Biologizing culture and ethics

Edward O. Wilson said: "The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool. The brain is a product of evolution. Human behavior...is the circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact. Morality has no other demonstrable ultimate function."

In other memorable lines Wilmot Robertson said "“What is called for is a new form of government that would turn socially destructive into socially constructive forces. Race, now actively tearing countries apart might be helpful in putting them back together again...” (“The Ethnostate”)

But with the contrivances of the corrupt Media and our schools we have been taught to fear the biologizing of culture and ethics to the point where speaking about it has been made unacceptable and taboo. This taboo has been irrationally exploited as much as the idea of “racial supremacy” was irrationally exploited. When the goals of social planning are biologized it leads naturally to ethnostates for all ethnic groups and races.

Human nature remains universally and genetically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection followed by individual selection. When real kin and ethnic-centered human nature is allowed to be what it is, it naturally leads to regionalism, localism, eventually ethnostates, general conservative values, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. 

 

In the U. S. this could be accomplished not by way of radical revolution but through adapting---not overturning---the U.S. constitutional separation of powers and states, and then protecting the ethnostates from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and global money grubbers, with a defensive federalism.