For philosophy I prefer the patterns of deep-biology to epistemology or psychology

For philosophy I prefer the patterns of deep-biology to epistemology or psychology (although evolutionary psychology moves in the right direction); the biological origin of social behavior better basically explains how and why we know what we know and who are inwardly---deep-biology integrates inward and outward man better than those fields do. Philosophy should at least be considered a branch of deep-biology, which the field of sociobiology points toward.

Unfortunately admitting this means going against the prevailing cultural Marxism which has Western culture in its grip, as tightly monitored as the Soviet Union did or the Chinese now control their cultures, although the West is more sneaky about it.

The old Indo-European ethos of the gentleman warrior mingled with Western Christian virtues has been replaced by an imperial eye-for-an-eye mentality, which, for example, does not see the humane biological advantage of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for everyone, preferring instead a narcissistic, supremacist, resentment of never forgiving or forgetting the past.

Sociobiology even explains why this blockade has happened: people and groups benefit in survival and reproductive power from blocking the truth about the biological origin of social behavior. It's a cowardly, base, and inhumane way to operate in the world, but it has worked, at least in the short term, quite well.

Since I believe biology is ever evolving toward superbiological Godhood I also think the block that these fields have also put up against evolutionary religion has to be unblocked. Synthesizing religion can draw from all these fields. That is the mission of theological materialism.