.
Young people like to claim that conservative societies are closed
and not open to new things, but real conservative societies
understand that the new must be brought into the old, gradually, in
small doses, so as not to overwhelm and cause more pain than
pleasure.
Conservatism offers very hard won
wisdom based on the long-term experiences of large groups of people who have
seen it all and know what ends up causing more pain and pleasure in
the long-term. Progressivism tends not to want to see the long-term,
so painful mistakes are made. Someone said that every new generation (and new immigration?)
is a revolution which must be understood and synthesized by
conservatives, or society will fall apart in continual revolutions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment