“Bigotry” has been transformed and transvalued by political correctness (cultural Marxism) into being against natural law and against human nature. This means that human nature, affirmed throughout human history as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-grading, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection, is now being defined as “bigotry.” The laws set by nature itself leading to defining natural law and human nature are being defined as bigotry.
Human nature has specified human loyalties in this order: self, kin, ethnic group, locality, state, region, nation and world. This is the order that harmonizes with real human nature, as recently reaffirmed by science of sociobiology. This means that ethnopluralism, with a light federal system insuring the independence of small states, regions and ethnic groups, needs to be seen as being in harmony with natural law and with human nature. For example, this means that those who now stand for heterosexual marriage and against gay marriage, and those who affirm their own familiar ethnic groups without hating other ethnic gropus, are not bigots. This also means we should be protecting ourselves economically with economic nationalism.
The pernicious transvaluation and transformation of the meaning of bigotry, human nature, and natural law---promoted by the media and the academic world---needs to be reversed. History has shown time and again that when cultures move away from natural law and human nature they are pulled back, sometimes rudely, to real human nature and natural law---and revolution often does more harm than good.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment