Modern liberalism or cultural Marxism, and even some versions of conservatism, are fueled by the failure to
recognize real human nature and the biological origin of social
behavior, or by purposefully blockading it.
Why the failure? It's seems to be
mainly due to the success of the agitation of grievances, the politics
of complaint or resentment developed mostly by minorities, who think
or instinctively believe that recognizing the biological origin of
social behavior will cause them to lose out to majorities if the
majorities don't so easily fall for the politics of grievances.
But thinking more long-term, minorities
could see that recognizing real human nature and the biological
origin of social behavior instinctively and logically would lead to
establishing their own ethnostate and a natural ethnopluralism of
ethnostates for all ethnic or racial groups.
Nothing could be more true and just to kin-centered and
ethnocentric human nature.
The only problem might be that the
spoils of the politics of complaint or
resentment wouldn't be there; but that is a
plus rather than a minus. Minorities (and majorities) would gain the harmony and joy
of developing their own culture based on their own genetic and
cultural traits---and in the U. S. with the constitutional separation of powers
and states they would be federally protected
from marauding imperialists.
With an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, legally and non-violently established, we have nothing important to lose but our alienation and
cultural disharmony.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment