The sacred material activation within life

Someone said, perhaps an atheist, that God is the noblest work of man. I would rather say that Godhood is the noblest work of material and supernatural evolution.

The activation within life, the spirit-will, which I have called Tirips, is material, and drives life to evolve toward the zenith of success in survival, or Godhood, within the evolving matrix of the natural world---it would have been called a god in polytheistic times.

We are governed and activated from within to live and successfully survive and reproduce in every cell of the body.

If Tirips knows that its goal is to evolve to Godhood does that make it intelligent, or is it just dumb activation with a divine goal? It is the fundamental and sacred material activation of life and the real foundation of religion, it is the "spark of divinity" within us, but I wouldn't call it a god.

I reserve the the term Godhood for the zenith of material evolution, which seems to be endless, and with higher evolved gods always awakening.

Who the hell is black rapper Jay-Z to tell President Trump how to behave?

Jay-Z once sold crack on the street and shot his brother in the shoulder for stealing his gaudy jewelry.

And who the hell are the black rappers to tell Americans how to treat women when they make swinish Harvey Weinstein's treatment of mostly gentile women look like a rank amateur?

I blame it mostly on the cabal who continues to bankroll and produce the weaponizing of blacks in the entertainment world and elsewhere against whites.

That same Big Media began way back in the 1950's and 60's to destroy traditional American culture, and the youth of America, and their cousins in the academic world completed the process by teaching the college educated the cultural Marxism of postmodernism.

America voted in President Trump largely because they got tired of the Big Media weaponizing minorities against them. And now, of course, the Big Media is in the process of trying to destroy President Trump. It's overdo time to actually tame the Big Media, if that is even possible now.

The mismatch with real evolutionary ancestral human nature

Why the mismatch? Marxism. feminism, modern liberalism and postmodernism, with their imaginary political expressions of cultural Marxism, create a mismatch with real evolutionary ancestral human nature by promoting (brainwashing) a global-centered not kin/group/ethnic-centered, gender-same not gender-different, homosexual not heterosexual, divorce-making not marriage-making, unordered not hierarchical, stranger-loving not localist, and individual-selecting not group-selecting mismatch with our real human nature.

In microcosm it's like the bad consequences of having a food diet which is a mismatch with our evolutionary ancestral human bodies, resulting in most of the diseases and ill-health of modern life, even as new technology can prolong our lives. We eat processed foods and sugar and have gotten way from eating fruits and vegetables, seafood, poultry and eggs, nuts and seeds, just as we have gotten away from conservative/populist/nationalist localism. It is a transformation we need---not revolution---eventually bringing about a match, not mismatch, with our real evolutionary ancestral human nature.

The best match with our our real evolutionary ancestral human nature would be an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, where different ethnic groups can politically and culturally conduct themselves according to who they actually are, in their own states, even within a Democratic Republic, perhaps with only a few amendments to the constitutional separation of powers and states. We would probably want to retain federalism and balance the states together because we need the geopolitical heft of a large nation to defend ourselves in the big world.

This is the political/cultural structure most in harmony with our real evolutionary ancestral human nature, which developed many thousands of years ago and is still very much with us today.

How the "spiritual" element in religion and philosophy became a Great Spiritual Blockade

If the fundamentals of philosophy are indebted to the Neoplatonists, as some have suggested, then no wonder philosophy has been so messed up and obfuscating.

I don't know if it all began with the Indian philosophers or with Plato but the "spiritual" element in religion and philosophy became what I call the Great Spiritual Blockade against material life evolving to real supermaterial Godhood---(it didn't end that natural process but just greatly slowed it down.)

That is also where "duality" got its false start. There is no duality between spirit and matter, mind and body, or spirit and body, these things are all material, including the zenith of these things, which is Godhood.

Forms and definitions can be important but they all material not spiritual, and are not something to be worshiped as a God.

That is the central point I make in the philosophy of theological materialism. The Twofold Path is not a duality, it conservatively retains the first glimpse of Godhood or the Father Within in the Inward Path of ancient religion and philosophy but sees that Godhood as a symbolic experience in the material mind only, which can be reached only in the Outward Path of material evolution.

There is no chair in any philosophy or religious department for this philosophy---that may be both a good and bad thing, good for independence and originality, bad for support.

Who is right, the supporters or the foes of Trump?

People on the left ask how the populist/nationalist supporters of Trump across the country and in the Bible Belt can support the often vulgar behavior of President Trump? It probably tells us that successful survival and reproduction means more to the people than anything else, as the cultural Marxists and global corporations are destroying American culture and American jobs, which Trump says he will stop from happening. The bonding rituals of religion originally helped people survive and reproduce but have been drifting away from that concern for many years.

Everyone leaks everything to the Big Media, which largely rules our culture.  Our national intelligence services are almost as propagandized as the rest of the Establishment in praising the imperial military-industrial-complex, which pays their salaries, although not all of them praise it. But like the rest of us they have become more cynical about law, order, and morality. And they may know more about Trump's past behavior then his followers do.

Who is right, the supporters or the foes of Trump? They are both right, but successful survival and reproduction trumps everything. The problem is knowing the best way to successfully survive in an imperfect world. As I wrote yesterday I believe real human nature naturally leads to the bio-cultural expression of regionalism, localism, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by some sort of federalism, which could be legally adapted to our constitutional separation of powers and states.

Given who we are and how cynical we have become about law, order, and morality, this appears to be the best way we can manage the often dangerous games we play in the midst of the often hidden survival and reproductive drives of competing groups.

The return: optimizing gene expression

I believe we need to optimize the gene expression we inherited from our ancient human ancestors, not only in what we eat (eg. paleo diet) and how we exercise, but in which cultures and political systems we create. This is what truly bolsters our physical and mental health. We have gotten far away from the real human nature we inherited from our ancestors and we need to go back to a healthy expression of who we are.

Our cells monitor themselves and their environment. According to the experts in this field our cells take internal and external signals, analyze them, and then decide if a gene product is needed. Gene expression is the regulation of the process of a heritable trait in an individual carrying the gene or genes that determine it.

In every human culture ever studied human nature included, among other things, kin-selection preferences, incest taboos, marriage, hierarchy, division of labor, gender differentiation, localism, group-selection and even ethnocentrism. If a culture proposes to not include these things the culture does not last long and it will always return to these things. These biological traits also happen to be at the core of conservatism, whereas many of these things are missing in, say, communism, modern liberalism, and post-modernism.

This strongly suggests that real human nature leads naturally to the cultural expression of regionalism, localism, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by some sort of federalism. Given who we are this appears to be the best way we can optimize the gene expression we inherited from our human ancestors.

And then to ground this worldview as deeply as possible we need a religious philosophy to express the material evolution of life to supermaterial Godhood, as seen in the philosophy of theological materialism, with the cultural forms and bonding which can enhance ongoing evolution for all of us.

Monday morning cheer: Are we too stupid or just too corrupt to save ourselves?

It is of course difficult to predict the future but we do know that when the people change the culture changes, and our open borders have changed the people and the culture, which means that distinctly different people will not assimilate but compete, as real human nature proclaims.

And the people have been brainwashed with cultural Marxism by a corrupt and controlled Media and by our ridiculous educational system, and our elites are concerned only with selfish special interests.

The women march in the streets brainwashed by a feminism that has no basis in biological science, and their cuckolded men watch gladiatorial football. And our politicians are corrupted by anti-American lobbyists.

The good size group of populist/nationalists who voted for President Trump instinctively and rationally saw that the way to save America was through economic nationalism, bringing American troops and global businesses home, and controlling our borders.

But the enemies of these saving actions are stopping it, at least in the short term. In the long term there could be violent reaction, pogroms etc. Fascists on the left or the right might rise who think only force can save us. It may take awhile for the big ship to change direction, or sink.

So it does look like America as we have known it will fall, not unlike Rome fell, for many of the same reasons. If that is the way it goes we can only prepare to pick up the pieces of our nation, salvage the constitutional separation of powers and states, and set up an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, this time in harmony with real human nature.

That is your Monday morning cheer...At least we can see a way to rise again toward a better world, and we can begin preparing for it.

Misrepresenting words and meanings: racism or ethnocentrism is not bigotry, and altruism is not universalism

Watching another pompous Hollywood actor at one of the trendy marches yesterday shouting to his adoring crowd that President Trump is a "racist," showed us again the complete indoctrination or brainwashing of the left in misrepresenting words and meanings.

Racism or ethnocentrism is not bigotry, and altruism is not universalism. The love of ones own family, tribe, people, nation, or ones own stock, which is a deep and genetically determined part of human nature, does not and should not mean the hatred of other races, which is bigotry. The love of ones own people is at the origin of real altruism, which is in fact the "unselfish" genetically driven concern for the welfare of others who are related to you.

Any altruism of universalism has to be defined as allowing or even championing distinctively different ethnic groups to love themselves, which may be accomplished best in an ethnopluralism of mostly independent ethnostates.

That is the way real human nature works, which remains kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against real human nature, with such experiments as Marxism, but culture is eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans may then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in.

With this in mind we can look at the policies of President Trump and rationally and instinctively judge what he does or does not do.

My hypothetical response to modern physics

"The field is the sole governing agency of the particle."

Albert Einstein

There is no such thing as “non-physical phenomena,” there are only the forces developed by physical phenomena, all of which we might not yet be aware of.

I am not a physicist but I am presumptuous enough to believe that the “forces” Max Planck, Einstein and Tesla spoke of are all material.

Energy, frequency, and vibration in the universe are not the secrets of the universe, it is matter, discovered and undiscovered, which drives those forces.

Is not the field which "governs" the particle created by the interaction of material forces? The field is not spiritual. In the same way gravity or electric forces are not spiritual, they are brought about by material objects.

Science has refused to see it but randomness to explain evolution is not enough, at least not for me. Randomness seems inadequate to explain the development of form and order, and the timeless movement from simplicity to complexity. I see a material inward activation as a “force”and it is not a non-physical force. In the same way the forces of energy which vibrate the particles are a material force “activating” material particles.

The only “duality” I see, which is not really a duality, is the inward dynamism of a material Spirit-Will or Will-Spirit of life, which I call Tirips, activating material life to evolve in the world toward supermaterial Godhood, shaped by endless sometimes random outside evolution---perhaps that is the force physicists look for.

The exploitation of altruism

Sociobiologist E.O.Wilson explained altruism this way: "Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals."

The standard definition of altruism exploits modern liberalism in saying only that altruism is the unselfish interest in the welfare of others, missing the fact that altruism was developed as behavior that (1) helped genetically related kin and group survive and reproduce successfully, and because (2) group selection was more successful for individuals in the long term.

Unselfishness toward the whole world applies or works only out at the weakest edges of altruism if the world is seriously threatened, which is why universalist religions and political philosophies have not created peace and love in the world.

If altruism was understood as it really exists in human nature we would set up an ethnopluralism of ethnostates and advocate localism, which would relate to realistic bonding between people in groups. We might even have a religion that does not promote universalist non-materialism, and have a real Godhood evolved to in the material world, as described in the philosophy of theological materialism.

Liberals don't have the copyright on transforming culture

"History is rewritten, memory is transformed." James O. Tate

Liberals don't have the copyright on transforming culture, deep conservatism knows that the real task is to know what to leave in, what to transform, and what to leave out.

The deepest conservatism understands that it is the people and territory of the people who create the culture that needs to be preserved if the culture is to be preserved.

Modern liberalism followed the Frankfurt School cabal who created the culture of postmodernism (along with Nietzsche) consciously or unconsciously to advance themselves, which eventually took over the academic world and then the culture of the West as cultural Marxism.

To remove all the inherited traditions of a people will doom not only the culture but the people of the culture.  But before we call this will to successful survival and reproduction evil we need to know that it is natural and a vital part of human nature to create cultures that advance a people.

It is from this perspective that comes the call for the transformation of the constitutional separation of powers and states in the U. S. toward and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which will conserve the cultures of the U.S. but more importantly will conserve the people who create the cultures of the ethnostates within the Republic. The descendants of Frankfurt School cabal might even have their own ethnostate---as long as it wouldn't bother the others.

This seems most fair and in harmony with real human nature.

Is there a solution to the social problems caused by the dangerous lies and complications of the digital age?

The digital age or information age is very vulnerable to liars who use fake social accounts, internet bots, trolls, disinformation, hacking, disguised donations to the right or the left, etc. to discredit and even destroy whoever they want to destroy.

A frustrated West asks, is it free speech? Is it propaganda? And what can be done about it? Will the West and the world have to become less free to become less vulnerable to the manipulation that is destroying us?

Dropping out of it all and returning to conservative individual and family virtues and values, or becoming libertarian and allowing virtually anything, or using force to block all freedom as the far right and far left would do, are unsatisfactory solutions to the digital age lairs who are manipulating and destroying us.

Regular readers know that my ideas on this devilishly complicated problem involve thinking in "politically incorrect" terms, that is, thinking in ways contrary to the cultural Marxism that has been hoisted upon the West.

Beneath the lies of the digital age we can see natural competition between groups that are more nationally and ethnically connected than connected to anything else: Russians versus Americans, Israelis versus Iranians, black versus white, left versus right---which is mainly minority ethnic groups versus whites--and various combinations and alliances between these groups.

This natural reality points toward a conservative transformation---not revolution---which I see coming, where different ethnic groups can politically and culturally conduct themselves according to who they actually are, in their own states or ethnostates---in our case within a Democratic Republic perhaps with only a few amendments to the constitutional separation of powers and states. We would need to retain federalism and balance the states together because we need the geopolitical heft of a large nation to defend ourselves in the big world.

That is the sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with real human nature, which developed many thousands of years ago and remains kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection,

With natural competition between groups more harmoniously contained in ethnostates we all would be less vulnerable to the liars of the digital age who wish to discredit and even destroy whoever they want to destroy... they would have what they naturally and unconsciously want, and each would protect themselves from empire builders.

Trump is Trump and our enemies are many

I was as guilty as the populist/nationalists of moving beyond realism in my hopes for President Trump. We now see that President Trump has gradually moved toward the neoconservatives and the Saudi and Israeli lobbies (if he wasn't with them all along), who are persistent in there swampy behavior. And there is not much we can do about Trump showing his vulgar egocentric side.

It is realistic now to see that our wishes for American First policies, economic nationalism, no-longer being the policemen of the world, bringing the troops home from places which can afford their own defense, closing our open borders, bringing our factories home, ect., all fired by Trump promises, were too much to hope for. Trump will do as much as he can to fulfill his promises, which will not be enough. Trump is Trump and our enemies are many.

But if the effete West can survive the next few decades we can at least  hope to pick up the pieces of a failed nation and start again, perhaps the next time with an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, the most harmonious social structure in harmony with real human nature, which can be legally formed out of our constitutional separation of powers and states.

Demographics don't need to be pessimistic or lead to s---holes

The response of those from countries referred to as "s---holes" by President Trump (which was a bigoted thing to say) should be: "It may seem like a s---hole to you but it is our s---hole. And further more we don't want to immigrate to your abundant nation, we want to maintain and even build up our own unique culture and nation."

Demographics suggest that if we want to stop the open immigration of "workers" into our country we should concentrate on technology which will take the place of immigrant workers. I heard a financial analyst suggest this as a solution for Japan's dying population, since they wisely don't allow immigration to destroy their homogeneous but dying homeland.

In a related demographic problem, we weren't as wise as Japan in maintaining an orderly homogeneous population, and so the U.S. can also think of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates as a solution to our present and future demographic problems, which could even be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, and protected by federalism.

It is treating diverse groups with respect to advocate a homeland to keep them intact and thriving and living in a more natural harmony. This is the opposite of bigotry, as multiculturalists and globalists like to label it, it is treating diverse groups with respect. Human nature remains kin-centered and ethnocentric in spite of years of endless propaganda and even force used to try to make us all the same.

The most important thing lost in modern culture

The most important thing lost in modern culture, which may end up bringing tragic loss, is knowledge of the biological origin of social behavior, a knowledge recently examined (actually reexamined) in the field of sociobiology.

From out of this ignorance, or this burying of knowledge, comes the recent four-letter word cursing of our President by Robert De Niro, or the sad angry slide of actresses from an almost sensible feminism to blaming white men for everything (eg, Emma Watson) and affirming bi-sexuality, lesbianism, etc.

Too many people benefit (at least in the short term) from keeping us ignorant of the biological origin of our social behavior, which would shed much light on the false knowledge of postmodernism, cultural Marxism, and political correctness, which people have used to ride to power.

But the fact is, human nature remains as it has always been: kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this human nature, with such experiments as cultural Marxism, but culture is eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature.

For example, given real human nature, an ethnopluralism of ethnostates seems like the best political configuration for humans beings to live within. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could even be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism.

So the biological origin of social behavior is a very important thing to promote. Weaker intellectuals are discouraged from doing so due to charges of "racism" etc. hurled against them, but people need to become aware of the scams of modern culture if the West and its citizens are ever to be saved.

The false duality running through human history

We can retain religion, we can have Godhood, we can have ethics, embodiment, and transformation, but if we want reality in these things we cannot have transcendence of the material world. We "transcend" toward Godhood through material evolution.

The painting by Raphael, "The School of Athens,"of Plato pointing toward the heavens and Aristotle pointing toward the earth illustrates the false duality running through human history, although that wasn't Raphael's meaning.

There is the supermaterial, there is Godhood, but these divine things are evolved to in the material, not spiritual world. This means that science and religion have been falsely separated and need not be.

It is better to call spiritualism what it is, and is not, than to try to synthesize materialism into spiritualism by keeping it in a system of duality, as the great intellectual fathers of the church tried to do,

But with the Twofold Path conservatives and traditionalists need not reject the spiritual Inward Path of desire-free ascetic living, which can be seen as the first human inward glimpses of real Godhood now understood as reached in the Outward Path of material evolution.

Golden Globe Gibberish

The actresses at the Golden Globe awards didn't dress like clean-cut prostitutes showing lots of thigh and bare breasts, as they usually do, they wore black in solidarity with their victimized sisters, which ironically showed the sense of modesty they usually avoid. Then they lectured men like prudish mothers or priggish sisters regarding how they demand to be treated.

The Hollywood feminists have chosen Oprah Winfrey as the head of a new African-American matriarchy, harkening way back to BC times before the West was created by Indo-European patriarchies. And effete liberal men bow to this atavism.

And while I'm at it, I also don't buy the present movie trend of super-females kicking ass and wasting all men who confront them, no matter what size they are. That's as unreal and stupid as the emotional versions of Marxism they never stop peddling, usually not even knowing it's Marxism.

This brainwashing of women (and men) has come mostly from our colleges and universities, and from Hollywood and the Big Media who exploit it. The actresses and feminists don't see the bad consequences of the gender games they play, and Western men don't have the balls to tell them.

But if the feminists and their Big Media friends continue to push these abnormalities of real human nature the West will crumble, rotten doors (if there are any doors left) will be kicked in by, say, Islamic terrorists, or leftist fascists, who will immediately brutalize all women (by Western standards) and only laugh at the feminists or superwomen who object to it.

These comments come from a man who treats women with respect as a gentleman, not at all like Harvey Weinstein, who pimped women. If these woman were healthy they would purge Weinstein and his cabal, not us. Destroy us and they lose their real protection---although they are so addled now that they don't think they need protection.

Political subtlety or missing the real solution?

When is conservative subtlety just not enough? Talking about "growing political and regional disunity" in the U.S. (Chronicles ) without mentioning the core of social disunity coming from ethnic and racial disunity seems like talking about religion without mentioning the soul or spirit.

Does there come a time when the biological origin of much of our social behavior has to be mentioned if we are to successfully solve our social problems? Ethnic and racial competition and disharmony are not evil they are natural elements of real human nature.

Subtlety is one important conservative element in politics and in art, missing the real solution is another. We eventually will need ethnostates as "contiguous regional republics," which happens anyway after the fall of empires.

Even so, I see the importance of using subtlety regarding such a volatile subject, especially in a society so heavily brainwashed with the political correctness of cultural Marxism.  But someone has to be politically incorrect on this subject.

It's not easy to counter billionaires

It's not easy to counter billionaires who seek to dissolve nation states and borders so that they, the one-percent, can rule. It probably takes billionaires to counter billionaires. National governments have billions to counter billionaires if they wish to, but national governments are often controlled by other billionaires.

So we can only do the work of deep-conservatism with our best efforts and talents, perhaps attract a billionaire or two, a political party, or a government, or most importantly talented individuals who see common sense, reason, and hope for the future in our worldview. Doing nothing is anti-life. Optimism springs eternal and naturally from life and evolution.

Life can evolve toward Godhood if we let it, and help it.

The older "out of Africa" scenario

It still seems to me that it was "out of Africa" for pre-human ancestors, like Homo erectus. Then the evolution of the various subspecies or races in various climates that the pre-humans migrated to, with inter-mating between them here and there. Then at some point it was back to Africa for a now modern human, who then later migrated out of Africa again (perhaps this would then be the real "out of Africa" migration of anatomically modern humans. ) Or maybe Cro Magon's came from the West, as some have suggested, having evolved somewhere else entirely, and then migrated east. I don't have the dates or DNA proof for this, this is not my field---but obviously that never stops me from speculating.

What I see now on this subject just doesn't feel right, there is too much fear, or politics, in the interpretation of data... I am willing to change this old idea when something else looks and feels right.

Expanding the definition of national-security

President Trump seems to have recognized that there needs to be exemptions from wide-open free trade agreements for national security reasons, not only for the vital commodities used in manufacturing military necessities, but also for national security reasons we need a repudiation of wide-open borders, drug trafficking, millions of jobs lost to China, Mexico, etc.  Speaking of China, their transformation from Mao's strict communism to an enterprising version of national socialism seems very much aware of having trade and other exemptions for national security and national sovereignty reasons, and they have been doing quite well, at least for now.

But why is economics the only field given concern with national security? Social order and harmony within the nation is also a matter of national security and national sovereignty. If the nation is being gradually torn apart by imposing multiculturalism and cultural Marxism that is perhaps an even more important matter of national security.

I believe this reality and this need for social order and harmony within the nation eventually points toward the political/cultural solution of ethnopluralism. This is the sociopolitical or political/cultural structure most in harmony with real human nature, which developed many thousands of years ago. We remain kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this human nature, with such experiments as Marxism, but culture is eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, where humans can then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in

It is a conservative transformation---not revolution---which can legally bring about an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, where different ethnic groups can politically and culturally conduct themselves according to who they actually are, in their own states within our Democratic Republic, perhaps with only a few amendments to the constitutional separation of powers and states. But for national security reasons we will need to retain federalism and balance the states together because we need the geopolitical heft of a large nation to defend ourselves in the big world.

The triple internal threat we have to the survival of traditional America and the West is Latino and Islamic migration, legal and illegal, as well as the unassimilable minorities who have lived here for 100 years or more (not to here mention the external threats from China, Russia, etc)

A few conservatives have warned against unassimilable migrants but conservatives rarely have the courage to mention the unassimilable minorities already living here who have created their own cultures within multicultural America, or have succeeded in changing traditional America and West to better fit their own wills to power.

So what we are witnessing is the not so slow suicide of traditional America and white Western culture. This has been cheered on by recent migrants and older unassimilable minorities, as well as by leftists and liberals who were influenced by the cultural Marxism taught in our schools, which was mainly brought here by---you guessed it---unassimilable minority migrants from WWII.

Some may be surprised when I quickly say that it is perfectly natural behavior to be kin-centered and ethnocentric, even xenophobic. But this basic human nature only works well in homogeneous ethnostates. Which is why I advocate an ethnopluralism of ethnostates; in America this can be legally adapted from the constitutional separation of powers and states. Radical revolution is not advocated.

That is the real suicide prevention we require. It is not clear to me that we will prevent the suicide of the America and the West, but healthy people will at least try. In any case, history shows that social chaos eventually returns to natural ethnostates for order.

What killed Western culture?

Conservatives rightly blame postmodernism and its creation of subcultures and a relativity of values for the fall of Western culture, but that alone does not explain the fall.

Homogeneity defined merely as the middle and upper classes reading the same books and listening to the same music was not the only homogeneity fractured, it was also the ethnic homogeneity of Northern Europeans reading the same books and listening to the same music which was usurped by other naturally competing ethnic groups and cultures.

So why can't even paleo and traditional conservatives admit this since we won't recover from a problem if we can't mention its main causes?

It seems to be a combination of fear of being called a racist, and from the non-material, spiritual, universalism inherent in Christianity, or from both. Careers can be destroyed if one is labeled a racist, and crossing basic tenets of ones religion is too traumatic for most folks. Also the successful leftist propaganda of labeling race-affirming as "race hate" was helped along by real race haters usually not of the tradition-sustaining middle and upper classes. The Alt-right seems to have grown from its willingness to mention "race."

The biological origin of much of our social behavior needs to be admitted if we wish to save or revive Western culture. And God need not be lost when real supermaterial Godhood is understood as evolved to in the material world where successful survival and reproduction have always come from group and ethnic selection. 

We need to find a way for this real human nature to allow all groups to prosper, which I believe will come from an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. protected by federalism.

The unfolding of a single thought

Schopenhauer said that his philosophy was the unfolding of a single thought. Theological materialism also unfolds a single thought, but it is the opposite of not only Schopenhauer but opposite many of the religious ascetics.

There is divine purpose inherent in life, which Schopenhauer denied, and it is a purpose very much connected to the material and supermaterial world. "Life" is activated to evolve in the material world of joy and suffering toward Godhood, which is a thoroughly optimistic single thought.

The drive, will, spirit, or activation within life, which I call Tirips, is material, not spiritual, and it defines the essence of life as seeking the zenith of success in survival and reproduction, or Godhood.

This activation of life is not an "evil" Id, we can be conscious or unconscious of it. It is more like a Super-Id seeking to activate life toward Godhood, which we can either help or hinder.

Humans see anthropomorphic endings and beginnings, but we do not have an elevated status in nature, however we can evolve toward higher beings within the structures and strictures of outside natural evolution. It is an endless evolution toward higher and higher Godhoods.

Human civilizations and cultures project from this single idea of life evolving toward Godhood, which organizes not only life but the whole universe.

For the New Year and beyond: bringing the West back to reality

I see two kinds of liberals, those who accept the "reality" that the Big Media tells them is reality, and those who more or less know reality but find reality inconvenient and therefore manipulate reality.

The manipulated reality has been to sell moral relativism, sexual freedom, equality, and culturally malleable identity, and it has been successful! The West is a brutalized mess!

So can we bring the West back to reality? The way the manipulators did it was to march through the institutions, as the leftist Gramsci told them to do, until they controlled the institutions. Alain de Benoist suggested this way to the Alt-right years ago.

But reality is harder to sell than the unreality of moral relativism, sexual freedom, and equality. Conservatives are not as good at lying as the manipulators of reality, who lie with great chutzpah. Is that why force is so often used?

Well, it has to be done legally and not radically, conservatives don't destroy what works. For example, in the U.S. we can transform the constitutional separation of powers and states into regions of ethnostates, more in line with the reality of human nature, which continues to prefer kin and ethnic group, and group selection. That movement has to get going, difficult as it is.