I
see cultural and art creations not strictly as only the intention of
the creators, not the consequence of ideological systems (see the
French), not merely libidinal forces, and not the consequence of
historical materialism, or economic determinism, although all of
these are included in cultural creations to a certain extent.
I
see cultural and art creations as primarily the consequence of
biological and genetic instincts related to successful survival and
reproduction, along with the deeper sacred activating forces of life
and evolution, as defined in theological materialism. This includes,
along with the instinctive survival needs of the author, the survival
needs of group-selection within which the author exists.
To
change a statement by Roland Barthe about literature really being
capitalist language speaking and not the author speaking, it is
biology speaking deeper than the author's voice, and also speaking is
the sacred goal of biological evolution activating creation to evolve
toward Godhood. The new anti-intention, anti-author criticism seems
largely to be an attempt to empower the critic as the main center of
literary and cultural meaning, a bold intellectual grab for power by
middlemen, intentional or not, who tend to give works illusions never
intended and not instinctively or biologically present.
Thursday, January 14, 2021
Toward evolutionary sacred art philosophy (from the archive)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment