No need for Nietzsche's radical revolution

Nietzsche said that the belief in the body is more fundamental than the belief in the soul. But what if, as I believe, the soul is of the body, as a condition, a state, where one can enter and experience the God or Father Within, that is, if  like a monk one manages to block or unattach oneself from material desires? The point is that these spiritual things are material or supermaterial, including the soul and the spirit-will, and most importantly including Godhood, which is evolved to in the material/supermaterial world. Was it therefore necessary to murder a definition of God that did not exist, or kill a Father Within which only exists in the Inward Path to the experience of the material/supermaterial soul?

Related to this is the vital point that we can retain much of the old religion, the old God Within, as the first symbolic glimpse and symbol of real Godhood reached by material evolution. There was no need for Nietzsche's  revolution against religion, other than that it probably helped 100 years later to define real supermaterial Godhood. Conservatism is wise and realistic to include the past in the future.