Monday, April 09, 2012
Universal and Specific Ethics
As Raymond Cattell pointed out, the
common ethics of universalism (eg. in the Revealed Religions, and in
Marxism) are centered around basic survival for all of us, for the
world. However, if only common basic ethics are allowed, there can
be little creativity or evolution (remember the Spanish Inquisition,
and Stalinism).
A natural separation of the world into
small states allows for a more specific ethics related to place
and time. That is, more creativity in ethics along with the
common universal ethics of basic global survival. This way
evolutionary change can take place, which is the basis of natural
life, as well as the basis of our sacred mission to evolve to
Godhood.
It is important to state that we
require evolution not revolution, this is a central point in
Revitalized Conservatism. The new needs to be synthesized into the
old. Old conservatism must include new sociobiology. The ethics of
traditional conservatism is grounded in the God-Within of the Inward
Path. The inclusion of the Outward Path of evolution to Godhood,
along with the Inward Path, needs to be affirmed, and it is affirmed
in the Theoevolutionary Church.
Conserving “the best elements of our
civilization” as called for by Russell Kirk, means not only
conserving the ethical elements of the Inward Path to the God Within,
but conserving the highest truth, goodness and beauty of various
people and states,
sociobiologically, all of whom are on the evolutionary Path to Godhood in
the cosmos.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment