Art and Sexual Selection
Art seems to have grown out of sexual selection, if so, then women should be better at discerning art, because they have needed to be acute in judging the authenticity of men, since they pay a heavier price with the long-term care of babies if they judge wrong. But the desire of men to impress women might help explain, at least unconsciously, why their are more top men artists and male art critics than women. Homosexuals in the arts, at least in these times, might also explain some of the disparities in the sexual selection-discernment hypothesis.
This gets confusing when we consider the
stereotypical common man who says he hasn't a clue as to what color
goes with what, especially since men are trying to impress women in
sexual selection and should therefore care about the way they look.
Perhaps women give central importance to the money or position a man
has, at least beyond the teen years, and they just kind of overlook
his lack of color harmonizing.
In any case, this connection
with sexual selection is probably the way to study art origins (see
Dutton's “The Art Instinct) ), which gets us away from the absurd
and phony abstractions that define postmodern art. High art (low art
too) can then be seen sociobiologically as an affirmation of what the
group holds sacred, since the group is the main unit of selection
over the long term.
Modern art as attack more
than art
Atonal music actively
attacked tonal music, otherwise tones would have now and then
occurred, Schoenberg had to consciously avoid tones, as Dutton
pointed out. But modern art in general does
this too, actively attacking realism, meaning and order, as if to
destroy it. Why? Why the anger? Why the desire to destroy? And they
were triumphant! They conquered the art world!
People have
not, by and large, to this day accepted contratonal music or
modern/postmodern art, in spite of its strong promotion, and in spite
of the taunts that people are just too lazy to appreciate it. The
human mind is not infinitely malleable, not a blank slate. People
prefer meaning, order, which are evolutionary traits developed in the
minds of our Paleolithic ancestors, mainly because this strengthened
social health and helped us survive. Individual artists also used art
in the game of sexual selection. Real art throughout human history
grew out of these dynamics and out of this human nature.
This
says to me that atonal music and modern art were not really a
legitimate development in art history but were mainly an attack on
the order and meaning of Western culture, more like an abortion, as
someone once called it. Who did the attacking, and why? This needs to
be brought out more. Was there a pattern? Names, groups, need
to be named. I know years ago Tom Wolfe did a great job in “The
Painted Word” exposing the sham of modern art, but more needs to be
done, as we try to exhume the meaning of real art from the old
battlefield.
No comments:
Post a Comment