Thursday, December 13, 2018
The price we pay for the long-sought-for realistic synthesis of the fields
“A theory is
more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise, the
more different are the kinds of things it relates to, and the more
extended its range of applicability.” Einstein
I think
sociobiology supersedes philosophy, but also every other field.
Nietzsche thought psychology supplanted philosophy, but now
sociobiology supplants psychology---the term "evolutionary
psychology" seems redundant.
But I think
religion can take back the king/queen position by way of the
philosophy of theological materialism, which affirms and expands the
biological origin of social behavior with the material evolution to
supermaterial Godhood. This long-sought-for extensive synthesis
requires seeing evolution moving inevitably in a pattern, which
virtually every scientist (and religionist) rejects. Even though it
has its random elements, the pattern of evolution has a discernible
direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward
higher and higher more effective living forms.
Scientist
Francis Heylighen wrote that "it is assumed that evolution is
largely unpredictable and contingent on a host of uncontrollable
factors, which may steer its course in any of an infinite number of
directions. However, it is noted that directions in which complexity
increases are generally preferred...The net effect will tend to be
that the new ecosystem, formed by environment together with the newly
added system (parasite, cave fish, aquatic mammal, etc.) will become
more complex than it was before the appearance of the simplified
system... ("The
Growth of Structural and Functional Complexity during Evolution”)
The goal of
evolving to Godhood need not deprive us of either science or
religion. Defining the inward material activation of life (Tirips) as evolving
toward higher and higher forms and eventually to Godhood, while
always being shaped by natural outside evolution, seems to be a bit
further than most people want to go, but I go there. Affirming this
drive and direction is the price we pay for a long sought-for
realistic synthesis of
the fields.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment