Tuesday, May 26, 2015
What the “ecological economists” have right is the idea that nature is ultimately the source of wealth
What the “ecological economists”
have right is the idea that nature is ultimately the source of wealth
and if we destroy nature we destroy future wealth, along with destroying
many other things. This suggests, or should suggest, that endless growth
as an economic philosophy can be unhealthy.
This also relates to the unhealthy dominance of
economic forces. Yes we can have market's free or fair, but we cannot
be dominated by markets as we have been in the West, which has
largely destroyed the cultures and the nations of the West. Yes, free
enterprise has raised the standard of living higher than any time in
human history, but it can become that old root of all evil when it
dominates well-bonded communities, local governments, ethnic
cultures, and everything else.
Can this be changed? We have no choice
if we want to continue living. We will be more “free” the more we
restrict the power of Big Money/Big Business which has become a
marauding international global state. Big Business claimed to be
against the communists but they have promoted an international
“brotherhood” and a border-less world as the communist did, which
is just as impossible.
I think the change can be done without
radical revolution and without rejecting the vision of the Founding
Fathers. Human nature remains kin-centered, ethnocentric, local, even
xenophobic, and group selection is still the primary unit of
selection, and this relates directly to the separation of powers and
states in the U.S. Constitution.
Libertarians usually don't embrace
economic nationalism, and that's a problem with them, their
philosophy of hypertrophied individualism has not absorbed the
importance of the primary unit of group selection in
successful survival, which is deeply ingrained in human nature. This
means that libertarian decentralization will not be enough, if open
border, free trade globalism remains. We require tariffs on foreign
products to save manufacturing, and save jobs, and save lives, and
save cultures that have been destroyed by globalism. Economic
nationalism is not isolationism, or anti-technology, or anti-trade,
or anti-free enterprise, endless growth as an economic philosophy
has been unhealthy, and we must admit this.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment