Wednesday, February 28, 2018
The long-term solution to the wreckage of our culture is only beginning along the horizon
If we ask why are one out of twenty
films and television shows so bad and missing talented writers,
directors and actors, I think it more or less has to do with the producers
preferring to help kin and ethnic group become rich and influential
over more talented people. When you add the mix of distinctively
different cultures and ethnic groups all competing in America and the
West it becomes difficult to define "excellence" anymore. And postmodernism in the academic world steps in and teaches all
college grads that, in any case, all things are relative, including
truth.
Multiculturalism has led to the decline
of American culture. Excellence used to be defined as "the best
that has been thought and said in human history," but that was
when the culture was homogeneous and mainly Northern European. That
was before globalism, before mass immigration, when America was more
of a republic than an empire, when we had economic and populist
nationalism.
The fact is, preferring to hire your
kin and ethnic group is completely natural and a big part of real
human nature. That reality points not toward
multiculturalism, which creates only chaos, but toward the
political/cultural solution of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates,
where different ethnic groups can politically and culturally conduct
themselves according to who they actually are, in
their own states or regions within our Democratic Republic, perhaps
with only a few amendments to the constitutional separation of powers
and states.
This long-term solution to the wreckage of our culture is only beginning along the horizon.
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
We won't gain Godhood by blocking material evolution
More on the error of opposites:
"Divine" truth and human
ignorance are not opposites any more than the "spiritual"
is opposite the material. Both sides are on a continuum of material
life evolving in nature from the material to the supermaterial.
Why the insistence on separation and
opposites by religious mystics? Is it their way of competing in the
material world to hobble the material world? Nietzsche thought so.
We don't need to reject God as Nietzsche did, we just have to
correctly define Godhood.
What the mystics are doing is blocking
the very thing they claim to love most: Godhood. We won't gain
Godhood by blocking material evolution.
It is not the quality of thinking that
determines mans status in the cosmos, it is the level of evolution of
his whole material body and mind. We transcend not by transcending
flesh and mind (which is not really what mystics are doing even if
they think they are) we transcend by way of material evolution---slower but true.
Joining religion and science could speed things up.
Monday, February 26, 2018
Mistaken Dualities
There is no real duality between the
spiritual and the material because there is only the material and
supermaterial. This duality is a metaphysical mistake that blocks or
at least slows down the material from evolving to the supermaterial.
There are thousands or millions of
degrees of intelligence between Godhood and man but both are
materially connected and related through material evolution.
Religion has been the connection
between Godhood and man, but science needs to be in included since
science can be a great aid in helping us to evolve toward Godhood.
There need not be a false duality here.
The foundation of life is only
superficially dual between the inward material activation of life and
the outside natural material environment, they
are one dynamic thing.
Evolution is the struggle or adaptation
between life and the outside environment of life, with the goal of
life to evolve toward the most possible success in life, which is
Godhood.
When the ultimate goal is not known,
evolution is slowed or blocked, although life evolves even if it
is ignorant of its own evolution.
Sunday, February 25, 2018
Dealing with the Two-Headed Dragon of the Internet
The Internet is like a Two-Headed
Dragon with one head as the greatest library-of-everything in the
history of humanity, and the other head as the greatest filthy swamp
of lies, crime, and pornography in the history of humanity.
As a thought experiment, think of the
United States and China as dealing with the Two-Headed Dragon from
different sides of "freedom" yet on the same eventual swing
toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, which I think will
inevitably happen in both countries. Why? Because human nature
remains as it has always been, kin-centered, gender
defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical,
ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other
things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful
selection, followed by individual
selection. China and the United States are not ethnically uniform
and fierce competition between distinctly different groups and regions will
happen, as happened in the Soviet Union.
By any traditional
definition of destruction, the Two-Headed Dragon and the Big Media
have been destroying American culture and the American people, even
as great new technology is developing, and if we don't want
totalitarian fascism on the left or the right to put up a great
firewall of censorship, as China has done, then rather than either
the Two-Headed Dragon, or totalitarian censorship, I would prefer to
apply our energy toward legally adapting and transforming our
constitutional separation of powers, states, and regions into an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates.
If one ethnostate wants to
set up another Sodom and Gomorrah they could do so, but other
ethnostates could set up firewalls of censorship that would, for the
most part, protect them from the filth---at least while they wait for
the degenerate state to inevitably fall. The main job of federalism
would be to protect the independence of the ethnostates from each
other and from foreign powers.
Do you have a better idea
that relates to real
human nature?
Saturday, February 24, 2018
Inward activation and outward natural selection in transformed religion
We can think of life and evolution as
the continual activation of life from within (Tirips), offset by
continual evolutionary natural selection from without.
Natural selection from without
continually checks and balances the inward activation of life, which
defines evolution. Both inward and outward forces are needed. Neither
are evil.
Furthermore the inward activation of
life is entirely material and seeks to activate life to successfully
evolve all the way to material or supermaterial Godhood, as life makes
its way within the natural selection of the environment it finds
itself living in.
Mystics tend to think of the inward
forces as spiritual and non-material and think of outside material
forces as demiurgic or demonic. That is mistaken.
Mystics are in metaphysical error when
they remove themselves from the evolutionary natural forces which
lead life toward real Godhood. And science is in error when it
ignores the sacred goal of the inward activation.
Friday, February 23, 2018
The bias of spiritual religion over material religion
The spiritual blockades the material
in mysticism. Natural material elements are defined as demiurgic.
This is a bias against the real world.
The symbolism of the upside down tree
of the mystics shows the acorn or spirit as superior to the branches
and leaves, turning natural evolution upside down.
So modern man naturally rejects this
mysticism and loses religion.
When Godhood is seen as material, or
more precisely supermaterial, and only evolved to in the
material world, then the ridiculous upside down tree can be turned
back on its feet, perhaps not to symbolize the material evolution to
Godhood, but to rescue religion and the tree from negative
symbolism.
The ultimate stage of knowledge isn't
higher "knowledge;" that idea shows bias toward the mind
over the body leading to the bias of spiritual religion over material religion.
The "hierarchy" doesn't put
the spiritual on top leading downward to the intellect and last to
the material body, Godhood isn't "intangible," Godhood is
material and evolved to in the material world.
Godhood is not merely a thought, idea,
understanding, or mystical experience in the mind, Godhood is a
material/supermaterial object, or objects, evolved to in the material
world.
We best soon get on with helping evolution along toward Godhood, rather than blocking it.
Thursday, February 22, 2018
Real realism regarding America
"In 1776, America set off to
unleash human potential by combining market economics, the rule of
law, and equality of opportunity...and only 241 years later converted
our original villages and prairies into $96 trillion of wealth."
Warren Buffet (Time, Jan. 15 2018)
So what happened?
The genius of America worked well until
all those good things were corrupted, one after the other. Market
economies became global and greedy, not national, the rule of law was
weakened by the steady drift toward cultural Marxism, and equal
opportunity was corrupted by mass immigration and the growth of
minorities who would not or could not assimilate into the mainly
Northern European ethos which developed market economics, the rule of
law, and equality of opportunity.
And the same thing happened in Europe
at an even faster pace. The West has been descending into a chaos of ethnic
conflicts.
The big question is will we fall for the totalitarian
temptation and use force to create order between unassimilating
people? We don't have to do that.
We can adapt the great constitutional
separation of powers and states, which we already have in America
(although that too has been corrupted) toward establishing an
ethnopluralism of regions and states, in harmony with real
human nature, which remains kin-centered and ethnocentric.
We can do this legally, without
revolution, and without negatively claiming the supremacy of one
group over another. We can return to the economic nationalism that
made our country great, and we can allow our people to live as harmonious as
is realistically possible living in their own ethnostates, protected
by the rule of law, with a federalism designed mainly for protection.
How likely will we affirm this realism
before we descend into chaotic civil war ending in
totalitarian force on the left or the right? The flat fact is our people have been brainwashed by cultural Marxism. So can we be optimistic?
Life itself is optimistic in every cell
of the body which reaches to live, survive, and prosper. I think we
will get there, one way or another, because it is real and natural
behavior for human beings.
Wednesday, February 21, 2018
More polytheism than theism?
Speculating here that it is true that
when a sun or star dies the surrounding solar system dies, but there
are many stars and suns in the universe and no one star upon which all depend.
And I don't see Godhood as a human
heart upon which all the cells and organs of the body depend, I see
many hearts, various levels of Godhood, evolved to in the material
and supermaterial world.
There is interaction between the forces
in the universe but no one God upon which all the others depend.
There are many central centers of powers within the centers of many
galaxies, and the galaxies may even be somehow connected
electromagnetically, but no one center upon which all the others
depend.
This suggests a great variety of forces
interacting and evolving in the cosmos, with Gods always, but not
often, evolving at different levels of material and supermaterial
evolution. But it is an endless evolving, with many starts and stops
along the way. There seems to be no one cosmic beginning or ending,
only endless evolution and devolution.
Is that more polytheism than theism? In
any case, it is not spiritualism---which can be more easily abstractly fantasized. More realistically we have "only"
material and supermaterial evolution. Many centers are better than one center for vital evolutionary variety. Why isn't that enough?
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
It is actually cruel to demand that distinctly different people are all the same and that they must all get along together in the same location
Can't we all get along? The answer is,
no, distinctly different people do not get along well together, which
is why separate nations and states developed. The one place we are
the same is in sharing the same kin-centeredness and ethnocentrism,
among the other traditional traits, like localism and
gender-differences.
So why then have religious leaders,
middlemen, and managers since the dawn of human history tried to make
us all get along no matter how different we are from one another?
The cynical truth is that the middlemen gain power, at least
short-term, from the attempt, even though it has been mainly
universalist-globalist-Marxist--pseudo-liberal-neoconservative
flim-flam.
It is actually cruel to demand that
distinctly different people are all the same and that they must all
get along together in the same location, and then when they naturally
don't get along to use force to try to create order---but only for a
short time.
"Behavioral norms" do not
mainly derive from ideology and are not religiously/politically
pulled out of the abstract air. Our social behavior mainly comes from
the biological origin of our social behavior, which is deeply
kin-centered and ethnocentric, among the other traditional traits.
We can best solve our differences and
create order the way we have always done, by forming separate nations
and states, which work best as smaller ethnostates. That's the
natural way---though not perfect---for us to all get along, while
creating distinct cultures that are harmonious with what we actually
are.
So who is stopping this? Look to who
benefits most from globalism and open borders, no matter how much
suffering it causes the rest of us.
Monday, February 19, 2018
As the people and the media change the culture changes
The Dutch and Anglo-Saxons who founded
and developed America had no idea of the future power of the Big
Media, how could they have foreseen film, television, and the
internet?
The morals and culture of the
aristocrats set the cultural pattern for centuries, which the lower
classes and especially the middle class tried to copy. Then it was
the middle class who set the moral tone for the lower classes. Now,
mainly due to the Big Media, it is the morals and culture (or often
lack of them) of the lower classes and minorities that dominate
popular culture. Any honest assessment of popular culture
would admit this.
And again, this was mainly due to the
power and influence of the Big Media. Anglo-Saxon controlled
corporations paid little attention to the takeover of the media, at
least not at first, not seeing its influential power, and by the time
they realized the power of the Big Media, white Western culture had
been made the enemy.
That's where we are today. The Big
Media celebrates fame, money, drug-taking rock stars, foul mouthed
actresses, sexually rampaging black athletes, and cultural Marxism, and the Big Media
ridicules or even hates traditional Western morals and culture.
In any case, the Western world and
Western people will not recover until the present Big Media
monopolies, and whoever owns and controls them, are seriously
challenged and curbed.
It's a fact that as the people and the media change
the culture changes.
Sunday, February 18, 2018
"Life" gives the lie to a relativity of truth
Postmodernism was almost right about
the will-to-power (via Nietzsche). They should have more accurately
defined the will to power as the drive to survival and reproductive
success, and defined it as deeply determined within human nature, not relative.
Liberals like to say that conservatives
are " trapped in the 1950's." Conservatives, like everyone else, are really
"trapped" in human nature, but why put that negative spin
on human nature, why call it "trapped"?
Because lies and hypocrisy are often
part of the drive to survival and reproductive success, even if it is
usually a short-term and ignorant part of human nature. "Life"
gives the lie to a relativity of truth.
If you are alive you are biologically
determined, and not to be a Marxist, a modern liberal, or a
postmodernist. We are all biologically determined to be
kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual,
marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and
religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the
primary unit of successful
selection, followed by individual
selection. That looks a lot like the conservatism of 1950's---and
looks nothing like the prevailing cultural Marxism.
1950's conservatism needs
only to be updated, by adapting the constitutional separation of
powers and states to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, to reflect and
advance what humans really are determined to be and become. That's not a "relative" truth, it is the truth of the real
living object and not merely the airy nothing of intellectual
abstractions...I would also add that I hope we are helped along by an evolutionary religious philosophy (see theological materialism).
Saturday, February 17, 2018
If we can survive the Marxist and Randian false ideas of freedom
To Marxian fascists on the left (also modern liberals) and
Randian libertarians on the right (?) (also neoconservatives) who believe we have complete
freedom to create any Utopia we can think of, I reply that I have the
freedom to say: grow up, or if I'm not feeling tolerant: go to hell.
Sociobiology isn't merely
"deterministic," as its enemies like to call it, but there
is a loop between biology and culture initiated by biology. We follow
the determination of our genes which can adapt to whatever
environment we are living in. Our cells take internal and external
signals, analyze them, and then decide if a gene product is needed.
"Gene expression" is
the regulation of the process of a heritable trait in an individual
carrying the gene or genes that determine it.
In every human culture ever studied
real human nature in general included, among other things, kin-selection
preferences, incest taboos, marriage, hierarchy, division of labor,
gender differentiation, localism, group-selection, even ethnocentrism
and xenophobia. If a culture proposes to not include these things
(which by the way resemble traditional conservative values) the
culture does not last long and it will always return to these things
because they are largely biologically determined.
We have freedom within several
determined paths. We don't have to freedom to grow wings and fly like
a bird (although transhumanism might want to try) but we do have the freedom to invent supersonic airplanes
(assuming we are genetically/culturally smart enough). We can't
create unworkable Randian or Marxist Utopias but we can create a
workable ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with what we really are---assuming we can survive the Marxist and Randian false ideas of freedom.
Friday, February 16, 2018
Listing those most responsible for the mess of American culture
Starting with those most responsible
first: 1. the Big Media, 2. Big Business, 3. the politicians, 4. the
academic world...Who these people actually are is for some other list.
Politicians won't go against the
"political correctness" of the Media because the Media can
destroy them if they do. Big business cares mainly about making
money and any improvements they make are ultimately based on making
money. Religion has been almost useless having been destroyed by the
Big Media and the academic world. Parents alone have not offset the cultural power and degenerate influence of the Big Media
and the educational system.
That is a lot of strong forces against
having a healthy America. But life is instinctively resilient and
optimistic no-matter what the cultural trends are doing or not doing.
Basic human nature will return, as it always has. As E.O. Wilson
said: "Within groups, selfish
individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat
groups of selfish individuals."
We
all remain
essentially kin-centered,
gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual marriage-making,
hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making,
among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of
selection. Rational and instinctive channeling of human nature and human
drives into cultures that harmonize with real human nature will move in this basically
conservative direction, because that is what we always return to when too large empires fall.
Thursday, February 15, 2018
The Big Media and school shootings
If we define evil as profoundly immoral
and malevolent then is the Big Media evil or just stupid? Well, they
aren't stupid so.....
The Big Media became wealthy creating,
promoting, and featuring T.V. shows, movies, and computer games that
celebrate gross violence, hedonism, immorality, even as they also
create, promote, and feature cultural Marxism, anti-bullying
campaigns, transgenderism, etc, as taught in our schools.
Then the Big Media cashes in on the advertising dollars that come
from endlessly promoting and featuring the chaotic results of the
school shootings and the violent schizophrenic
culture which they helped to create in the first place.
The Big Media and the academic world would prefer to ban all guns other than those owned by the leftist fascists---not rightists. The middle right and modern liberals just want to be libertarian and free to make money or worship and play as they please. The far right wants control of the guns by way of fascism on the right. Which way will we go?
I think the longest term solution to our violent schizophrenic
culture is to eventually be separated along the lines of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in accord legally with our constitutional separation of powers and states. That is the traditional way to maintain a natural social order in harmony with real human nature, and far less prone to violent schizophrenic
cultures. I suppose things will have to continue to get far worse before that becomes a solution.
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
How and why did theological materialism develop?
Genes and culture developed to bond
people much like a family, the real forces
of human social behavior work along the same lines as pre-existing
biological forces in a sort of feedback loop between biology
and culture. Then the natural environment affects the way genes and
culture express themselves.
Cultures also change because natural
instinctive desires for success in survival and reproduction cause
men to manipulate cultures in the attempt to advance themselves and
their own groups. And so different religions and philosophies and
cultures change and evolve.
The best religions and philosophies
contained the most harmony with real human nature, that is, they
affirmed, and bonded, the natural human behavior of being
kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual,
marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and
religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the
primary unit of successful
selection, followed by individual
selection. That was and is the base of conservatism.
Religions, philosophies
and cultures can operate for a time with behavior and beliefs that go
against nature and human nature, but religions, philosophies and
cultures are eventually pulled back by the biological/genetic leash
of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human
nature, and then humans work within and adapt to the environments
they find themselves living in.
Paganism contained many
elements that bonded natural human behavior and real human nature, as defined above, but as we
learned more about real nature and real human nature, religions,
philosophies and cultures changed. The "revealed religions"
and philosophies, such as Christianity and Hinduism, retained many of
the bonds of past pagan religions even as they changed them.
Theological materialism is
more or less placed in the ancient/modern worldview of philosophical naturalism, with
the difference being that philosophical naturalism is generally
irreligious, and theological materialism is religious in seeing
Godhood as the goal of material
evolution, first mirrored in the Father-Within of traditional
religion, which is retained but transformed. (See more extensive
reflections on theological materialism here)
Tuesday, February 13, 2018
We need REAL conservative thinking on economics
Conservative
Mark Brennan speculates (Chronicles, Feb 2018) that a way to deal
with the destructive debt of our great country (3.65 trillion dollars
in 2007) might be to tax the top 20 percent who own roughly 83
trillion dollars in aggregate wealth, which is about 85 percent of
the wealth of the nation. Fed outlays are over 3 trillion dollars a
year, which would be about 4 percent of the wealth of the 20 percent.
So Brennan suggests taxing the top 20 percent that 4 percent spent by
the Fed, with no deductions.
That
is the kind of conservative thinking that Wilhelm Ropke might
have liked, who said "The market is only one section of society.
It is a very important section, it is true, but still one whose
existence is justifiable and possible only because it is part of a
larger whole which concerns not economics but philosophy, history,
and theology."
It
is hard to think of libertarians as conservative because they promote
an extreme laissez-faire political philosophy advocating only minimal
state intervention in the lives of citizens. Alas, that is the
political philosophy of the new tech billionaires, and it also is the position of the corrupt neoconservatives. Economic nationalism is more
conservative because economic nationalism emphasizes "domestic control
of the economy, labor, and capital formation, even if this requires
the imposition of tariffs and other restrictions on the movement of
labor, goods and capital. In many cases, economic nationalists oppose
globalization or at least question the benefits of unrestricted free
trade." (Wikipedia)
Burke
rightly said that political change should be gradual, but the
economic solutions suggested above look revolutionary. 21 trillion in debt (now more) will probably soon force
the government to change its current 75,000
page tax code, which was virtually written by the almost criminal
lobbyists who do not care about our country. The obscenely wealthy
will fight those changes, and they usually get what they want.
But a few of the top 20 percent, for example Warren Buffet, says that he should
be taxed more than his own beleaguered office help, who are now taxed
more than he is.
Monday, February 12, 2018
The metaphysics of materialism
We begin with materialism and evolve
toward supermaterial Godhood. Spiritualism isn't necessary in defining
Godhood.
Why do we need the "first cause"
from which all spiritualism finds its best proof? Because human beings
anthropomorphically see life as beginning and ending? As above, so
below? No.
The more probable view is to see no
beginning and no ending, and the cosmos as always evolving and
devolving and not needing a first cause.
The "invisible" is not more
real than the visible, it is just less evolved materially. Technical
instruments continue to reveal what was invisible in the past.
Contrary to the mystics, those parts of
nature closest to a "beginning" are the lowest parts of
creation and do not bask in the glow of God. Beginning parts must
materially evolve to the higher stages of life, and eventually can
evolve to supermaterial Godhood, which is the furthest away from the
beginnings.
So Godhood need not be lost in
accepting the reality of materialism and naturalism. The material phenomenal cosmos is all there is---even the activation within life
to evolve toward Godhood is material.
In theological materialism the Twofold
Path conservatively retains the old so-called invisible God or Father
Within in the Inward Path, but it is transformed in the Outward Path
of material evolution to real Godhood.
Sunday, February 11, 2018
The #MeToo movement is throwing the gentlemen out with the harassers and forcing modern lovemaking out with the slob
The predicable reaction has been swift,
corporate men have stopped traveling with women and stopped mentoring
junior women. But the feminist police are already on it trying to
create corporate laws that enforce one size fits all.
One of several things the feminists and
leftists don't realize is that their subversion of real gender and
ethnic differences is probably more decisive in the fall of nations
than political challenges---Gramsci would see the #MeToo movement as
the next stage in undermining and subverting the West.
The feminists are even trying to invade
the Special Forces, the last able bodied men in the country,
demanding that men and women are equal in fighting prowess---if only
women weren't discriminated against by the patriarchy.
Western women have had more freedom
than any women in the world, but they have abused their freedom. I don't want to see women treated unfairly or abused, but I
can see the Islamic fundamentalists watching this self-destruction of
the West with amusement and declaring that they will inherit the
West---as their smiling women serve them strong coffee and give birth
to many children.
Saturday, February 10, 2018
Can we talk about the Civil War rationally?
I think not secession but ethnostates
within the union was, and remains, the natural way to go. Lincoln and Davis were both right and both wrong. We need the union
to protect ourselves should other outside powers attack us, but
the union needs to relate to real human nature.
Ethnostates or an ethnopluralism of
ethnostates relates best to real human nature, which remains as it
has always been throughout human history: kin-centered,
gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making,
hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making,
among other things, with group-selection
(or ethnic selection) as the primary unit of successful
selection, followed by individual
selection.
An ethnopluralism of
ethnostates or regions could even be established legally in the
United States with our constitutional separation of powers and
states, protected by federalism. It may require a few constitutional
amendments to give more power to the states.
As to the slavery of the
South it was wrong on many levels, but it was naturally falling away
with new technically advanced machines for the cotton plantations. In any
case, force is not the best long-term way to integrate different
ethnic groups, who do not really assimilate, as we see in our prison communities. The military now brags about its integration of races but virtually uses force to do it, rejecting or destroying anyone
who doesn't go along with it.
The Ancient Greeks had a
better, more natural, way of forming a federation of state militias
when the Greek federation was threatened by outside forces. Sure
there was competition between the states, and some states were better
fighters than others, but what's wrong with that? The competition
improved all groups.
Friday, February 09, 2018
Cultural Marxism is like some underground, satanic, upside-down, plot
Some of the synonyms for crime are
lawbreaking, misconduct, illegality, villainy, crookedness, malfeasance. Postmodernism has been an
intellectual and political crime against human society, but
postmodernists claim that those who defend natural human
relationships and real human nature are bigoted and racist!. What a
scam! What con men!
The cultural
criminals who have corrupted are culture are mainly the academic
world and the Big Media. At least since the 1960's they have
propagandized and brainwashed the public into accepting, for the most part, cultural
Marxism, which has turned real human nature and natural human
relationships upside down, calling evil good and good evil, like some
underground, satanic, upside-down, plot.
Real human
nature and natural human relationships are kin-centered,
ethnocentric, and even xenophobic, and there is not a damn thing
wrong with that! How can we understand or culturally define right
and wrong if we corrupt the definition of human nature and natural
human relationships?!
The real
forces of human social behavior
work along the same lines as pre-existing biological forces in
a sort of feedback loop between biology and culture, suggesting that
the political/cultural structure of an ethnopluralism of ethnostates
is the social structure most in harmony with real human nature and
natural human relationships, which remain kin-centered,
ethnocentric, and even xenophobic, among other traditional things.
So we now have
to struggle against these almost satanic odds, first to see if a way
already exists---as conservatives do---and if not, to forge a way
back to real human nature and natural human relationships. It turns
out that our Founding Fathers set up a constitutional separation of
powers and states which can be gradually and legally adapted to an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates and the return to real human nature and
natural human relationships. But the cultural criminals obviously
need to be stopped.
Wednesday, February 07, 2018
The cliches of modern liberalism reveal ignorance and just plain lies about human nature
The cliches of modern liberalism reveal
ignorance and just plain lies about human nature, which means the
modern liberal worldview advances such things, listed here by Chilton
Williamson Jr. (Chronicles, Feb 2018) as "...the present
welfare state (in which almost half the population pay no taxes and
unwed mothers are married to the government), the sexual revolution,
women’s liberation, gay marriage, transgenderism and the abolition
of the two sexes and the invention of several new ones, the erasure
of national borders, the melding and unification of national
cultures, the globalization of the economy, absolute freedom of
immigration and migration, forcible secularization and the
persecution of Christians, and the replacement of learning and
traditional education by insane propaganda ginned up in the advanced
kindergartens that are dignified today by the name of universities."
That is a shocking and twisted worldview.
The biological or genetic origin of
human nature actually strongly suggests affirming most of the very
things that modern liberals consider politically incorrect, or even define as
evil. Human nature has been affirmed throughout human history to
this day as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded,
heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even
xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with
group-selection as the primary unit of successful
selection, followed by individual
selection. This strongly suggests that the best political
configuration for humans beings to live within, given who we are, is an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this
human nature, with such experiments as Marxism and modern liberalism,
but culture is eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic
leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human
nature, and humans then can work within and adapt to the environments
they find themselves living in.
Lucky for us our Founding
Fathers, who were probably a bit too enamored with the universalism of their
time, also created a constitutional
separation of powers and states which can be adapted
to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates---if we can overcome the
ignorance and lies of modern liberalism.
Tuesday, February 06, 2018
The ethnostate option: independent religious communities and antitrust policies would not stop the civil disruptions mainly caused by natural ethnic competition
Although the five
Big Tech companies, Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and
Amazon, may be more left/libertarian than the liberalism of old Big
Media, they all campaigned with Hillary Clinton, and they all censor
conservatives---even as Big Tech tolerates and profits from gross
pornography which can be easily seen by our children.
We could apply antitrust policies that
really do break these huge corporations up, which are owned by many of
the same cabal, but they are so powerful and rich that they can
probably control antitrust policies. John Seiler Jr. of "Chronicles"
(Feb 2018) also writes about the Benedict option, suggested by Rod
Dreher, which takes inspiration from the option used by St. Benedict who after the fall of Rome built monasteries around which
civilization could be maintained and hopefully later rebuilt.
I think a deeper more long lasting
solution could be called the ethnostate option that would gradually separate
us not into religious communities but ethnic communities, which could
then ban whatever media they wanted to yet still follow the U.S.
constitutional separation of powers and states. That would be more in
line with real human nature, which remains kin-selecting, marriage-making, hierarchical, with a division of labor, gender
differentiation, localism, ethnocentrism, and even xenophobia
(group-selection trumps individual selection)---and all those basic
traits are mainly genetic traits developed over many thousand years.
Independent religious communities and antitrust
policies would not stop the civil disruptions mainly caused by natural ethnic competition: the ethnostate option would.
Monday, February 05, 2018
The big metaphysical error comes from thinking that the perfect state gives birth to the imperfect state
The big metaphysical error comes from
thinking that the perfect state gives birth to the imperfect state.
If the so-called perfect state is thought of as non-material and
spiritual then the material is seen as not good (even evil) and
imperfect.
