Fighting against natural political behavior is not successful in the long term

Conservative Allan Carlson talks about how the American Midwest might have become the dominant region of the United States, but how East Coast intellectuals and television producers destroyed regionalism by successfully labeling the regions as full of rednecks, crypto anti-Semites, etc. etc. Those were the patriotic populist/nationalists of the Midwest and the South who elected Trump.

It won't be easy but America could still be saved if the Midwest and the South can continue to stand against the East and West Coast intellectuals and the corrupt Big Media they control. Trump hasn't been helping the cause with the petty almost unhinged battles he wastes his time on. But he's all we have, for now.

Can the American Midwest become the dominant region of the United States? Ultimately I think regionalism in general in the U.S. can best be advanced by gradually transforming all the regions into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in line with our already existing constitutional separation of powers and states. (There might even be a region for decadent multicultural liberals?) 

Why? Because people always create cultures that biologically and ethnically reflect what they are, which includes Regional Patriots as well as the East and West Coast cabal.  Fighting against that natural political behavior is not successful in the long term.

Eurogenes Blog: The ancient genomics revolution (Skoglund & Mathie...

Eurogenes Blog: The ancient genomics revolution (Skoglund & Mathie...: Two former Harvard scientists Pontus Skoglund and Iain Mathieson are working on a new review paper on the wide range of scientific breakthro...

Defending the survival of the gene pool that developed the British Empire

When I unwisely venture to criticize Idiot Prince Harry's rejection of his own upper class British gene pool with his decision to marry a beautiful black American woman, I am not hatefully attacking the gene pool of black Americans, or defining gene pools as inferior or superior. I am an admiring American defending the survival of the gene pool that developed the British Empire, which was perhaps the greatest empire in human history (although I now reject the building of empires)

Resembling George Orwell's brilliant predictive terms "newspeak" and "thoughtcrime," the cultural criminals---yes criminals---of today have successfully perverted the love of ones own people, ones own ethnic culture, into terms of evil, such as white supremacy, racism, hate, and deplorables.  The biological and genetic origin of most of our social behavior has become unmentionable.

The British royals have become a symbol for the destruction of a great nation, from goofy Prince Charles, who shattered and destroyed his beautiful young wife because he missed the mothering of his old girlfriend, and now his idiot son Prince Harry.

A dead white male British genius once wrote: "Lord, what fools these mortals be!"

Overcoming the disorder and chaos of multiculturalism

To paraphrase Alexander Zubatov (Chronicles, Dec. 2017), multicultural messages coming in from all over the numerous media, unconnected to any central reality, create "societal schizophrenia," which brings society to a crisis so it cannot function.

For me this points to the idea that in multicultural societies social order naturally falls apart because distinctly different ethnic groups do not or cannot easily assimilate and therefore compete against one another and even become enemies. This is the reality of real human nature, which remains kin-centered and ethnocentric.

And to complicate multiculturalism even further, it is usually promoted by people who exploit the disorder and chaos to advance their own group.

Is there a way out the disorder and chaos of multiculturalism? Religious, political, or ethnic totalitarianism, fascism, or empire-building have often been the temptation, but these always fall apart for many of the same reasons that multiculturalism falls apart: distinctly different ethnic groups and states do not or cannot easily assimilate, even with force, and the empires fall.

I think the best way out of the increasing disorder and chaos of multiculturalism is to affirm distinctly different non-assimilating ethnic cultures by developing an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. The constitutional separation of powers and states in the U.S. could lend itself to this natural solution. The big question is can this be done consciously and rationally, or will we have to completely fall apart first?

The way real charitable empathy can exist across the world

Catholics are more practical than Protestants in giving two pillars to the church, scripture plus ongoing apostolic tradition, but protestants are closer to the complete non-material, ascetic, impracticality of Christ in validating only the scriptures.

So if we consider what Chilton Williamson Jr. called "universal empathy" (Chronicles Dec. 2017) and how the Church teaches us that our primary charitable empathy is to those nearest to us, that practicality leans more toward apostolic tradition and interpretation than the scriptures.

We can, and should, care about the world, at least at the far end of our charitable empathy, but our genetically derived human nature simply cares more deeply about kin and ethnic group. This may not conform to the ideals of socialism, postmodernism, or even the Church, but it is nevertheless true.

Such things as universal empathy, the Brotherhood of Man, universal equality, and perfect liberty, which have been promoted for many years by liberalism, do not exist in reality. And fascism tends to want only one group in the world, which is not only impractical but almost as unreal as promoting  universal empathy (really brain-washing).

