Sunday, March 31, 2019
Demographics activate American politics, with the help of fools like "Beto" O Rourke
Demographics activate
American politics, it is the main driving force beneath the push of
reverse racism, speech codes, the criminalization of "hate
speech," political correctness (cultural Marxism), big
government, open immigration, and the predatory version of
capitalism. The electoral power of whites is fading in America
while the population of other ethnic groups has sharply risen and
will soon overtake white America.
Helping along this
demographic change in American politics are dipsticks like "Beto"
O Rourke (Beto is, of course, a Spanish nickname for Robert) who has
the habit of being wrong loudly and often. He is that breed of modern
white who satiate
themselves in exaggerated altruism for ethnic groups other than their
own. He waves his arms around when he speaks perhaps hoping it will
beholden him to rap singers who do the same thing but who nevertheless only
think of him as a useful fool. The Kennedys and Bill Clinton applied
the same exaggerated altruism for ethnic groups other than their
own, but beneath their ethnic demagoguery they had the morals of
street whores, which I suppose is to be expected from people who turn
their backs on their own ethnic group and culture.
Whites
are good at the hypertrophied altruism that is activating the
demographic changes in American politics, they do it better than any
other race because altruism was more necessary to survival in the
north and it was genetically programmed into whites---in contrast we can see the
unabashed ethnocentrism of nonwhites in America, which is actually
healthier than dipstick white altruism and cuckoldry.
Since
the the demographic changes in America look inevitable, especially
with the help of fools like Beto O Rourke, eventually the only realistic way to
save white America---and save American culture, because different ethnic groups create different cultures---will be to harken back to the natural separation
of regions and states enshrined in the Constitution, which can be
home to a variety of ethnic groups in ethnostates.
Friday, March 29, 2019
The name of this blog, "Civilizing the Beast," does not refer to civilizing "Satan"
To those it concerns: the
name of this blog, "Civilizing the Beast," does not refer
to civilizing "Satan." I am not a Satanist. The name
refers to the civilizing process of materially evolving from the
frogs to the Gods. But this does concede that the material world is
not evil since we evolve to real Godhood by way of material evolution
with all the woes and joys of life that flesh is heir to. If anything
it was evil of ascetics to blockade this sacred evolutionary
process.
That said, with the
Twofold Path we can have both the Inward Path to the symbolic God
within, the path of the ascetics, as the preliminary path to the
Outward Path of material evolution to ascending levels of real
Godhood, the path of the non-ascetics who developed evolutionary
science. So if we can accept change within tradition conservatives
can rest easier.
Thursday, March 28, 2019
On the origin of a separation between religion and politics
If you think about human
behavior from the perspective of the biological origin of social
behavior the hallowed separation between religion and politics
doesn't look so hallowed. The separation seems to have developed
mainly in Judaic-Christian societies as the result of trying to
accommodate multicultural and multiracial societies.
The Hebrew tribes were
continually dominated by the Persians, the Greeks, the Syrians and
Egypt, and the Romans, and they survived by having a separation
between religion and politics in multicultural and multiracial
societies. This conception fed into Christianity and the founding of
America.
That separation between
religion and politics continued to be necessary to Jewish survival
right up to the twentieth century founding of Israel---and it is
still important for Jews living in multicultural and multiracial
societies like America and Europe.
It seems common sense
that moral and political bonds are stronger in homogeneous societies
with less survival need for a separation between religion and
politics, perhaps like present day Israel, which has moved ever
closer to having no separation between religion and politics---now
that they have their own land the presence of Palestinians in their
midst seems to have led them not to a multicultural society but to an
even more nationalistic Israel.
It should be obvious that
multicultural and multiracial societies breed resentment in the
population. Nietzsche hypertrophied "resentment" as at the origin of the development of Judaic-Christian societies, he
therefore rejected religion preferring the winning Greeks and Romans
to the Jews and Christians who they enslaved---underplaying the vital
bonding qualities of religion.
In any case, this is one
more reason why I think ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of
ethnostates are desirable, they have less of the squabbling and
competition of multicultural and multiracial societies which ends up
weakening and even destroying them. It also explains why it is
difficult to develop ethnostates in Judaic-Christian societies
founded on the separation between religion and politics.
If Israel---now having less survival need for a separation between religion and politics---can move toward a more homogeneous ethnostate, why can't the
U. S. develop ethnostates where the moral and
political bonds can be stronger in homogeneous societies which have
less survival need for a separation between religion and politics?
In the U. S. an ethnopluralism of ethnostates could legally work in harmony with
federalism and the Constitutional separation of powers and states.
Wednesday, March 27, 2019
The list ringing the death knell of America supported by both political parties
Both political parties
more or less support reverse racism, speech codes, the
criminalization of "hate speech," political correctness
(cultural Marxism), feminism, sexuality as "fluid," gay
marriage, transgenderism, abortion on demand, big government, and a
predatory version of capitalism. Both political parties are against
homophobia, ageism, ableism, and xenophobia. Both political parties
support universalism, globalism, unselective immigration,
cosmopolitanism, and multiculturalism. Both political parties allow
our schools to be what amounts to Marxist education centers. And
both political parties allow the Big Media to be centers for gross
disinformation. (The list was cataloged at various times in the
conservative journal "Chronicles.")
What can actually
counter this list? I think the default social force is the
return to real human nature which can rise again and project real
human traits on our social behavior and cultures. We can counter the
death knell by first admitting that human nature is and always has
been genetically kin and ethnic centered, that is, racist and
ethnocentric. Ironically those who are most against racism and
ethnocentrism are usually doing so for ethnocentric reasons; they use
the charge of racism to block other groups and to advance their own
group, consciously or unconsciously. So the ethnocentrism and racism
of human nature prevails in any case.
A wise man said, "that which has
been tearing us apart could put us back together again." Rather than fighting
ethnocentrism we can affirm and develop ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of
ethnostates for all groups.
It took
the whole history of humanity to discover the counter-intuitive idea
that we could stop polio, measles, etc, by infecting people with a
strain of the virus that taught the immune system how to deal with
the disease. In the U. S. ethnostates and an ethnopluralism could work in harmony with federalism and the Constitutional
separation of powers and states. But the return to ethnostates would
best be done legally,
constitutional, not by radical or revolutionary means which almost
never work and cause great biological and cultural disruptions and
convulsions.
Will we do it? I think human nature will do it, one way or another.
Monday, March 25, 2019
It is overdo time to stop the blockade of correctly defining patriots and nations
How long must it be before
we can speak again of patriots and nations as races and ethnic
groups? By any realistic and unpolitical definition "nations"
are made of distinct races and ethnic groups of common descent
usually occupying a definite territory. Even the conservatives are
browbeat
and intimidated against defining
nations that way.
Any realistic and
unpolitical definition of human nature sees human nature as
kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual,
marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, territorial, and even
xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with
group-selection as the primary unit of successful
selection, followed by individual
selection. This is why humans create nations made of distinct races
and ethnic groups of common descent, this is why ethnostates and an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates naturally form.
Why do nations defined as
races and ethnic groups continue to be compared to Hitler or National
Socialism and presented that way to people who defeated him? Who benefits? Not real patriots and nationalists. It is overdo time to stop the blockade of correctly defining patriots and nations.
Saturday, March 23, 2019
Ethnostates as the default social force in world history
In his excellent journal
"Chronicles" (Feb 2019) Chilton Williamson suggests that
populism is more or less the default social force in world history,
from the right or the left, which rises against dominant classes that
have taken over and who disfavor the normal natural behavior of the
classes below them. I think of the default social force as
the return of real human nature rising again and projecting its
traits on our social behavior and cultures.
What are the traits of
human nature which always rise and influence the shape of our
cultures? You hear it here often, human nature is basically
kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual,
marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, territorial, and even
xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with
group-selection as the primary unit of successful
selection, followed by individual selection. Cultures can
operate for a time with behavior that goes against this human nature,
with such experiments as Marxism, but cultures are eventually pulled
back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to
cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans then work
within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in.
We could think of human
nature as the structure upon which cultures, governments, etc. rise
as a superstructure. The superstructure then becomes so gross and
oversized (think empires) that it falls apart. But the foundation
structure grounded in real human nature remains intact because even
the smallest change in human nature and our DNA structure, for
example, in our immune system, takes hundreds of thousands of years
to change (although now we have genetic engineering which may be more
rapid),
I think a clear-eyed and
courageous view of human nature and the biological origin of our
social behavior suggests that the default social force, driven by
real human nature, is a return to ethnostates and an ethnopluralism
of ethnostates. In the U. S. that could work in sync with federalism
and the Constitutional separation of powers and states. This return
to ethnostates would best be done legally,
constitutional, and not by radical or revolutionary means which
almost never work and cause great biological and cultural disruptions
and convulsions.
Friday, March 22, 2019
Intellectual intuition
Traditional religions and
philosophies like to say that ants and bees cooperate by instinct but
people must have revelation and reason. When people talk about
instincts they are really talking about determined genes and the biological
origin of our social behavior, which includes revelation and reason.
Anthropocentrism regards
the world in terms of human values and experiences and usually
considers instincts as mainly for inferior animals and far below
revelation and reason.
Moving beyond using only the dialectical circuitous routes of many philosophies, "intellectual intuition" can bring us to the core of
knowledge. The words and ideas of modern philosophers are like a game
for indoor nerds.
We have ignored the
deepest activation of material life where the instinctive
sacredness exists, we have preferred words and ideas unconnected to
the real material world. We have only circled around the path to
where real Godhood is seen as the material evolution of life to
ascending levels of supermaterial Godhood, which works along with and
adapts to outside natural evolution. Now with the science of genetic
selection, equitably guided, we can aid in the sacred path to
Godhood---religion and science can end their prolonged feud.
Why not use all
routes, revelation, reason, science, instinct, art, in seeking the
truth? Specializing has left a lot to be desired.
Thursday, March 21, 2019
The film "The Favourite" disses its betters
I'm more of a regionalist than a royalist, and if Western civilization wasn't falling apart there might be time for this excellent but obscene comedic attack against 18th-century English royalty and aristocracy, but Western civilization is falling apart.
The artists in the film "The Favourite" have that odd modern talent of creating excellent acting and directing even though the themes and philosophy of their movies are degenerate, decadent, immoral and destructive. Colman deserved her Academy Award.
I suppose this comes from
being brainwashed in culturally Marxist schools, private and public,
along with the malevolent culturally Marxist Media, all of whom hate
old white history, all royalty, all aristocracy, all Northern
Europeans, and all real Western excellence.
Nothing else needs to said about this film, which disses its betters.
Wednesday, March 20, 2019
We can face the truth about our stupid and suicidal immigration and asylum laws, can't we?!
Does it really still have
to be said that people are not the same, different ethnic groups
create different cultures due to different genes and different
environments? The decadent West can't even admit this!
Liberal decadence has all
but destroyed Western civilization mainly as the result of stupid and
suicidal immigration and asylum laws. But it is a more deliberate
wreckage on the part of some businessmen who seek cheap labor at any
cost (this would include the
slave owners in the old South), or non-Northern European ethnic groups who gain power by deliberately weakening the Northern Europeans who founded America and the West.
History has shown us that
distinctly different ethnic groups don't melt they compete, so we are
in for tough times in the West. Is it too late to radically and
immediately revise the immigration and asylum laws in America and the
West? The demographics, the specific segment of a population having
shared characteristics, is probably too mixed now to to recover.
My position is that we
need a conservative, legal, and nonviolent return to ethnostates,
which could apply or adapt the U.S. Constitutional separation of
powers and states to an ethnopluralism of regions and states. I
believe real recovery
will come when we all return to ethnostates, which can be protected
by federalism. But who knows if this will prevail over illegal and
violent methods.
Tough words and tough
predictions, I know, but we can face the truth about our stupid and
suicidal immigration and asylum laws, can't we?!
Tuesday, March 19, 2019
Regarding Senator Elizabeth Warren: ignorance of human nature and realism is no excuse for destroying the United States
Goofy
Harvard intellectual Senator Elizabeth Warren and the loopy left
are now pushing and end to the Electoral
College, in addition to pushing other idiotic things like raising
taxes and destroying incentives for the most successful and creative
Americans. The
Electoral College makes candidates pay
attention to all the states and reinforces the role of the state in
federalism by giving power to electors in each state for the purpose of electing the president and vice president of the United
States.
We should be going in the
opposite direction from ending
the Electoral College and give more
power to the states, even to the extent of becoming ethnostates and
an ethnopluralism of ethnostates so that we are more in harmony with
real kin-centered and ethnic-centered human nature. Without these amendments the
U.S. will continue its slide toward more social disruptions and
ethnic civil war.
Ignorance of human nature
and realism in no excuse for destroying
the United States.
Monday, March 18, 2019
Why conservative things will return, one way or another
In arguing against all the
things that are tearing America and the West apart, conservative's
rarely mention the deep biological origin of our social behavior,
perhaps because they think it intrudes on the works of God as the
maker of all things. And liberal's blindly consider such a statement
evil and racist. But the biological origin of our social behavior is
nevertheless true, even if it is virtually banned in some countries
to say so.
When traditional
conservative's argue against such things as the excessive love of money, fame,
pleasure, the acceptance of homosexuality, abortion, one night
stands, and the general party-on hedonism, they overlook the best
sociobiological argument against these things: human nature is biologically kin-centered, gender
defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical,
ethnocentric, territorial, and even xenophobic, and religious-making,
among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of
successful selection,
followed by individual selection. Conservatism affirms most of these
things, and modern liberalism does not.
People and cultures can
operate for a time with behavior that goes against biological
human nature with such experiments as the excessive love of money, fame,
pleasure, the acceptance of homosexuality, abortion, one night
stands, a general party-on hedonism, cultural Marxism, etc. etc., but
our social behavior and our cultures are eventually pulled back by the
biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that
better reflect real human nature, and humans then work within and
adapt to the environments they find themselves living in.
So such conservative
things as being gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual,
marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, territorial, and even
xenophobic, and religious-making, with group-selection as the primary
unit of successful selection will return. We can help them along or hinder them, but these things will return, one way
or another, and by any rational or instinctive measurement that is good for life and its continuance.
Saturday, March 16, 2019
If you go by the numbers, Affirmative Action programs have hurt far more worthy students than the rich cheaters
What's more unfair,
wealthy parents paying and cheating to get their children into good
colleges, or tax-payers and wealthy donors paying for Affirmative
Action programs that place minority ethnic groups with lower SAT
scores in good colleges?
Today Fox News
(more neoconservative than conservative) brought on a black youth from
a poor family who tried hard and has been accepted in good schools as
a contrast to the rich cheaters. Good for him, but I'll bet he had help from Affirmative Action programs that choose by
quotas rather than merit or SAT scores, which has hurt far more worthy students than the rich cheaters.
The same sort of
unfairness takes place in putting far more money into programs for
slow learners than in programs for gifted students. It is the gifted
who have the best chance of improving the world, as well as improving
the lives of minorities.
Is there some sort of
epidemic of masochism or cuckoldry taking place in the West? Or is it
more likely the will to power of people who gain power by destroying
the merit system in the West?
Friday, March 15, 2019
Regarding the New Zealand mosque mass shootings yesterday: why does history repeat itself?
Several thinkers have said
that history repeats itself, although always with variations. Why?
While
we certainly condemn the violence of the New Zealand mosque mass
shootings yesterday, we should also place the blame for such violence
on the heads of the liberals and neoconservatives who have not only
promoted and encouraged multicultural/multi-ethnic societies but
slandered anyone who predicated these terrible outcomes for
multicultural multi-ethnic societies.
History repeats itself
because human nature and the natural world have remained essentially
the same since humans became humans, although with variations.
Human's adapted to different environments by evolving distinctly
different ethnic groups and races but human nature remained basically
the same for all, that is kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded,
heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric,
territorial, and even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other
things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful
selection, followed by individual selection.
Cultures can operate for a
time with behavior that goes against real human nature with such
experiments as globalist Marxism, but cultures are eventually pulled
back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to
cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans then work
within and adapt to the natural environments they find themselves
living in.
That is why history
repeats itself, and that is also why the reality of human nature and
of past history point toward the political/cultural solution of
ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups.
Ethnopluralism is a conservative transformation---not
revolution--which is the sociopolitical or political/cultural
structure most in harmony with real human nature and the natural
world.
It
has been mostly ignorance that has kept us from seeing why
history repeats itself, not Satan. Is
ignorance an excuse? The legal principle ignorantia
juris non excusat or ignorantia legis neminem excusat, "ignorance
of the law excuses not" and "ignorance of law excuses no
one." But it has been human nature itself with its
genetic tendency toward being ethnocentric, territorial, and
xenophobic that has kept us from seeing that the best long term
political/cultural solution for all is to allow the formation of
ethnostates, and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups.
Thursday, March 14, 2019
Will globalist neocons, neoliberals, and their lobbies, continue to decide our politics?
Globalism has been
deciding politics for some time now, the "global supply chain"
is protected at all costs. That is unhinged hypertrophied
capitalism, but it doesn't mean socialism is the alternative,
economic nationalism is the alternative, one that nevertheless trades
with the world.
That was President Trump's
tone or emphasis which appealed to the Trump supporters who elected
him. Will he hold to it? Even if he is ultimately out to make more
money for Trump Incorporated, if the money comes from economic
nationalism I think that would be OK with his followers---although it
is better to have politician's not ruled by money or special interest
groups, odd as that sounds in today's world.
Will Trump be defeated by
the globalist neocons and neoliberals who are totally backed by (or
own) the Big Media, Hollywood, and the big
academic faculties? Many globalist's care only
about money and are politically libertarian individualists, but some
globalist's are politically group-oriented and support ethnocentric
causes. Will they continue to define and decide
politics?
Populist nationalism and economic nationalism are
rising all over the world and the globalist's
are having problems containing it. Globalism does
seem to be heading for a high
and tight hair cut. Will
they turn to fascism on the left or the right to contain it? That
wouldn't surprise us.
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
The TV stars and coaches charged in college bribery scheme must not have realized that the political correctness of cultural Marxism has already trashed our colleges
That
trashing of our colleges by cultural
Marxists has been especially true of the Ivy League schools, so
getting into these trashed schools has little or nothing to do with
becoming educated.
I suppose graduating from an Ivy League school still impresses some employers, or excites people who care only about the illusion of status. And science departments seem less brainwashed by political correctness than the totally trashed humanities.
"Things fall apart;
the centre cannot hold" wrote Yeats way back in 1919, and that
describes our educational system. Who or what trashed our schools?
Mainly it was trashing the merit system. Our educational policies are
now shaped by choosing people not based on their merits but rather
by their race, or their political views, or connections to the
colleges.
It might be good if the whole educational system was trashed along with fools and liars who administrate it. Then we could return to schools based on real merit...Maybe that will happen later when we separate into more equitable ethnostates.
Tuesday, March 12, 2019
What isn't said is that the truths, the character, tone and guiding beliefs, the ethos of the revealed religions, have their source in asceticism
When we hear that all lies have their source in Satan, the father of lies, and all truth is Christian truth, we need to understand that we are seeing the world from the point of view of ascetics. What isn't said is that the truths, the character, tone and guiding beliefs, the ethos of the revealed religions have their source in asceticism. That is, in a lifestyle of abstinence from sensual pleasures, including celibacy, while pursuing spiritual goals, withdrawing from the world, and general renunciation. Christ lived that way, so did Buddha, and thousands of ascetics before them, which is where the values and morals they preached came from.
That was not a practical source of values and morals for the much larger population of non-ascetics, so in the West at least ascetic values were reinterpreted for the people, and the central ascetic goals of the religion were toned down, or not featured.
The Hindus, perhaps the oldest religion on earth derived from the Vedas, found a wise way to handle this dilemma by saying that man has to go through four stages of life. The first, as described by Vandana Singhal, is the "Brahmachari (or a bachelor or you can say a student life). The second is Grihasta meaning a householder. The third is the Vanaprasta or the one who dwells in the forest in a semi-retired state. The fourth is the Sannyasi known as the renounced or a person who has left the material world...The four stages of life represent training, creation, service and retirement...These four stages of life known as Ashramas, gain your fulfillment."
Yet how
much clearer are the truths of theological materialism, which is more or less placed in the worldview of
“philosophical
naturalism,”
with the difference being that
philosophical naturalism is generally irreligious, and theological
materialism is religious in seeing Godhood as the goal of material
evolution, first mirrored in the Father-Within of the ascetic
traditional religions, now transformed but not rejected by new
truths from science and philosophy, and not lies coming from Satan who was just a
symbol to aid ascetics.
Sunday, March 10, 2019
Burke and Kirk didn't emphasize enough the political significance of kin and ethnic group
Businessmen aren't
constructed to be statesman, his/her interest is in making money,
they don't spend much time with philosophy or learning statecraft.
The reason we have a businessman as President now is because we have
had such lousy politicians.
For example, both liberals
and conservative's agree that having multicultural multi-ethnic
societies is a good thing and both shout racism and bigotry if you
disagree with them or point out that human nature has been affirmed
throughout human history to this day as being mainly kin-centered and
ethnocentric, as well as being gender defined, heterosexual,
territorial, and even xenophobic, with group-selection as the primary
unit of successful selection,
followed by individual selection.
Are our politicians
stupid, cowardly, or both? Or are they just venal, on the take, and
amoral? Some of each I would say, with very few exceptions; the
courageous politicians have been labeled racist, bigoted, etc, and
destroyed by venal politicians, the amoral Big Media, Hollywood, and
our academic faculties.
So what can we do about
it? We can become the little platoons that
Burke talked about, proceeding
towards a love of our country, but more directly toward a love of kin
and ethnic group. Burke and Kirk didn't emphasize enough the political significance of kin and ethnic group. The affirmation of real
human nature instinctively and reasonable leads not to multicultural
multi-ethnic societies but toward ethnostates, and ideally an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates. That is what defines or should define the values of
real liberalism, real conservatism, and real politicians.
Saturday, March 09, 2019
Can we save ourselves from the destructive fate that the Big Media, Hollywood, the big academic faculties, and the effete, gender-less, lefty vegetarians have in store for us?
The typical trendy list contains racism, sexism, ageism,
ableism, trans- and homophobia, Islamophobia, antisemitism,
xenophobia, etc---but who then remains? A tribe of effete,
genderless, lefty vegetarians? Ah but they were strongly supported
by the Big Media, Hollywood, and the big academic faculties which had
enough power to virtually destroy Western culture and Western people.
So is it over for Western people, did the Big Media,
Hollywood, the big academic faculties, and the tribe of effete,
genderless, lefty vegetarians win? It looks that way. But these people also totally support minority groups who will at least advance. We could try
to build our own conservative version of the Big Media, Hollywood,
and academic faculties alongside their Church of Cultural Marxism
with a conservative counterrevolution, but the foundation we build
upon may need more than that.
I believe the Big Media, Hollywood, the big academic
faculties, and globalist elites have all but destroyed the chance of such a recovery
because they have created multicultural multi-ethnic cities and
states that will not bond together, they are too dissimilar to bond
together, as human nature has always prescribed.
We may be able to retain the U. S. Constitutional
separation of powers and states if we gradually and legally, not
radically, transform the powers, regions, and states into an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by federalism. Given human nature things could
go that way anyway, and not peacefully. We might this way retain what
is best of the past and save Western culture and Western people from the destructive fate that the Big Media, Hollywood,
the big academic faculties, and the effete, genderless, lefty
vegetarians have in store for us. And it has the big virtue of also saving non-western people and cultures who could at last live in their own ethnostates and make of them what they will.
Friday, March 08, 2019
If we split the difference between nature and nurture we could come up with a reasonable political philosophy
Although
there is a gene-culture co-evolution or "dual inheritance"
that takes place between nature and nurture, if we split the
difference between nature and nurture, which some think is 70% nature
and 30% nurture, we could come up with a reasonable political
philosophy.
Modern liberalism is about
100 percent on the 30% side of nurture and conservatives are on are
that 70% nature side, although both sides approve of individualism.
Liberalism wants the government to insure a collective individual
freedom, which tends to move toward socialism/communism and ends up
taking away individual freedom, while conservatism want unchecked
individual freedom, especially for capitalism (libertarianism), which
tends to create societies ruled
or controlled by people of great wealth or
income that end up taking away individual freedom.
If we look a little deeper
at what that 70% nature side is telling us about human nature, the
science of sociobiology and common sense show us that human nature
has been affirmed throughout human history to this day as being
basically kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual,
marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, territorial, and even
xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with
group-selection as the primary unit of successful
selection, followed by individual
selection.
Sociobiologist E.O. Wilson
has found that in successful survival and reproduction, "within
groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups
of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals." And
“hereditary altruists form groups so cooperative and
well-organized as to out-compete non-altruists groups.” (“The
Social Conquest of the Earth.”) Wilson doesn't emphasize
enough that altruism was developed to enhance the survival success
of kin and ethnic group, but being-for-others almost disappears beyond
the related genetic pool.
Cultures can operate for a
time with behavior that goes against this basic human nature, with
such experiments as Marxism, but cultures are eventually pulled back
by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures
that better reflect real human nature, and humans then work within
and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in.
This suggests to reason
and instinct that ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates
are the best political configuration for humans beings to live
within. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could even be
established legally in the United States with our constitutional
separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. It may
require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the
states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, but that is
far preferable to radical and marauding Marxism or Fascism, or the
political dissimulations of today based on flawed definitions of
human nature that have brought us radically destructive civil
disruptions, or even civil war, and which are now increasing across
the world within unworkable multicultural multi-ethnic societies.
Wednesday, March 06, 2019
When there is no love, compulsion is employed
As Russell Kirk said, when
there is no love, compulsion is employed. Taking that further to the
social experiments of multiculturalism and multi-ethnic states, we
see that they do not harmonize with kin and ethnic-centered human
nature---the true origin of altruism---and so compulsion is needed. But even compulsion doesn't
make them work, as we now see in America and across the world.
Why is this so hard for
even conservatives to accept? It's the brainwashing and propaganda
from the Big Media and the academic world, and also, alas, from the
universalism of even religion telling us that we are all the same. And of course political correctness punishes us acutely for disagreeing with their lies.
But ironically, or
diabolically, this myth of telling us that we are
all the same, all equal, and that we must therefore live in the same
multicultural and multi-ethnic space, is often promoted by
individuals and ethnic groups who selfishly benefit and advance from
promoting those lies in the Media they control.
So for now our little
media must battle the Big Media. Truth usually prevails, but not
always swiftly, and heroes and martyrs are usually needed.
Tuesday, March 05, 2019
I wonder if we will ever have the leisure, the money, and the time to breed and develop better quality fashions, homes, luxurious lifestyle, and leadership than the English aristocrats
I
obviously believe in change in the evolutionary philosophy of
theological materialism, but I don't think changes should be made
unless the change is actually better than the past.
I think the Anglophile's
are basically right in revering the
age of aristocracy in England regarding clothing, fashions, homes,
luxurious lifestyle, and leadership in general; it was one of the
greatest
aristocracies in history, even if it was
eventually prone to etiolation and effeteness.
In
my view, changes in fashions, homes, luxurious lifestyle, etc. would only be improvements
around the edges of the age of aristocracy in England. The English
aristocrats had the leisure, the money, and the time (1688-1830) to
develop the very best quality in fashion, homes, and luxurious
lifestyle. The fashions and homes of today are greatly inferior to
the age of aristocracy in England by any sane assessment, give or
take a few damp manor houses, stiff collars, and bustles.
Breeding between aristocrats of the British Empire was present for a long time not only relating to homes, fashions, etc, but in the greatly successful leadership of the state, armed forces, government, clergy, the big landowners, etc. Even so, in the long run I believe more in the separation of powers and states
as seen in the original U. S. Constitution, even to the extent
of developing ethnostates for distinctively different ethnic groups. I
also believe in meritocracies which prevent the etiolation and
effeteness that aristocracies are prone to. And I believe in the
constant genetic improvement of human beings all the way to Godhood.
Even
so, I wonder if we will ever have the leisure, the money, and the
time to breed and develop better quality fashions, homes, luxurious
lifestyle, and leadership than the English aristocrats of 1688-1830.
Sunday, March 03, 2019
Evolution and conservatism
Continuing evolution takes place best in
conservative environments where the best of the past can be retained
even as we continue evolving higher talent and beauty; those who
shout radical revolution, or worse, whenever human evolution is
spoken of are wrong. Genetic engineering will speed up the process of
human evolution but conserving the best of the past will remain a
principle part of our evolution.
Altruism
or being for others was evolved from
races competing with outside groups, which required altruism within
groups to be successful against other groups who may have been less
altruistic within their group. So altruistic genes survived, and
group selection remains today the central unit of selection, as
E.O.Wilson
has recently affirmed.
In
a better world attuned to real human nature, which remains kin and
ethnic centered, ethnic groups will have their own ethnostates, and
that would define deep conservatism. As the scientist
Raymond Cattell suggested, ethnic groups should be allowed their own
evolutionary development, permitting scientific conclusions regarding
traits favoring group survival and evolution.
Fox
TV conservative's proclaim a conservatism of ideas not race and
excoriate modern liberals for featuring race and gender, but Fox
conservative's fail to understand that the problem is that liberals
proclaim and champion only minority races and make whites the enemy.
If the liberals proclaimed the right of every race and ethnic group
to be who they are, even within their own ethnostates, then they would be
more deeply conservative than the Fox TV conservatives---all liberals
would have to do is include whites when they feature race, and of course stop being cultural Marxists.
Friday, March 01, 2019
That which must not be named: "whites"
We are barely allowed to
say that the left is out to "destroy our
past," we are not allowed to say the deeper truth that the left
is out to destroy whites, because the left has told us by way of the
Big Media, Big Tech, and our culturally Marxist universities that the
"white male Euro-Christian construction" must disappear.
But what really is happening is minority ethnic groups have overtaken
the minds of leftist whites, radical feminists, gender-benders, etc.,
who are oblivious to the biological origin of our social behavior,
and minority ethnic groups have made cuckolds out of all of them.
Then there are the more
despicable conscious politicians like Schumer and Pelosi who are
counting on the coming minority status of whites and the new majority
status of minorities to keep them in power, and for that reason only,
and not for moral reasons, they are sucking up to minorities, calling
for open borders, unrestricted immigration, etc.
In reaction to the anarchy
of the suicidal left and the will to power of ethnic minorities we now
have two Americas hating each other. Euro-American's have no choice
but to fight back for the survival of Western civilization and the
survival of that which must not be named: whites. Trump became
President because he tapped into this group.
But I believe we must
eventually have a lawful, gradual, conservative transformation of
the Constitutional separation of powers and states into ethnostates,
in harmony with kin and ethnic centered human nature---not fascism,
not empire building, just congenial ethnostates, and an
ethnopluralism of ethnostates, a real home that every ethnic group
or at least every gene-pool and the distinctive culture they
create need to best survive and flourish.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)