China's weakness, like the past
weakness of the Soviets, is that China is an empire of conquered
peoples of different ethnicities, with different languages, held
together by the force of the Communist Party, which is more
totalitarian than Stalin or Hitler.
We know what real
human nature naturally leads to, even though our schools won't teach
it. Human nature is kin-centered, gender defined,
age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical,
ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other
conservative things, with group-selection or ethnic selection as the
primary unit of successful
selection, followed by individual
selection.
Cultures can operate for a
time with behavior that goes against this human nature, with such
experiments as Marxism, but cultures are eventually pulled back by
the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures
that better reflect real human nature.
So common interest
(Cicero), love (St Augustine), equality (Marx), or globalism (Rand),
will not bring distinctly different ethnic groups or cultures
together in peaceful social harmony. Social harmony comes best in
ethnostates where people share the same ethnicity and language. This
suggest that an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is the way to go for U.
S. in the future, held together with our already existing
constitutional separation of powers and states, with federalism
protecting the whole.
China will eventually separate into
ethnostates, as the Soviet Union did, but the U.S experiment with
multiculturalism and global empire also will fall apart for the same
reasons. Better to have the makings of an ethnopluralism
of ethnostates planned and ready to go than to fall apart in
chaos, as are competitors will. The U.S. has always been strong in
being able to innovate, and an ethnopluralism of
ethnostates is a political innovation based in the long
history of human social behavior.
Can we do it? Whoever can
develop an ethnopluralism of ethnostates will own the future.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment