It looks to me like the latest chemical
bombings in Syria have been implausibly blamed on the Syrians or
Russians, who deny being involved.
Acts of immoral deception can be buried in such
motto's as "by any means necessary" or "by way of
deception." Naive Christian's think, "by golly, those
motto's do not mean immoral means."
The deceivers and conspirators know
that Northern Europeans tend to cling to the old military idea of
moral leadership ("tell the truth and shoot strait.") or
the Christian idea that leadership is moral leadership, and this is cunningly exploited.
So the conspirators waited until they
could place war-hawk and neoconservative John Bolton officially in
office as National Security Adviser to President Trump; they
knew that chemical bombings in Syria could be exploited by Bolton
and they knew that our military would be used to retaliate by bombing Syria,
and even taking over sections of Syria.
That's my hypothesis, it's direct meddling to change things before they happen, or quickly exploiting mistakes, or both. The question also is, who
uses immoral means as an operating principal? And who benefits most?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment