The belief in dualism of
the conservative spiritualists (Elmer More, Russell Kirk) does not
rightly accept the flow of change and evolution within naturalistic
conservatism, they fear change because they say change has not
revered the spiritual, they say religion will die without the
spiritual and that we will all become hedonists without spiritualism.
Religion does not fall
with the advent of naturalism, religion rises out of ashes of
spiritualism as we materially evolve in the material world to
ascending levels of supermaterial Godhood, natural material evolution
is the path to real Godhood.
Material forces don't
stifle higher civilization they activate civilization, unlike
dualistic spiritualism which often thinks of material forces as
evil (asceticism) and therefore actually stifles civilization.
And natural evolution
tends to be conservative in that it conserves the best of the past
or that which has enhanced survival and reproductive success. The
stability of conservatism in general helps maintain evolutionary new
mutations which would perish without that stability. How much
evolution, the timing of evolution, depends on the circumstances of
the nation, the small states, or ethnostates, within the nation and
the world. “Reasoned and temperate” progress is the general way
of evolution.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment