Saturday, December 22, 2018
Plot/determinism, character/free will, and the primary force of life
If we compare free will
and genetic determinism to the way Aristotle thought of the
subordination of character to plot in tragedies, the extreme free
will/character folks tend to block the determinist/plot folks, and
the determinist/plot folks tend to block the free will/character
folks. We don't want to see plot destroy character or character
destroy plot or we end up with a drama that doesn't congeal.
The challenge is to define
which is primary and which is secondary when, as E. O. Wilson said,
there is a co-evolution.
Since genetic
determinism/plot is the final arbiter, which keeps human nature on a
biological leash, I say determinism/plot is primary and free
will/character is secondary. We cannot block either out no matter how
intellectually clever we are.
Even so, I think Nietzsche
chose a secondary force when he made the will to power the primary
force of his later philosophy. Darwin was closer in making survival
and reproduction his primary force.
I think the material activation
within material life (Tirips) that seeks the zenith of success in survival
and reproduction, which defines Godhood, is the deeper primary force
activating those other forces that seek power and survival for the
primary ultimate purpose of attaining Godhood, while working along
with outside natural selection and evolution.
The pleasures of eating
and sex are not end-goals but means to survival and reproductive
success, and survival and reproductive success is not the end-goal
but the means to the primary goal of evolving toward the zenith of
those drives, which is Godhood.
This definition can exhume
and transform religion as primary, while certainly including science.
It gives a goal to Nietzsche's relativistic power drive, and creates
values for value-free science.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment