Evolution and conservatism

Continuing evolution takes place best in conservative environments where the best of the past can be retained even as we continue evolving higher talent and beauty; those who shout radical revolution, or worse, whenever human evolution is spoken of are wrong. Genetic engineering will speed up the process of human evolution but conserving the best of the past will remain a principle part of our evolution.

Altruism or being for others was evolved from races competing with outside groups, which required altruism within groups to be successful against other groups who may have been less altruistic within their group. So altruistic genes survived, and group selection remains today the central unit of selection, as E.O.Wilson has recently affirmed.

In a better world attuned to real human nature, which remains kin and ethnic centered, ethnic groups will have their own ethnostates, and that would define deep conservatism. As the scientist Raymond Cattell suggested, ethnic groups should be allowed their own evolutionary development, permitting scientific conclusions regarding traits favoring group survival and evolution.

Fox TV conservative's proclaim a conservatism of ideas not race and excoriate modern liberals for featuring race and gender, but Fox conservative's fail to understand that the problem is that liberals proclaim and champion only minority races and make whites the enemy. If the liberals proclaimed the right of every race and ethnic group to be who they are, even within their own ethnostates, then they would be more deeply conservative than the Fox TV conservatives---all liberals would have to do is include whites when they feature race, and of course stop being cultural Marxists.