When we try to think beyond the grounds
of our own biological organs of knowledge then falsification and
wish-fulfillment can take place. The task is to try to be in harmony
with nature and biology and not to create fantasies that move outside
of nature and biology. That is not “limiting” ourselves to
biology, we have no choice.
We use organs created by their own
survival needs, but this does not mean we cannot know what we are.
We don't need to be “free” from what we are to largely know what
we are, in any case we cannot be free from what we are.
What's wrong with the criterion for
truth being related to the biological of the survival of the
species? Is that not enough? How can that be a falsification of the
true and the real?
Why was religion and Godhood not firmly
connected to our biological utility? It needs to be connected. Our
evolution toward Godhood in nature reconnects the criterion for truth
to biology.
It is not thinking beyond what we are
to use the organs of survival to reason our own hypertrophied biological survival in our
evolution to the zenith of survival, which is Godhood. This is “faith”
and reason connected to nature and biology, where it is, and where it belongs.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment