The ethnostate option: independent religious communities and antitrust policies would not stop the civil disruptions mainly caused by natural ethnic competition

Although the five Big Tech companies, Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Amazon, may be more left/libertarian than the liberalism of old Big Media, they all campaigned with Hillary Clinton, and they all censor conservatives---even as Big Tech tolerates and profits from gross pornography which can be easily seen by our children.

We could apply antitrust policies that really do break these huge corporations up, which are owned by many of the same cabal, but they are so powerful and rich that they can probably control antitrust policies. John Seiler Jr. of "Chronicles" (Feb 2018) also writes about the Benedict option, suggested by Rod Dreher, which takes inspiration from the option used by St. Benedict who after the fall of Rome built monasteries around which civilization could be maintained and hopefully later rebuilt.

I think a deeper more long lasting solution could be called the ethnostate option that would gradually separate us not into religious communities but ethnic communities, which could then ban whatever media they wanted to yet still follow the U.S. constitutional separation of powers and states. That would be more in line with real human nature, which remains kin-selecting, marriage-making, hierarchical, with a division of labor, gender differentiation, localism, ethnocentrism, and even xenophobia (group-selection trumps individual selection)---and all those basic traits are mainly genetic traits developed over many thousand years.

Independent religious communities and antitrust policies would not stop the civil disruptions mainly caused by natural ethnic competition: the ethnostate option would.