But when Godhood is seen as existing on
the evolutionary material continuum leading to the supermaterial, as
I believe, then the world evolves from an imperfect state to a
verging-on-perfect state---verging-on-perfect because material life
and Godhood never stop evolving (and sometimes devolving.)
"Timelessness" and "infinity"
are also seen as another human invention: without material life
living in time there is no related connection to time or infinity and
they become as non-material-nothing as a non-material god.
The real relationship to Godhood, life,
and human life (or our being an "image" of God) is the
material and supermaterial connection, no invention of a spiritual or
non-material connection is necessary to explain our connection to
Godhood when Godhood is understood as material/supermaterial as we are and wish to be.
Saturday, February 03, 2018
The old theology caused a Great Spiritual Blockade against life evolving to real Godhood
If as I do you like the Occam's razor
idea, or the principle of parsimony, where the simplest, less
complicated definition is usually the best definition, and if you
also don't mind using the method of cutting the Gordian knot to solve
insoluble problems, then you won't be too surprised when I largely
bypass the Aristotelian, Neo-Platonic, Augustinian, Thomistic and
Rationalist proofs of God, as well as the Eastern thinkers (Vedic
thinkers) who defined God in much the same way, that is, God as
completely non-material and spiritual.
We don't have to reject the complicated
definitions of an entirely spiritual God, but we can see them as
over-complicated preliminary attempts to define the real Godhood reached only through the material evolution of life to
supermaterial Godhood. The old involutionary path with its spiritual
definition of God is transformed in the evolutionary path of material
life evolving to supermaterial Godhood, as seen in the Twofold Path
of theological materialism.
The old theology caused a Great
Spiritual Blockade against life evolving to real Godhood. Modern
science and modern culture largely rejected God and religion. I
believe theological materialism can bring them back, along with a
deep bonding and sacred purpose now missing in modern culture.
Friday, February 02, 2018
Non-college educated rednecks have a better grasp of reality than college-educated limousine liberals
Modern liberals think they know reality when they don't, which is why whenever they open their
mouths they seem so condescendingly arrogant. Rednecks of course
aren't perfect, they resent the wealthy a little too much.
This is a serious problem because
modern libels marched through the institutions, as the communist
Antonio
Gramsci
told them to do, and now they control the academic world, the
Big Media, and a large part of the business world. They are the ones
who want open borders with open immigration for everyone,
and they are the ones who promote general cultural Marxism mixed with
hedonism and immorality for popular culture, which is destroying America and the West.
It's
too late to save old America, the growing mix of ethnic groups and
cultures won't assimilate and naturally will aggressively or even violently compete. If we talk of taking the country back it wont be
the same country we take back. The biological traits of the people
create the culture more than the culture creates the people.
I
believe that saving America (and the West) will mean legally adapting
the constitutional separation of powers and states to an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and protecting the whole with a
decentralized federalism. Not a revolution but a constitutional,
legal, conservative, separation of regions and states into
ethnostates---already partially existing---where real human nature,
which remains kin-centered and ethnocentric, can live in relative
harmony.
Of
course this will not be easy but it will be better than letting the
nation descend into another open civil war---which is already
unofficially happening---that could then lead to totalitarianism on
the left or the right, or just chaos.
Thursday, February 01, 2018
Upside down metaphysics of origins
The problem with religious cosmogonies
is that they turn the origin of the cosmos and life upside down.
They begin with a highest God from whose androgynous non-material
Being the cosmos is created, which is considered a great falling away
from the highest to the lowest.
I believe it happens the other way
around. The lowest primal point of existence creates the beginning
cosmos which then must evolve, if it can, to the highest existence,
which is where real Godhood can exist.
That great metaphysical error has
created many atheists, and devalued the world, life in the world, religion, and
material evolution to real Godhood. It need not have.
The cosmos did not come from a
non-material, spiritual, androgynous being, which was a metaphysical
conception existing only in the minds of men who mainly dropped out
of the material world to create such non-life conceptions. Godhood
is a real and valid goal, but Godhood must be materially evolved to
from the material to the supermaterial.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)