What we see, and how we see

It only seems like we have a double sort of consciousness: what we see immanently from our brains inside, and the object or thing we are looking at outside. But as we evolve, as consciousness evolves, we see more of the objects outside our minds. Less evolved life sees less of the world than we do, although they may see or sense some things we do not. At the Zenith of Evolution, with Godhood attained, Absolute Consciousness can be achieved, the total outside object is seen; here the subject and the object are the same. This means there is not really two poles of consciousness but different subjects observing objects from various levels of evolution.

If we leave the Spirit or Will to Godhood out of the picture, then without the foundation of the senses, we do no thinking at all. Intellectual intuition is the way we can know the Spirit-Will within, until or unless science finds a better way of seeing the Spirit-Will. This means we take Husserl's phenomenology, which seems to accept only what consciousness “describes” of the real world, as well as the odd world of the mind, and we add the Spirit-Will within as a “presupposition” of consciousness in describing reality. We do not see the Spirit-Will as “metaphysical” but in a supermaterial sense, a sixth sense at this time.

We see with the senses but we are influenced also by the supermaterial sense of the Spirit or Will to Godhood. We are influenced by the activation of the Spirit-Will with the goal of evolving material life to Godhood. The goal of the Spirit-Will is the real Supreme Object of Godhood. In idealistic-realism or idealistic-naturalism, the thinker takes what he can see and know of the real world and uses intellectual intuition coming in from the Spirit-Will to complete the ideal picture of reality, still based in materialism.

I think the religio-philosophy of Evolutionary Christianity or theological materialism is placed in the spatio-temporal world with experiences in accord with the scientific world, but some of the senses are experiential, or probable, or intellectually intuitive. Yet even these are considered to be within the world of the senses, and therefore eventually within the order of science.