Monday, August 27, 2018
The self and the group
The idea of "agency" in
philosophy seems unnecessarily complicated (surprise, surprise). I
think the capacity for individualized choice and action in the world
needs to be biologized, which will require a bit of courage by
philosophers because it is a "politically incorrect" idea.
Connecting "being-for itself and
"being-for-others" means affirming the biological origin of
most of our social behavior. That is the"renewal of agency"
we need. And it addresses the
"alienation" that philosophers go on about.
I think the self and the group are best
understood in the following quote by the great father of
sociobiology Edward O. Wilson: "Within
groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups
of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals."
No
one is more individualistic and self-starting than I am, and if I can
accept this explanation of agency then any narcissist, extreme
libertarian, or person with authority problems can accept it.
There
is great room for individual self-expression in the natural
preference for group-selection which evolved over great time in human
nature and in human behavior. What we need to do, as the great
psychometric psychologist Raymond Cattell pointed out, is understand
the difference between social and antisocial individualistic behavior, especially with geniuses, which was Nietzsche's concern.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment