Not being what we are, not
being one with oneself, not being in accord with ones being, is
mainly caused from being taught what we are not, usually in three
ways.
We are taught that
financial success in the world is all, or we are taught that survival
and reproductive success is all, or we are taught that the spiritual
is superior to the material and we should therefore most importantly
look to the non-material spiritual, with the advocates of those
positions claiming that those positions are in the best accord with
what we are. Various cultures have developed around those versions of
not being what we are, of not being one with oneself, or not being in
accord with ones being.
Success in the world
financially is driven by the desire for survival and reproductive
success, but the desire for survival and reproductive success is
driven by the sacred activation to evolve in the material world to
supermaterial Godhood. The non-material spiritual was only the first rudimentary glimpse of the ascending levels of Godhood evolved to in the material world.
Being what we are means
being in accord with nature and with real human nature, which is
basically
kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual,
marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and
religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the
primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual
selection. Cultures are eventually pulled back by that biological and
genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect
real human nature, and humans then work within and adapt to the
environments they find themselves living.
But in the deepest sense of being what we are and being
in accord with ones being is the activation to evolve in the material
world to ascending levels of supermaterial Godhood. Cultures can then
work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living
in and consciously develop from that definition of theological
materialism.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment