Monday, September 14, 2015
A Conservatism Beyond Carl Schmitt
I don't mount an attack against the
Enlightenment or against pluralism, unlike most on the Right. And I
don't see the political leader as being allowed to make dictatorial
decisions, other than with temporary emergency powers, preserving the
constitutional law and order---but that exception should never prove
the rule. I think we can preserve the Constitution while retaining
pluralism, or more precisely ethnopluralism, and not replace
the constitution with some form of dictatorship.
Unlike Schmitt I think ethnopluralism
can be seen as founded in the “primordial condition.” The
primordial affirmation of ones own ethnic group and ethnic culture
relates to primordial human nature and the human preference for ones
own people, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection.
This need not overrule constitutional federalism and the separation
of powers and states in the U.S. Constitution, indeed it affirms it.
Our modern day crisis is more and more like the crisis of the Weimar
republic which eventually led to militant revolution and dictatorship
from the right (Hitlerism) and from the left (Leninism).
Unlike the far right and far left who seem to prefer dictatorships, and unlike most conservatives, I defend our Constitution and the separation of powers and
states but I see our Constitution as affirming the ethnopluralist solution to our present and
future civil and ethnic disruptions, without leading to the destruction of our Constitution and a
dictatorship of the left or the right.
Unlike Schmitt I do not see a hopeless,
endless, human battling that is solved only temporarily by
dictatorships (see “Agonistic Politics,” Chronicles, July 2015).
I see not agonistic politics but ethnopluralistic politics, with a
federalism protecting states and regions with distinct ethnic
cultures and ethnic people, which could be conservatively
accommodated by the separation of powers and states in the U. S.
Constitution.
What are the obstacles to
ethnopluralism? The promotion of universalism on the left and
dictatorship on the right. Both define their enemies as “absolute
enemies,” leading to thinking of the enemy as non-human and even as
vermin (now ISIS does this). Hitlerism, Leninism and even
ultra-orthodox Judaism tend to consider the enemy as vermin and
therefore they shatter the order of any natural ethnopluralism.
Last but not least, no great
civilization rose or sustained itself without being founded in
religion, and ethnopluralism can be founded in the theological materialism of the Twofold Path, which affirms the material evolution
of ethnopluralistic life, to supermaterial Godhood.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment