Friday, May 17, 2013
Blocking the particular in the universal
Universal values calling for the
sameness of all people tend to be weaker than the particular values
of group and individual survival. Religions have usually
identified universal values and devalued the particular, even though they make little offerings to the particular, at least for laymen.
The difficulty comes from placing too
much value on the Inward Path to the God Within (or the Father
Within) which is universal, and not enough value, or even blocking
entirely, the Outward Path of evolution to Godhood. The Outward Path
affirms material evolution, group selection and cooperative natural
competition, the Inward Path blocks them.
Cattell and other psychologists have
suggested that frustrated genetic urges which were unsatisfied led to
beliefs to fit the frustrations. To me this suggests that the
frustrations of natural life and selection led to religiously trying
to block these drives and dwelling in the desire-free state
of the God Within.
The healthier path would be to successfully fulfill
the natural genetic urges, or at least develop cooperative competition to
allow more than one group to fulfill their genetic imperatives.
The Twofold Path remedies this
historical and imperialist religious mistake of trying to make the particular universal. The Inward Path to the God Within is transformed, not blocked, because we are evolving to the
God first seen inwardly as a mirror of outward Godhood. This is the
next religious philosophy attached to the old, this is the new, psychologically healthier, stage in
religious development.
A side point to this is that political
philosophy has often made this same mistake trying to block the
particular with the universal. There are no large “perfect” societies
full of universal saints or world altruists mainly because natural evolving life will not be blocked.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment