The charge of “racism” and “sexism” usually show a complete ignorance of human nature

The charge of “racism” and “sexism” usually show a complete ignorance of human nature. Stereotypes and gender roles and racial/ethic differences between peoples are said to be only social constructions, having nothing to do with biological differences between peoples. But the belief that one sex, gender, or race is intrinsically superior to another is also wrong, we are simply different from one another with different mainly biologically derived talents and abilities.

The biological origin of our social behavior as empirically explained by sociobiology actually ends the sham intellectual charge of racism and sexism. Across history and across the world human nature IS biologically and genetically kin and ethnic centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, territorial, and even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

Real human nature can be blocked, subverted, or it can be unknown to us, but it can't legitimately be intellectually or instinctively denied. Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against the biological origin of our social behavior, with such social experiments as postmodernism, Marxism, feminism, and multiculturalism, but the cultures are eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature.

Reason and common sense suggest that real human nature leads naturally to regionalism, localism, and eventully to an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by a defensive federalism. Given who we are this appears to be the best way all of us can optimize the gene expression we inherited from our human ancestors.