Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Correcting Nietzsche's error
Friedrich Nietzsche began his career by
writing about the “German Spirit” and how to unblock and revive
it, but as time went on Nietzsche thought that we all need to
transcend the national perspective and affirm only
individual great men, “good Europeans,” and supermen, downplaying
or blocking nationalism.
Nietzsche's rejection of nationalism
was at least to a certain extent related to Wagner's imperial brand
of nationalism, or Wagner's pushy personality which took up all the
oxygen in a room, and perhaps also do to Nietzsche's unfamiliarity or
discomfort with male authority figures, having been raised by women
only. Even great minds can brilliantly rationalize to accommodate
their own weaknesses.
Correcting this error would have required an affirmation of the truths behind
group-selection in the evolution of the human species and human
culture. Supermen need the nation as much as the nation needs
them. It seems to me that Nietzsche might have welcomed new
knowledge from the evolutionary science of sociobiology had he had it.
What needs to be championed is the
evolution and promotion of great men and women along with their
nations, many small nations, ethnostates, with mutually agreed upon natural
differences and natural separations, as we all evolve toward Godhood
in the cosmos, sharing knowledge and information across a variety of
nations. That is a version of "internationalism" we could live with. It seems to me that this is the better version of the new religious ethos
which early Nietzsche did see as necessary to revive the fallen world. God is not dead, Godhood has been insufficiently understood. The Inward Path to the inward God of traditional religion leads to the Outward Path of evolution to Godhood, transformed in the Twofold Path.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment