Monday, February 24, 2020
The affirmation of the sacred in evolutionary art (from 2013)
In an essay on the various
views of art regarding nature, Peter
Kellow points out that Roger Scruton suggests our attitude toward
art is not much different from our attitude toward natural beauty,
but Kellow says that Kant saw a difference in that art is a
presentation of a
beautiful thing whereas natural beauty is a beautiful thing.
I think serious or high
art has always been an affirmation of the things that we have
held sacred, which included religion, nature and human beauty,
unserious or bad art did not affirm the sacred. But popular art or
low art often still included a portrayal of the sacred or high art
but with less sophistication. The highest art affirmed Godhood, which
was valued higher than nature or human beings although these things
were included in the overall affirmation of the sacred.
Much depends on how we
define God or Godhood. When Godhood is defined as the supreme life we
evolve to in nature, then nature and human beings, and future
species, become a vital part of the sacred path to Godhood, and the
subject of art---the beings evolving to Godhood in nature, and nature
from which they evolve out of, are nearly as sacred in art as the
Godhood they are evolving to.
I think evolutionary
realism is the form of art that can best affirm this view of the
sacred, although the artists can feel free to create anyway and
anything they want to, knowing sacred art is the ideal art which gets
the commissions. Definitions of human beauty relate to Godhood as the
zenith of beauty, and so perhaps the ancient Greeks were on the right
track in their idealized realistic art creations of the Gods. Modern
art forms have been mainly devoid of the sacred, or they hold
individual hedonistic expression as “sacred,” and reaching a
social audience has not been a concern of theirs, they tend to
communicate only with each other or with critics hip to their
experimentations, as Tom Wolfe wrote about so well.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment