Sunday, March 15, 2020
Effective revolution or reformation in modern conditions
I
repeat here often that human nature has been affirmed throughout
human history to this day as
being
universally and genetically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded,
heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even
xenophobic, among other conservative things, with group-selection as
the primary unit of successful selection followed by individual
selection.
This
strongly suggests that if
real kin and ethnic-centered human nature is allowed to be what it
is, it would naturally lead to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, eventually
ethnostates, and finally an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates. For example, in the U. S. this could
be accomplished not by way of radical revolution but through
adapting---not overturning---the U.S. constitutional separation of
powers and states, and then protecting the ethnostates from marauding
imperialists, supremacists, and global money grubbers, by a defensive
federalism.
Alan
Bullock said originality lay in the realization that effective
revolutions, in modern conditions, are carried out with and not
against the power of the State: the correct order of events was first to
secure access to that power and then begin revolution.
The
Tenth Amendment says “The
powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States
respectively, or to the people,” which gives the
states the power to nullify unconstitutional laws; it is
a moderate
middle ground, and not the road to secession. If that doesn't open
the way for regions or states to become ethnostates and an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates, then the constitutional separation of
powers and states can be amended to include ethnostates. Radical
revolutions are not called for and are usually unsuccessful, we can conserve the best of the past
as we evolve toward the future.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment