Identifying the primary and secondary future intent and pattern of ethics

"Dare to ask terrifying questions, and you may be answered." Russell Kirk

Some truths are constant and fundamental, or primary, and some truths are secondary usually as a result of new and better knowledge coming in from all fields. But without the Twofold Path of theological materialism and without the evolution to supermaterial Godhood we have an incomplete connection to reality.

The primary goal of religion can be attained only through the Evolutionary Outward Path of material evolution to Godhood. The secondary goal of religion is experiencing the traditional symbolic Spirit Within (which is really the material activation of Tirips) obtained through the Involutionary Inward Path of ascetics.

The Twofold Path in the theological materialism of the projected Theoevolutionary Church conservatively retains the old Inward Path of traditional religion as it is transformed in the Outward Path of material evolution to real Godhood.

Secondary conservatism defends fundamental “universal” ethics such as those which help all groups survive, as well as defending “personal” individual ethics which help the individual survive. Primary conservatism affirms specific group ethics, which can help specific groups and ethnic groups survive and evolve. The group is and has been genetically the main unit of evolutionary selection.

We do not have to ignore variety while upholding universal ethics. The principles of subsidiarity and federalism, and the political configuration of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates follow this kind of social philosophy, which unifies universal, specific and personal ethics.

Evolution to Godhood is the primary intent and pattern of ethics. Survival is the natural and secondary test of ethics. We may not reach Godhood unless we learn how to evolve through a secure scientific understanding of our genetic and cultural environments, which is the new scientific social wisdom.

Evolutionary scientists like Raymond Cattell and E. O. Wilson, philosophers like Nietzsche, and maverick historians like Wilmot Robertson mapped out or at least pointed toward many of these insights, but without the Twofold Path of theological materialism.