Sunday, August 26, 2018
The neonationalist shuffle
Neonationalists and neoconservative
intellectuals don't quite run away from neo-Darwinist information
regarding the biological origin of most of our social behavior, they
do a kind of neonationalist shuffle and claim that nationalism is
"forbiddingly difficult to define," as Samuel Goldman
described it (Modern Age, Summer 2018). Then they step in with that shuffle
and argue that a nation is not based on common descent but is
"unified around cultural characteristics" of language,
religion and shared history (Yoram Hazony). Is it the ghost of
Hilter, intellectual cowardice, or a more sinister shell game to
protect real or, ironically, ethnocentric motives?
The neoconservative's failed,
for a time at least, when the new populism surprised the hell out if
them and elected Trump---although Trump has since made them happy
regarding his policies in the Middle-East.
Nations are not all that "forbiddingly
difficult to define," although it is now virtually forbidden to
define them. Throughout human history to this day human
nature is kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual,
marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and
religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the
primary unit of successful
selection, followed by individual
selection. That behavior bonded people together best for survival
and reproductive success and from out of that natural foundation
nation's formed.
Nations are naturally
ethnocentric and even xenophobic and when they are not they tend to
fall, and become feuding multicultural societies which eventually
break back into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. So why not head off
those cycles and begin to establish, or reestablish, an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates? An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or
regions could even be established, legally, in the United States with
our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by
federalism. No radical revolution is necessary.
It may require a few
constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move
toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and it will not be easy at
all, but it is far preferable to radical Marxism or Fascism, or the
political dissimulations based on flawed definitions of nationalism
and human nature which have brought us increasing civil disruptions,
or even civil war, within unworkable multicultural (multi-racial/multi-ethnic)
societies.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment