Wednesday, November 13, 2019
How the two ways of knowing of St. Thomas lead to theological materialism
I basically agree with the
two ways of knowing of St.
Thomas, the purely theoretical knowing, and knowing on the
basis of an essential relatedness
but I think these lead to theological materialism.
Today we might call these
ways of knowing left and right brain knowing, although they work
together more than the separation suggests, with some people
synthesizing them more than others.
The theoretical knowing of
the evolutionary sciences have gradually drawn a picture of human
nature that has to be included in religious philosophy, but has not
been done for the most part---although Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and
others tried, their God remained a non-material spiritual God.
Teilhard. like the
traditionalists, believed man has been developing a divine
consciousness and that we
must continue this process of the development of consciousness
toward god-consciousness so that we can reach our greatest
potential as human beings.
But human beings cannot
attain Godhood, only material evolution to whole supermaterial beings, not just spiritual consciousness, leads to real Gods in
the cosmos.
The evolutionary sciences
have empirically shown us that the origin of religion remains within
the structure of the biological origin of social behavior, where
religious bonding, at least in the early days, helped us survive and
reproduce successfully. This in turn brought knowledge of group
selection preferences toward kin and ethnic group that created the
altruism, or being for others, which was later hypertrophied beyond the
reach of both theoretical knowing and knowing on the basis of an
essential relatedness.
So my position is that
purely theoretical knowing and knowing on the basis of an essential
relatedness leads to theological materialism, which is more or less placed in the worldview of
philosophical naturalism with the difference being that philosophical
naturalism is generally irreligious, and theological materialism is
religious in seeing Godhood as the goal of material
evolution not spiritual evolution, which was the goal first only mirrored in the
Father-Within of traditional religion.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment