It
looks like another coming competition between advocates of the
biological evolution of man and advocates of artificial evolution
replacing biological evolution.
Among
those who have been rightly worried about the threat of
technology---where one technology brings or requires another, as mass
autos brought mass roads and computers brought the loss of
privacy---some have become opposed to new technology, while others
think technology can rule us better than we can rule ourselves.
Futurist
Ray Kurzweil said:
'We're going to become increasingly non-biological to the point where
the non-biological part dominates and the biological part is not
important any more...In fact the non-biological part - the machine
part - will be so powerful it can completely model and understand the
biological part. So even if that biological part went away it
wouldn't make any difference.”
I
wonder if advocating that we become non-biological machines is a
cunning way to dodge or block our actual human biological
evolution? But pushing “singularity,” replacing biological man
with more intelligent machines (ruled by Kurzweil types?) seems more
dangerous than eugenics.
Sometimes I call myself a
“bioconservative,” I don't want technological evolution to
supersede
biological evolution. I want to lesson human suffering, which can be
aided by new technology, but I also want to evolve healthy more
intelligent people in a continuous way out into the cosmos, which is positive eugenics, and to do so with non-coercive voluntary
prenatal screening, genetic counseling, genetic engineering, etc.
I
believe that life and evolution show a religious goal of attaining
the supreme survival success of Godhood by way of evolving in the
material and supermaterial world, activated from within, and shaped
by natural selection and evolution from without. This means ascending
levels of Godhood from man to superman to supermaterial Gods; it does
not mean a transcendence from material life to non-material spiritual
life, or replacing man with more intelligent machines.
We
can learn to prevent the decline and early death of a variety of
people, ethnic groups, and societies by understanding the social and
biological patterns that bring collapse, and by applying voluntary
population control and genetics. We can help prevent negative ends,
but we can also civilize the beast and seek positive ends, even as we
recognize that competition, separation, and distinctiveness are a
good thing on the evolutionary path to Godhood.
Evolutionary
religion is the moral way to deal with modern
technology and not ban
modern
technology.
No comments:
Post a Comment