Being is not concealed but is highest evolved

The main difference between Being and being is the evolutionary level of each.  I don't see Being
"withdrawing” into any kind of “oblivion,” or immutability. Being is not “concealed,” Being is the Highest Evolved Object in the Kosmos, which does set Being apart from the rest of the Kosmos, but only in regard to the level of evolution.

Being primordially “withdraws” only as much as reproduction could be considered withdrawal when the parent transforms into the offspring, thereby, with Godhood, giving the Parent eternal representation in the primordial elements of the new kosmos, which is the Great Reward for life evolving to Godhood. The Spirit-Will reaches It's own Great Destination when material life attains supermaterial Godhood.

At this point I see no need for Heidegger's overly difficult “Ereignis,” the “event of appropriation,” the oblivion of Being, etc., in explaining the “bestowing” of Being. What bestows Being? At first glance it looks like the activating Spirit-Will, as the activating drive of evolution, bestows Being as well as bestowing beings in the cosmos. Such natural things as Big Bangs in old cosmos contain the old Spirit-Will of Godhood, which activates life to evolve to Godhood again.

The things defined as "concealed"  in the world by philosophy are often principals or definitions which philosophy supposedly unconceals, they are only non-object principals or definitions and not real living objects, they bestow nothing but the non-living principals or definitions, bestowed by the philosopher.