What have they done to America?

Who are “they?” Aside from the monopolistic global business world, and crony capitalism with its all powerful lobbies, and the very destabilizing immoral media, it is also the politicians who are largely bought and controlled by these same people.

I think of the Clintons, with Hilary about to run for president. Their political agenda came out of the 1960's, with its hippie counter-culture, its cultural Marxism (political correctness), which is still taught in the colleges and universities where Hilary and Bill were miseducated. That is, they believe that people are all completely equal, the free enterprise system tends to be evil (accept for those capitalist's who give money to liberal causes), they personally think religion is ridiculous, they believe the U.S. needs to educate the rest of the world on every subject, they demand that sexuality of all types needs to be liberated from oppressive tradition, and they think that only big government can solve our problems since the states and the local people---not being properly educated in cultural Marxism---can't be trusted. The fact that these things do not relate in the least to basic human nature was never taught to them. Real human nature developed many thousands of years ago, and even the smallest change in human nature and our DNA structure, for example, in our immune system, tends to take hundreds of thousands of years to change. We remain kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection. This relates more to conservative tradition, whereas cultural Marxism only relates to nature in the general will to power of its advocates.

Nevertheless, the Clinton's are at it again. Personally I don't find Hilary Clinton likable in the least, even her most friendly smiles and delightful bursts of laughter are obviously calculated---this means Hilary isn't a very good actor, and politicians apparently need to be. We certainly do not need Hilary as our president, any more than we needed her husband as president. It is a testimony to the strong influence of the decadent 1960's that their followers didn't throw the Clintons out of public life for Bill's immoral behavior in the oval office, and his many lies about it all. Do we really want a president like that? But it's not likely Hilary will be stopped because she has cozied up to the crony capitalists (talk about phony liberalism) who run the country. But, oddly, many people continue to think they are wonderful human beings.

Is Rand Paul the best we can do as an alternative to Hilary---with Pat Buchanan blocked and grounded by the powers that be? Pat seems to have failed to field a successor. Rand doesn’t share Pat's economic nationalism which is desperately needed to revive and protect the nation and its manufacturing base. But Rand recommends bringing the troops home and largely shutting down the empire, and that is at least a start. But even these men have not dealt with ethnopluralism, that is, the idea that it is okay if the states slowly take on more of the character of the ethnic cultures within the various regions and states, as a realistic way to deal with very disruptive diversity, which will increase, brought on by both the liberals and conservatives and our open borders. Ethnopluralism can harmonize with federalism and the Constitution... Future politicians will have to deal with this.  Meanwhile we have to survive the Clintons.