Monday, May 27, 2013
Can we have competitive evolution without primitive war?
On this Memorial Day I was thinking of
how Raymond Cattell, with his fearless eye, called war a degenerate
form of competition, yet he questioned mankind trying to rule out all
competition in a hedonistic pact.
Whether we like to admit it or not war has been
a test of the power of group survival, but it would be far better to
see a higher level of testing between groups through cooperative
competition. Yet realism says that cooperative competition in the world
would still need to be backed by force, since we are an imperfectly evolved
species. Power vacuums won't control invading power.
If we care about advancing in evolution
we need to somehow rationally allow for expansion and
contraction, that is, the evolution of groups. We can't block
evolution, we will have explosions if we do. It will greatly help
when we all can see the full importance of distinct groups having
their own regions, virtually their own ethnostates, no matter how
small. Competition within the same species is always greater
than competition between different species, each species tends to
find its own niche. Separation is vital for peace. Each group can
then get on with the challenges of evolution within nature itself.
The United States of America, my country, made a start in its original Constitution, with its
separation of powers and states.
The idea is to have all groups, all
nations, jointly exploring and advancing in evolution without
primitive wars, and, yes, we can suppress war without suppressing
evolution.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment