What good is it to become rich if you and your descendants die biologically in doing so?

Watching a Wall Street guru this morning promoting the immigration of high tech people from India or China reminded me of how Wall Street thinkers (along with the left) are killing the golden goose of free enterprise, which has given Americans the highest standard of living in human history. The global Wall Street libertarians have allowed and promoted open border immigration (which the global left also pushes for different reasons) because they believe that free enterprise and money-making are at the origin of human social behavior. While being a great thing, free enterprise is not at the origin of human social behavior, biology is.

When a population of Hispanics, Latinos, South Asians, Indians, Chinese, or Africans immigrate to America they mainly consume their same ethnic foods and speak their same ethnic languages (but usually learn English too) and they keep their same ethnic culture, and for the most part they assimilate only on superficial levels, which is only natural because human nature prefers and selects kin and ethnic group. And so Euro-America slowly or quickly changes to the culture of the immigrants, depending on the speed and number of immigrants and the gradual inter-ethnic breeding that inevitably takes place, and these things change the gene pool which changes the culture, because people create cultures more than cultures create people.

That is why economic nationalism and tariffs, which president Trump has had the courage to promote, makes sense on the biological level, but not to the global Wall Street libertarians who think only of individual money-making liberty.  We need to retain the great free enterprise system but it needs to be moderated by concern for the biological origin of our social behavior; what good is it to become rich if you and your descendants die biologically in doing so?

If Brokow had uttered deeper truths he would have been buried in obscurity

As I watched retired leftist media talking-head Tom Brokow being called a racist and his character assassinated for suggesting that Hispanics and Latinos should learn English to better fit into American society, I wondered if American's might now apologize to the brave souls who have for years been trying to tell Americans that multicultural/multi-ethnic societies don't work. Many Hispanics and Latinos have no intention of assimilating into gringo society, which is completely predicable given kin and ethnic-centered human nature and the preference for group-selection in successful survival and reproduction.

But I know of course that no apology will come to those men and women who have martyred themselves trying to tell a brainwashed public the simple truth that as the people change or as ethnic-groups change, the culture changes, because ethnic-groups are not the same in the cultures they create.

Being a typical American liberal milk-toast, Brokow apologized for telling the truth that language barriers make communication in a society very difficult. Brokow didn't go on to tell the deeper truth that human nature has been affirmed throughout human history as being basically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, territorial, and even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. If Brokow had uttered the deeper truth he would have been buried in obscurity.

But doing nothing brings a better possibility of social disruption and violence. I for one will continue to point toward the legal political/cultural solution---not revolution---that eventually will bring about an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism, although it may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states.

But I know that ethnic disruptions and even civil war are more likely than a peaceful transformation; the corrupt Big Media and the schools are too cunning and have too much of a hold on Americans.

Morals and legal norms are developed from the biological origin of social behavior

According to Honneth, Foucault's view on Nietzsche's will to power was that morals and legal norms are "historical variable superstructures." I disagree, these social superstructures are developed from the biological origin of social behavior, which is "limited" by our biologically derived human nature. Why is that so hard to affirm? In Foucault's case did he push an amoral power force to better allow for the deviant behavior he preferred? Where does integrity come from? Are all philosophies biased by the biography of the philosopher? Philosopher's block truths as readily as do the marauding capitalists they hate.

There is flexibility and freedom within the genetic limits of human nature, but it does not affirm most ideologies. The biological origin of our social behavior actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern relativism, as well as the culturally Marxist ideologues. But it also takes some of the virtue-signaling away from the spiritualism of conservatives.

The reality points toward the political/cultural solution of the an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. This is the sociopolitical/cultural structure most in harmony with real human nature, which developed tens of thousands of years ago and is still with us today. In our increasingly crowded world an ethnopluralism of ethnostates looks like the most equitable and natural way for "us all to get along." The challenge will be in protecting the independence of ethnostates from marauders on the left or the right. That was the challenge the founders of America faced with the Constitutional separation of powers and states, which could be reaffirmed and expanded to ethnostates.

The exploitation of altruistic-empathy is killing us

It's ironic that modern liberals who deny any genetic bases to our social behavior are applying a hypertrophied version of the genetically-derived trait of altruistic-empathy in their multiculturalism or multi-racialism.

Northern Europeans seem prone to this fatal flaw which seems to have developed from what was originally a genetically-derived survival tactic in the harsh climate of the North. The Northern Chinese and Japanese seem free of this hypertrophied suicidal cuckoldry perhaps because the climate they were evolved in was much harsher and more unforgiving than the more moderate climate of, say, Scandinavia.

Scandinavian's seem especially suicidal in opening their borders and their societies to "multiculturalism" or multi-racialism, which has been quickly destroying them in an epidemic of rape, murder and social chaos---the Swedes only smile at this tragedy and make it a crime to object to the suicide.

It has also been absolute evil genius on the part of those in the media and the schools who exploited this white altruistic-empathy in their films, television, and books---they must think we are total fools.

The trait of altruistic-empathy was evolved to successfully advance the genes of kin and ethnic group who shared the same genes, it was not evolved to advance multiculturalism or multi-racialism. We see the tragic consequences of this great mistake/exploitation in the biological and cultural destruction of the Western world now taking place...

The only way I can see back to biological, psychological, cultural, and social health is to return to natural ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with real human nature. Will our fatal flaw kill us before we recover? We also evolved from warrior cultures that did not give up easily.

Diversity is certainly not our strength

The statement "diversity is our strength" can be seen as a simply stupid idea when considering what makes a nation strong or weak; homogeneity, or the composition of like parts, elements, or characteristics, such as ethnic similarity, helps to create order and harmony, whereas diversity in these things creates opposition and clashes, as we see happening in America and the West.

But when Speaker Pelosi and Sen. Schumer utter the stupidity that diversity is our strength, as they have been doing over building a wall on our Southern border, it is also a demagogic statement meant to appease their supporters and garner votes from minorities and the left, which means for Pelosi voters in the deranged socialist state of California, and for Schumer means his deceitful buddies in New York. And of course both politicians curry favor with the Big Media and the Left. You don't see Schumer advocating diversity for Israel, his favorite nation; Israel won't even seriously consider a two-state solution with Palestinians, and has, you guessed it, built a big wall between them.

The left and their buddies in the corrupt Media are intimating people from speaking out against this "diversity is our strength" stupidity by calling people racist and bigoted if they speak against it, which is the kiss of social death in our controlled and corrupt culture. But people, Pelosi and Schumer are busy creating the social death of America, so speak out against it!

Uses and abuses of altruism

When Nietzsche speaks of "the psychological impossibility of a purely selfless action" (WP)," I think it could be said better as, the biological impossibility of a purely selfless action.

Altruism or "selfless" concern for others is a genetically derived instinct on a hierarchy or continuum of altruism that moves from kin and ethnic group at its strongest to the world or the universal at its weakest.

So when religions or political parties call for universal selfless altruism or even selfless love for the world they are moving outside the bounds of reality and human nature. So they back up their universal selfless altruism with the creation of the spiritual and utopian---because nothing real can support it.

No wonder men like Nietzsche declared that God is dead. But God is not dead, only the spiritual, utopian, selfless worldview is dead. Real Godhood can be reached by evolving in the very material world of genetically derived instincts, which are on a hierarchy or continuum of altruism that moves from kin and ethnic group at its strongest to the world or the universal at its weakest.

This suggests, almost obviously, a political world of ethnostates, or an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and a religious world where order and direction can be brought back to reality, and back to the people, by attaching religion, philosophy, poetry, and science to the biological origin of our social behavior, and by affirming the evolution of material life to supermaterial---not spiritual---Godhood. That's a synthesis worthy of our past, present, and future, which doesn't abuse altruism.

We have to say clearly what is politically incorrect to say if we want to reach the people and save the West

Conservatives, at least paleoconservatives, will tell us that unchecked immigration into the West will mean the death of the West, and they are right, the globe could have eleven billion people by 2100, and most of them will seek to immigrate to the West to survive.

As Nicholas Farrell writes (Chronicles Dec. 2018) it's hard to win the arguments made by the alliance between the global left and the global capitalists about having compassion on suffering immigrants, or for creating cheaper products from cheaper tax-paying labor, especially when the West is dying faster than being born. So the argument against allowing the death of the West is the one powerful cultural argument left for conservatives to make.

But it isn't enough. We have to say clearly what is politically incorrect to say if we want to reach the people and save the West, and that is, as the people change the culture changes, or more clearly, as the ethnic group changes the culture changes toward the ethnic culture of the immigrants. If the West has enormous numbers of Hispanic or African immigrants then the culture of the West will change toward an Hispanic or African culture. The West will fade away if the white Euro-American ethnic groups who mainly developed the West fade away. It's that simple or difficult.

The biological and genetic origin of our social behavior and therefore our culture, must be acknowledged if we are to save anyone. Then we can work toward developing an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which is the most equitable cultural/political configuration for all people, all ethnic groups, and the social structure most in harmony with what human nature really is and really does. It can be developed gradually, conservatively, in the U.S. from the already existing Constitutional separation of powers and states.

The 91st Academy Award nominations show who their audience is

Looking at the 91st Academy Award nominations it's easy to see that Hollywood is now totally devoted to reaching the left and minorities and isn't even trying to reach the rest of the country, they are losing to Netflix, Amazon Prime, etc---at least those producers are trying a little bit to reach the people in the fly-over nation between the coasts. Such things as: Best picture, Black Panther, BlacKkKlansman, Roma, Best actress, Yalitza Aparicio, Lady Gaga, Best actor, Christian Bale for "Vice," and so on, and so on, show who their audience is.

These nefarious producers will lose money with this strategy, which is odd because they mainly care only about money. The audience for these award shows is dwindling every year. I suppose they are financially and politically counting on the prediction that whites will soon be a minority in this county. But that is a dangerous road to travel because the dislike of Hollywood is rapidly turning into hate, which their propaganda films won't touch.

How we become what we are

Nietzsche's "becoming what one is," beyond the superficial view of this, involves knowing what human nature is. Individual differences are not superficial but they are secondary to group selection in successful survival and reproduction.

In our time, becoming what one is and knowing what human nature is means absorbing the science of sociobiology, which is the next stage of Darwinism. This counters surprisingly few religious edicts in defining human nature by affirming many of the conservative religious virtues and values. According to the general view of sociobiology, "within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals" in survival and reproductive success, according to E.O. Wilson---and we know how altruism, or being for others, is especially promoted in Christianity.

The present leftist but also border-free capitalist view of human nature sees virtually no biologically or genetically derived human nature and admits only environmentally or culturally derived human nature, which tends to fit their leftist and capitalist political agendas. This reflects the real will to power in human nature, but the will to power was overestimated even by someone as astute as Nietzsche. The will to power in human nature is/was evolved to enhance survival and reproductive success, and survival and reproductive success was evolved to enhance the drive of life to evolve all the way to Godhood.

So when we look at human nature related to "becoming what one is," the reality of human nature points toward the political/cultural solution examined in the ethnopluralism hypothesis. That defines the sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with real human nature, which developed many thousands of years ago and remains today kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States applying our present constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism, but it may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states. That is how we become what we are---and it can apply to Europe or China too.

Unlost Causes

The civil war was fought for States Rights not for slavery, although States Rights doesn't excuse the stupidness of slavery in the south; it has led to permanently angry, increasingly populating Blacks in America, which in turn may lead to the next civil war, this time for an ethnopluralism of ethnostates---in an odd irony, this could be thought of as an extension of States Rights.

The battle for States Rights was not won, our big government took the victory of the civil war to mean that power should be taken away from the states. So to the old cause of States Rights will be added the next cause of ethnostates. Unlost causes return because we always return to real human nature, which remains kin-centered and ethnocentric, as well as territorial, and even xenophobic, among other conservative things.

Vile politicians like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are too demagogic to see that by supporting big socialist/fascist governments which pander to the minorities against States Rights, they are bringing back unlost causes, along with the added new cause of the drive toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, the logical and instinctive extension of States Rights...Happy future?

Developing a healthier world compatible with what we actually are as human beings

I don't know exactly where I would create the dividing line between what I call the Age of Warriors and the Age of Nurturing in the West, because the "warrior" remains biologically and genetically the central feature of men, and "nurturing " remains the central feature of women, no matter how much communism, feminism and postmodernism deny this biologically-derived definition of gender differences. Of course men can be nurturing and women can be warriors but that is not the specialty of the genders.

If we begin the Age of Warriors in hunter/gatherer times when deep human nature was evolved, say, a million years ago, give or take, and follow it up to, say, the fall of the Roman Empire around 476, or the end of the Viking age in 1066 AD, that could be called the long orthodox or formal Age of Warriors in the West occupying at least 90 percent of human history. But as I said, since the warrior and the nurturer remain biologically and genetically the central feature of men and women even today, the Age of Warriors never really ended, it was just buried or sublimated by modern culture, especially in the West---with the exception of the voluntary military men who defend the West, in spite of women being inserted into the military.

So does this mean we should go back to an age of tooth and claw and demand ancient wide differences between men and women, or declare one supreme noble or chosen people over all others? In our increasingly crowded world it would bring survival and reproductive disaster to a people who declared such intentions as the rest of the world would gang up on them and destroy them.

What we do need to do is affirm real human nature and the biological origin of our social behavior. The science of sociobiology recently affirmed biologically-derived human nature as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

This suggests that we should reject (I wanted to say shitcan) the communists/socialists/liberals, feminists, and postmodernists for being against real human nature and therefore harmful to life itself. Then we can get on with developing a healthier world compatible with what we actually are as human beings, for example, developing the ethnopluralism of ethnostates often written about in this blog, which is about as equitable as human beings can be given human nature.

Utopian thinking with its feet on real ground: Religion and philosophy as biological propaganda

If people accuse Hegel's philosophy of being "political propaganda" (Kojeve) then what would they say about religion and philosophy as biological propaganda, which it is?

That isn't an overly reductive statement, it is a basic truth about human and animal life which is hidden mainly because it discloses real intentions related to gaining power.

How can we fix our troubled world with different factions scheming and fighting wars for power if we won't speak about the primary causes?

When we find the courage and the smarts to admit the biological origin of our social behavior then we can have a much better chance of finding longer term harmony.

Both communism and capitalism may more easily see that a world of ethnostates, or as I put it an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, is the closest we may come to longer term political harmony in line with real kin and ethnic-centered human nature.

Then we can get on with affirming the sacred, all of us, with all our differences centered on evolving toward Godhood.

That is utopian thinking with its feet on real ground.

The great wrong of Sen. Schumer and Rep. Pelosi that cannot be mentioned

Beneath the political lies and hypocrisy of Sen. Schumer and Rep. Pelosi is the biological origin of their political decisions, which involves fronting for votes in the changing demographics of America and counting on the coming minority status of formerly majority whites. That has everything to do with their stand against building President Trump's wall at the Mexican border to control illegal immigration and the drug cartels. Think of the corruption and immorality of what they and the democrats are doing! Yet this great wrong cannot be mentioned for what it is. Are they not traitors to the biological survival of American citizens? What could be worse than that?

Can traditional conservatism avoid its own tragic drama and downfall?

Traditional conservatism is right in trying to religiously harness human nature but wrong in the type of harness applied, and this is mainly due to the view of a "fallen human nature."

Traditional conservatism agrees for the most part with the scientific sociobiological view of human nature---or perhaps I should say that the scientific sociobiological view of human nature agrees with traditional conservatism---in human nature across the world being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

But the "religious-making" of traditional conservatism falls down (like modern liberalism) in not including ethnocentrism, xenophobia, and fundamental materialism as an important and healthy part of human nature. Traditional conservatism excludes these things mainly due to their view of human nature as having fallen from the very ascetic Christ who was the most perfect man with a perfect nature. It is those basic materialistic parts of human nature that need to be religiously harnessed or guided rather than called unimportant, or cut out of human nature, or called evil.

And here is where the traditional conservative view of god needs to be transformed rather than murdered, by seeing Godhood as material or supermaterial and as evolved to in the material world. The "fallen" human nature, the ethnocentrism, xenophobia, and the fundamental materialism of real human nature can be seen as not fallen but the very traits involved in our evolution toward real Godhood; those are the attributes of human nature that need to be harnessed or guided by both priests and evolutionary scientists toward evolving to Godhood in our very material world (applying, for example, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates). To call these things evil or fallen is to block the upward path to real Godhood.

Is traditional conservatism headed like a tragic drama toward suffering extreme distress or sorrow and the downfall of the main character? If traditional conservatism can transform its view of Godhood from the spiritual to the evolutionary material/supermaterial, and revise its view of fallen man, then it has a chance to not only survive but reach the Godhood it has so fervently sought. If not we may see a real traditional conservative tragedy unfold.

The sacred task of future religion and science

Hegel thought true satisfaction requires a union of the finite with the infinite, according to Eliot Jurist, but I believe that demonstrates how human's always think in human terms, seeing only beginnings and endings in their human lives they define the universe as having a first beginning and define Godhood as a final ending.

I see no first beginning and no final ending, which doesn't kill religion or Godhood, as science often tells us it does, but it does require a transformation of religion and Godhood. We evolve to an unending series of material/supermaterial Godhoods in the material and supermaterial world, with no beginning and no end.

That means we will get our religious and scientific satisfactions not from dreaming about a union of the finite with the infinite but from reaching different levels of Godhood by way of material evolution---which is the sacred task of future religion and science.

You will need a stout heart and a durable ego to sell this religious/scientific overview to people today. But it's worth it; civilization never lasts long without religion.

The big problem is that the lefty-hedonists do not connect their morality to the biological origin of our social behavior

Bob Dylan had a sort of genius for creating songs that stick in your head and he now still represents to me many of our hippie-lefty-scruffy-slightly-stoned youth, but he also embodies many of the baby boomers who still get weepy (and stoned) about leftist causes, at least on weekends.

Dylan morphed from a Jewish boy born and raised in northern Minnesota to a rather weird-looking, southern-drawling, blues man, complete with gravely voice probably brought on by heavy drug use.

Weed is supposed to be so mild but I have seen the heavy use of weed change the personalities of people, change the way their voice sounds, and the way their mind works, apparently permanently.

But beyond that serious problem it is the idiotic leftist/hedonistic philosophy of Dylan, shared by sanctimonious people like the Clinton's and the Obama's, and all the lefties in the Media, as well as the lefty baby boomers, which has caused the most damage to American culture.

The big problem is that the lefty-hedonists do not connect their morality to the biological origin of our social behavior---they even declare that such a connection is racist and bigoted. Dylan has created many dopey songs about it. And the pedantic professors who taught most of them this culturally Marxist politically correct garbage are busy doing the same thing to the next generation.

Real human nature remains kin and ethnic-centered, and even xenophobic, but real human nature has been blocked by these decadent lefties, which is mainly what has brought American culture and the West into steep decline. So the natural and biologically-derived movement toward populism, conservatism, nationalism, and even ethnostatism now must struggle against these established idiots to save the West.

Mutuality rather than submission

"Mutuality" rather than "submission" is the key idea in adapting the constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by some kind of federalism. That is the political and cultural adaptation to manage the no-longer homogeneous (and growing more so) American population, and it has the great advantage of harmonizing with real human nature, which remains kin and ethnic centered in spite of great social and cultural efforts to wipe it out. Egalitarian multiculturalism has been imposed by those who gain temporary power from trying to jam distinctly different people and cultures into the same living space when for the most part they don't assimilate. Seeing and presenting an ethnopluralism of ethnostates as mutuality rather than submission is not only true but a better way to present it. The imperial supremacy of one-people-one-culture in our crowded world simply does not qualify, is unethical, and is bad for the variety preferred in ongoing evolution.

A conservative religious perspective for material evolution

Science and philosophy brought us to the evolution of consciousness, self-consciousness, and reason, and away from spirit, religion and absolute knowing. Hegel tried to bring them back together in a hierarchical philosophical scheme and I believe he would have succeeded if he had brought them all back to material and supermaterial evolution.

When spirit, religion, and absolute knowing are understood as part of material evolution and not as a non-material spiritualism we can then retain the custom of spirit, religion, and absolute knowing.

That is a conservative religious perspective for material evolution in the Western world which is rapidly rejecting religion but can this way include science and religion together in a realistic hierarchical philosophical scheme that retains an evolving Godhood as the zenith of material evolution.

Where are we now, and where do we need to go?

I love America and defend it, but I don't defend the Antifa movement which openly seeks to block conservative First Amendment free speech, the LGBTQ+ crazies who think they can circumvent biologically human nature, or the Open Border nuts who openly want to replace Middle American whites. I defend traditional America and the principle of law and order, and I affirm the paleoconservative or traditional conservatives in the desire to conserve the best of the past. But I believe we have to go further than the paleoconservatives or traditional conservatives have wanted to go to save America.

The Left worked on the offensive for years to make this radical transformation of America happen, and the Right has been only weakly defensive toward the Left. The Right being religious (and afraid of being called bigoted) has been reluctant to affirm all of the elements of the biological origin of our social behavior, especially the sociobiological fact that real human nature is kin-centered, ethnocentric and even xenophobic. But the conservatives do accept that human nature is gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making. Conservatives tend to overlook the fact that group-selection or ethnocentrism has been the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

I believe we will need to adapt the constitutional separation of powers and states and decentralize toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. We are no-longer a nation of only Euro-Americans but a nation that the Left gleefully tells us will soon be a land where Euro-Americans are a minority in their own country; and we know as the people and ethnic groups change the culture and politics change toward the new preferences.

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with real human nature which developed many tens of thousands of years ago and is still very much with us today. I believe we can accomplish this adaptation of the constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates within our institutions and through legally established processes. Like the conservatives and as a deep conservative I don't believe in illegal radical revolutions which are almost always snuffed out and care nothing for traditions.

Future philosophy: freedom, determinism, happiness, randomness, and satisfaction

If the ongoing evolution of life has the sacred goal of evolving all the way to an ongoing Godhood then freedom and happiness are not the goal they have been propped up to be, but are secondary conditions which happen along the way. "Satisfaction" might be a better word for what we can expect as we continue to evolve toward higher forms.

Freedom and determinism would then be conditioned by that essential activation within life to evolve toward Godhood, which is a deterministic biological activation defining the essence of life; satisfaction would come from bringing life into harmony with what life is in ongoing evolution.

The path of the ongoing evolution of life then adapts to or adjusts to the outside environment, which can sometimes be a random environment of obstacles, but the activation of life to evolve in the material world to supermaterial Godhood---which is also defined as the zenith of success in survival and reproduction---is not random.

On the Golden Globe Awards: Hollywood producers and writers have turned our culture into obscene garbage

While surfing last night I paused at the Golden Globe Awards and I was painfully reminded of how much I loathe Hollywood and the producers of television and film who have turned our culture into obscene garbage. And they have done it not only because the producers and writers are vulgar and talentless but because they purposely wanted to tear down American culture. The one thing these conspirators and betrayers of America are good at is creating cultural destruction and then grabbing what remains of the leftover power.

I especially hate Hollywood and the producers for what they have done to the actresses who we see parading across the stage dressed and acting like street hustlers while chasing fame and fortune controlled by those very same vulgar, talentless, obscene, producers.

Virtually not one healthy thing is promoted by these showbiz rats unless it is a lie, not one thing in politics, art, and not in our corrupted schools; they push only Marxist cultural values while living themselves like organized crime families peddling cultural devastation. Will they, can they, ever be stopped, or do we have to wait until nothing is left of America?

These despicable award shows gleefully poke their dirty fingers in the eyes of the MEGA red hat wearing Trumpians who hate them back with equal passion, but what both may not realize is that those of us who firmly believe in changing things legally and peacefully may not be able to stop the hard rain of fascism on the right or the left from falling.

We can't solve a problem if we don't know what the problem is, or if we are forbidden to name the problem

I heard a CEO say: " America divided doesn't help America or the world." That seems like common sense, even if you figure in the self-serving nature of a global businessman saying it.

But looking deeper you come across the politically incorrect and therefore uncomfortable fact that different ethnic groups within the same country naturally compete, which leads to natural divisions.

Then the "common sense" statement becomes "a country needs to know when its divisions are unassimilating, and divide accordingly, to avoid civil disruption or even civil war." We may then have a chance of solving the problem of our divisions in a peaceful way, and hold the country together with some sort of federalism that protects the differences and divisions.

But that ethnopluralistic solution is enhanced or aided by a sociobiological understanding of human nature, which remains a "political incorrect" solution, mainly because businessman like the one quoted above and culturally Marxist academics who dominate our schools block the sociobiological understanding of human nature.

As you hear often in this blog, human nature is basically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. This definition of human nature basically supports traditional Western values and morals, and it logically and instinctively suggests---at least to a few people---forming an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which could be peacefully adapted to the constitutional separation of powers and states.

So what or who are the disrupters of this natural solution to present and future divisions in the West? The disrupters are the political left, postmodern philosophy, postmodern art, the Big Media, the academic world, global business, universalist religions, etc. Depressing right? But we can't solve a problem if we don't know what the problem is, or if we are forbidden to name the problem.

Is there a cure for the behavioral psychosis of ethnic suicide?

I see a version of psychosis in many of the white talking heads in the media today indicating impaired contact with reality when they arrogantly and triumphantly declare that white people will soon be a minority in America. It is more than the obvious brown-nosing to trendy minorities, it is suicidal. To arrogantly and even happily announce the decline and death of ones own ethnic group, who share many of your same genes and your same culture, is more than pantywaist cuckoldry, it is sick.

Is there a cure for the behavioral psychosis of ethnic suicide? I suppose so, but it will take years to recover. The overall power of the present media and the academic world who encourage the suicide of white Western culture will need to be curbed. If we want to be logical and fair to all groups we will adapt the constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in line with real human nature, which remains kin and ethnic centered, among other conservative things.

Predictions

President Trump has more or less been turning the country back to what Srdja Trifkofic called the "sovereign realism" of pre-1941 America, before the proto-neoconservative Woodrow Wilson began to condescendingly bully the World.

But not being an intellectual and not following fixed patterns of idealism, Trump has retained a few neoconservative advisers who are trying to turn him toward foreign adventures, although Trump's lavish preference for Israel seems to have been there from the start.

So decentralizing America, bringing the troops home, and giving power back to the states where power belongs has been more or less happening, even in the face of the entire media and the entire academic world hating Trump. Trump has so far had the ego to more or less persist.

But sovereign realism and populism can only take us half way back to a sound and sane country. What we face, which sovereign realism and populism have not faced, is the Western and Southwestern states becoming a non-amalgamating Latino territory, and the Black inner cities of the nation continuing to explode in racial conflict and competition.

Real human nature predicts these things will happen because real human nature has the same human preference for kin and ethic/racial groups, which came to be what it is during the millions of years that our ancestors lived in hunting/gathering bands where those genetic preferences were successful in survival and reproduction, so they became part of human nature.

But sovereign realism, populism, and nationalism can be thought of as the first stage of the return to real human nature, and if that can be successful, the next stage will be to adapt our constitutional separation of powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which can then accommodate the natural competition between Hispanics, Blacks, and Whites. Otherwise an ethnopluralism of ethnostates will happen illegally and violently, which we do not want.  In our overpopulated world the imperialism and fascism of one group making slaves of the others is unrealistic.

Politics, business, the stock market, the arts, etc. are the superstructure built upon that structure of human nature, and their future will eventually accommodate real human nature in any case.