Response to the White House correspondents' dinner: the dangerous deceit of multiculturalism

While president Obama was amusing everyone with his “anger translator” at the correspondents' dinner, real anger was exploding in a West Baltimore neighborhood, with black mobs breaking windows, rioting, etc. which is lately becoming almost commonplace. Recently Somali immigrants in Minnesota (of all places) are angry and protesting against the police because the police are holding Islamic terrorist recruits from their community.

Most people know but can't say out loud that "multiculturalism" has meant open ethnic pride for minorities but not for whites. Speaking the truth openly today means hurting yourself. For example, the latest figures I know of from the New Century Foundation in 2005 (which may be changed somewhat by now) found that: “Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against other blacks. Forty-five percent of the victims of violent crime by blacks are white folks, 43 percent are black, 10 percent are Hispanic. Blacks are seven times as likely as people of other races to commit murder, eight times more likely to commit robbery and three times more likely to use a gun in a crime. Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit violent crime against a white person than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery. Black-on-white rape is 115 times more common than the reverse. (If decent black folks have trouble being racially profiled these numbers may help explain it.)”

This is not to say that there is no unfair racial bias, of course there is. But why don't blacks police themselves?

Speaking of deeper but related things, by rejecting real human nature our educational system and the media in general have doomed the nation to constant civil disturbances and even eventual civil war. Why? Human nature remains as it has always been, kin-centered, ethnocentric, and even xenophobic, and no amount of forced “multiculturalism” within the same living space will lead to homogeneity and peace. That is the reality of human nature.

The separation of powers and states in the original U. S. Constitution could accommodate, if we wanted it to, a realistic ethnopluralism with separate regions and states for distinct ethnic cultures within our federation, which might then help bring whatever peace and harmony is possible for human beings. Otherwise civil war will probably create these things---The same ethnic social dynamics applies to Europe and the rest of the world...I could support only a legal movement of ethnopluralism, but I can't predict its chances of taking place very soon.