Real Ways Of Seeing

Phenomenologist's seem to separate how we see into (1) what comes in from the senses, and (2) what supposedly is already there in the mind as the “essential,” or universals version of, say, an individual tree.

But these are not equal and the definition of the tree is not superior to the actual tree seen with the senses, the real object tree is far more important than it's denotation as a general tree. And furthermore, the general tree is not an Essence existing outside the senses, the universal tree is the product and creation of the senses and exists in the sensual world of the mind as definition.  Even if two plus two is endlessly four, it is far less  important than actual trees.

I reserve the term “essence” for the Spirit Within, or the Will To Godhood, but the Spirit is part of the sensual world in the form of supermaterial substance, It is not merely immaterial definition. This means there is no real separation between essence (the Spirit) and existence (the Body).

The two ways of seeing are (1) from the body-senses-mind-Soul (Soul is the Zenith of the mind), and (2) from the Spirit-Will, and both ways of seeing are material or supermaterial. The central knowledge of the Spirit is knowing It's goal of Godhood and seeking and activating within the vehicle of life to evolve life to Godhood. The Spirit influences the material and supermaterial world in the upward direction of evolution, working within evolution which amorally shapes evolution from without.

This supermaterial world has not been included in positivism and empiricism but it should be included in the future. We affirm what is “given” by the senses but also by the supersenses. At this time this is knowledge from intellectual intuition, so knowledge of the Spirit or Will To Godhood is classified at this time as idealistic naturalism, or theological materialism. But the Spirit-Will physically exists perhaps in every cell of the body.