A few thoughts on the European New Right

If the European New Right really wants to replace biological racism with cultural racism when we know that they both work together in a co-evolution, as explained by sociobiologist E. O. Wilson, then they are mistaken. I'm not convinced the New Right does that. I think Alain de Benoist knows well the biological origin of social behavior.

I think of the New Right chiefly as correctly rejecting supremacism and affirming instead an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. Given the real biological origin of social behavior you can't tout culture without biology since they work together in a co-evolution. Ethnostates have to be grounded in genetic similarity as well as the culture of their populations otherwise you have civil strife.

Then too I hope the New Right is conservative in believing in adapting new changes to what exists, rather than radical revolution. I see they have flirted with the Traditionalist School which gives little attention to the new or to evolution and seems to reject the biological origin of social behavior---which ironically happens to include traditional religion.

If real kin and ethnic-centered human nature is allowed to be what it is, it naturally leads to regionalism, localism, ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. For example, in the U. S. this could be accomplished not by way of radical revolution but through adapting---not overturning---the U.S. constitutional separation of powers and states, with the ethnostates protected from marauding imperialists, supremacists, and global money grubbers, by a light federalism.