What's missing in conservatism and needs to be included

Conservatism rightly speaks of human scale culture, nurturing roots, centering on the common good more than commercial gain, and maintaining long established customs and habits, that is, not globalism, or universal cultural formats (see Russell Kirk). But conservative's rarely mention nurturing the roots of ethnic groups at the foundation of culture. Why not?

I think in our time it is lack of courage from fear of being called a “racist” for affirming ethnicity and all the social problems that can come from confronting the prevailing politically correctness of cultural Marxism.

Conservative's affirm natural law and human nature but overlook or downplay the basic parts of human nature that conflict with the politically correctness of cultural Marxism, such as, human nature being ethnocentric, even xenophobic, with group-selection---which usually means ethnic selection---as the primary unit of successful selection---although conservative's readily include human nature as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making and religious-making.

Since group-selection---which usually means ethnic selection---is the primary unit of successful selection, that is a serious omission within conservatism which has driven too many energetic natural conservatives away from conservatism and down radical paths that feature ethnicity and race but overlook or downplay other basic parts of conservative human nature, like maintaining long established customs and habits, and not radical formats.

My kind of conservatism sees that an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the best political configuration for ethnic groups to live within, and needs to be included in conservatism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected from marauding imperialists and supremacists by federalism.

It may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to states and regions to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and it will not be easy at all, but it is far preferable to radical Marxism or Fascism, or the political dissimulations we now have based on flawed definitions of human nature, which have brought us radically destructive civil disruptions, or even civil war, and which are now increasing across the world within unworkable multicultural (multi-ethnic) societies demanding that we all get along...We will all live more naturally, homogeneously, and as harmoniously as is possible in our own ethnostates.