The reality which forms around the real charity and real empathy inherent in human nature suggests an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, protected by populist nationalism---that is the practical way real charitable empathy can exist across the world.

What's with these people still wanting to build corrupt empires?

It looks like a build up to war with Iran, pushed by the usual influence dealers in Washington, the Wall Street lobby, "neoconservatives," and the Israeli and Saudi lobbyists, who pay off and threaten corrupt government officials and representatives to get them to take actions that are completely against the interests of our nation.

It is basically America/Israel against Russia/Iran, with China sitting back watching the fools, but leaning toward Russia. President Trump seems to be falling for war with Iran even though he was elected by people who do not want these wars.

Russia wants to build another empire, not having learned from the collapse of their Soviet empire. And China of course is on its way to building the next big empire. America could lose this one and then lose its corrupt empire, like its British cousin lost their last global empire. What's with these people still wanting to build corrupt empires?

If they really wanted to, all of these people could develop an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in their home territories, protected by populist/nationalism. In the U.S.A. the constitutional separation of powers and states could be gradually adapted toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. which is directly harmonious with real kin-centered, gender defined, heterosexual, hierarchical, ethnocentric, and even xenophobic human nature.

This will come, it's in the historical wind, the question is when?

Truth, beauty, change, and essence

Can we say truth is about what does not change? There's a problem with that. Things always change and evolve. So perfect objectivity seems dubious. Real truth includes change. Even when Godhood is attained in material evolution, life moves on and evolves to higher Godhood, endlessly it seems.

"Beauty" works the same way. Rather than say that beauty is the most characteristic of the species, it might be better to say that beauty is the synthesis of the particular species at various levels of evolution. Godhood could then be seen as the most perfect syntheses of life itself at the highest stages of evolution at any given stage of evolution.

Only humans think in terms of beginnings and endings because we see ourselves ending and beginning, at least as individuals.

So then we come to the "essence " of life which seems to be the activation to life within life, called many things, the will, the spirit, the soul, the spirit-will, or Tirips as I have come to call it, which is entirely material and works along with the outside material natural world in which life evolves. Yet even this essence has the changing goal of activating life toward Godhood, endlessly.

I'm not defending Roy Moore, but how is early marriage worse than what we have?

Well, hillbilly Roy Moore has taken Harvey Weinstein and the degenerate Hollywood cabal out of the Big Media picture. How convenient. The Big Media and Hollywood have always hated the south because the south (rightly) hates the Big Media. I'm not defending Roy Moore, whose southern brand of Christianity probably caused more people to reject religion than science ever did. But how is early marriage worse than what we have?  What has our stopping girls from marrying in their teens really done for girls in the West? Liberals now smugly pass out condoms to teen girls in schools and teach disastrous cultural Marxism. Teen culture in the West has become a degenerate and decadent separate culture of sex, drugs and rock and roll.

If we want to prevent the destruction of America we have to fix our historical immigration mistakes

In the past 50 years we have had 50 million immigrants, legally and illegally, and the main problem with immigration has been that the old "melting pot" no longer melts---it was originally workable with mainly European immigrants who could more naturally harmonize and assimilate with the existing Euro-American citizens of America, and the new immigrants were no longer Europeans and would not or could not assimilate.

This is only natural given that real human nature is kin-centered, gender defined, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other traditional traits. Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against real human nature with such unworkable immigration experiments as we have had, but cultures are eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature.

So since the melting pot idea no longer melted we changed to the "multicultural" mosaic idea, which has caused not order but separation and bitter stratification and competition between distinctly different ethnic groups---which makes complete sense given the real human nature just mentioned.

Now if we want to prevent the destruction of America we have to fix our historical immigration mistakes. We will need to legally develop an ethnopluralism of ethnostates from out of our constitutional separation of powers and states. It won't be easy of course because even mentioning this common sense solution goes against the prevailing political correctness of cultural Marxism which has both purposely and ignorantly usurped and nearly destroyed American culture.

Why beauty will never be permanently usurped by ugliness

In one of his amusing and gutsy columns Taki Theodoracopulos mentioned the ancient Greek belief that an ugly countenance comes from within and portrays an ugly soul. That also makes sense when we consider less romantic genetics: sexual selection often chooses beauty because beauty indicates a healthier reproductive partner.

Money can displace beauty, and even buy beauty, but if beauty and and health are hijacked for money the reproductive product may be damaged down the line. Instinctively healthy young people often still get into trouble with their older more venal advisers because they tend to choose beauty over everything else.

And in spite of the radical feminists and cultural Marxists who are trying to promote ugly people, advertisers, movie producers and beauty contests still, usually, prefer beauty because it sells better than ugliness.

But the Greeks, radical feminists, and cultural Marxists took beauty down the wrong metaphysical path when they made absolute beauty a nonphysical, non-material thing. And they did the same spiritualization to truth and goodness. Traditional religions did the same thing, and soon real physical beauty took second and third place to mere ideas, at least with philosophers and theologians.

We evolve to Godhood in the material and supermaterial world, and Godhood is the zenith of beautiful, living, material/supermaterial objects.  So beauty, truth and goodness will never be permanently usurped by ugliness.

Let each musical form and each people develop on their own

I'm reluctant to compare European classical music and American jazz because they really do come from different ethnic cultures and it's like comparing apples and oranges. Multiculturalism forces distinctly different cultures together, which naturally brings competition, along with deep resentments, etc., because human nature remains kin-centered and ethnocentric.

I've never understood why some jazz musician didn't follow what Miles Davis did and play fewer notes when improvising rather than more notes. Think of the difference between the improvisations of Miles and Coltrane. And speaking of Coltrane, although Coltrane was soulful and religious I usually found his notes more angry than melodic. I like Cannonball Adderley better because of his very melodic way of improvising.

Where Miles went wrong, which had later repercussions throughout the jazz world, was in "making it new" his God. Here the conservative philosophy would have helped, and Miles certainly was not a conservative. The popular album "Kind of Blue" was never surpassed by Miles (or anyone else) and Miles should not have sacrificed that form. That album brings jazz into its own as a great form distinctly different from European classical music. But instead, jazz followed Miles into new forms inferior to old forms, and Miles seems to have sunk into complete hedonism.

Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, and Chopin could improvise like crazy, and on very complicated themes, but there were no recording devices around to capture it. We could think of their variations on themes as improvisations corrected and perfected as they were written down. But there is something very ballsy and exciting about jazz musicians improvising on the spot, although they do improvise on the same songs night after night. That creation-on-the spot is the uniqueness of the jazz experience.

But that sort of selflessness in jazz playing is almost ruined by the defensiveness of jazz musicians and critics, which is inevitable in multicultural societies. I'm reminded of Paul Fussell's comment on the sports "experts" in bars defensively talking statistics and trumpeting their importance like stock brokers,

Let each musical form and each people develop on their own.

Ways America could be saved

There are two main ways America could be saved: the hard way would be for the empire first to fall as a result of our global military and economic meddling, and the better way of disengaging from global military and economic meddling. That is, disengaging from the Korean peninsula, the nefarious behavior of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran. etc., because engaging with them has hurt us far more than helped us.

But disengagement means our Senators and Representatives would have to go along with it, and most of them are controlled by lobbies of the very same people we need to disengage from, which is why we never have the simple way out of our imperial mess---meddling purposely creates deceitful complications.

"America First " means we deal with the world to enhance the American people and not merely to enhance the thoroughly corrupt globalists. Nationalism in military and economic affair doesn't create isolationism, as we are told by those who benefit from globalist meddling.

I think the conservative thing to do is to work on three fronts: first, we work toward disengagement from the Korean peninsula, the nefarious behavior of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran. etc, second, we prepare to pick up the pieces when the empire falls. And finally we prepare for our own devolutionary disengagement from Big Government by gradually transforming our constitutional separation of powers and states into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with real human nature, protected by military and economic nationalism.

A note on connecting evolution, dialectics, conservatism and theology

Hegel and the communists don't own the dialectics. Material evolution is the deepest dialectics, and conservatism can maintain the past as it moves toward the future. Biological evolution moves through the thesis, antithesis and synthesis but then on toward another thesis.

The ultimate synthesis is Godhood evolved to in the material and supermaterial world, but then even Godhood evolves on to the next level of Godhood. It is human beings, who are mortal, who provincially insist on beginnings and endings. But there is no end or beginning to evolution, dialectics, conservatism or theology.

It's a meritocracy, no matter what gender you are

"A woman came into our conference room yesterday and she saw five men sitting there waiting for her. She said, joking, but not really joking, "I see no women in here at all. Why is that?"

Everyone looked around, saying nothing. Then I said, "This place runs strictly on merit, it's a meritocracy, no matter what gender you are."

"Are you sure?" She asked me.

"Why would I lie about that, we're proud of it," I replied.

She stared at me for a few seconds, then she sat down and said, "Can we get started?" The meeting began, and it went fine. And we bought here product because it was superior."

Earl B.

I wouldn't be surprised to see a third party win in the next presidential election

Does globalism always win? Trump's "draining of the swamp" excited both the populist left and right, but the Republican and Democratic parties don't really believe in populism, they and their friends in the Big Media, the academic world, and global corporations, are draining Trump instead of the swamp.

Even though third parties usually lose in America, there is a new deeper survival force in modern politics; I wouldn't be surprised to see a third party win in the next presidential election. The third party will be resolutely populist nationalist, and economic nationalist.

I suppose we will have to wait awhile for the deepest political vehicle, that is, gradually and legally transforming the constitutional separation of powers and states into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with real human nature. Globalism will criminally fight this as they always have. But empires always fall, and ethnostates always rise.

People develop culture before culture develops people

I don't think Hellaire Belloc lacked courage but he got his priorities wrong with his statement "The Faith is Europe and Europe is the Faith." Europe is Europeans, it was ethnic Europeans who developed the faith and culture of Europe.

Conservatives make the same mistake, but in their case it often has to do with the consequences they suffer from saying anything that is considered politically incorrect. They will defend the faith but not the people, the ethnic group, who developed the faith.

It's not easy to speak of the biological or genetic origin of most of our social behavior, it's even against the law in Europe, more or less, but that doesn't change the truth, and it won't save Europeans or Euro-Americans.

The political correctness of cultural Marxism was itself mainly the product of a group of ethnic Jewish philosophers who fled Germany in the 1930s, the so-called "Frankfurt School," so the sociobiological priority of people developing culture before culture develops people is affirmed.

This is not anti any group, it defines the kin-centered and ethnic-centered development of human cultures from human nature.

The best way to overcome depression and anger over the decline of the West

It's easy for deep conservatives to become depressed or angry about the decline of the West when all their culture shows them is endless commercials with American families attempting to rap dance with joy over a new consumer product.

And Christianity tends to offer only sentimental slop about us all getting along, which no one listens to. Conservatives never mention sociobiology as a great aid in the recovery of the West.

The deepest affirmation of conservative behavior comes from the biological and genetic origin of much of our social behavior which remains today as it has been, kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

There is opportunity for conservatives even in our decline to recover---without radicalism---by gradually transforming the constitutional separation of powers and states into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, in harmony with real human nature. That is the best way I know of to overcome depression and anger over the decline of the West.

How and why leftist and vulgar Show Business and Hollywood conquered

Childish narcissistic actors were only pawns in the leftist and vulgar take down of traditional America, which was accomplished even though the majority of Americans didn't approve of the leftism and vulgarity.

Was it the refusal of America to allow the mostly Jewish immigrants or sons of immigrants who developed Hollywood and Show Business to assimilate, or was it their own refusal to assimilate which caused them to promote the leftism and vulgarity which has been destroying traditional America?

Then the academic world was a great aid to Show Business and Hollywood by teaching our students to accept cultural Marxism, transgenderism, codes of speech, racial and gender quotas, safe spaces, march-riots, etc. etc.

Ironically, piggy producer Harvey Weinstein's fall from grace had more to do with the actions of radical feminism, promoted by Show Business and Hollywood, than it did from anything else...What a world.

Even if poetry could go back to traditional rhythm, sound, and image it could still be boring

There are very few great poets, just as there are very few great philosophers, so even if poetry could go back to traditional rhythm, sound, and image it could still be boring. Like the abstractions of modern philosophers which lead nowhere, the images of modern poets also usually go nowhere.

The Beat poets felt the need to bring poetry back to the reality of the physical sexual world, they rejected traditional poetry for more reasons than hating capitalism or fidelity in marriage, they rejected traditional poetry because it was boring. The leftism and hedonism of the Beat poets, and later their Buddhism, was decadent and degenerate, but they were right about most traditional poetry being boring.

What is missing in both modern poetry and philosophy is the reality of the biological origin of most of our social behavior, including the social behavior of making poetry or philosophy. That is, the reality of being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection. When poetry or philosophy includes the blood and guts of those truths it is harder to be boring.

Deepening our constitutional separation of powers and states

I believe that Americans should go back and pick up the good things that the Founder's taught us. Our hope is to fall back upon our Constitution and the traditional American way of life. It is the only political foundation we have and it will still work in this populated world, by insisting on local and state government, and a small federal government, but with a few constitutional amendments.

It is necessary to work in harmony with real human nature which has been affirmed throughout human history to this day as being kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. Cultures can operate for a time with behavior that goes against this human nature, with such experiments as Marxism, but culture is eventually pulled back by the biological and genetic leash of real human nature to cultures that better reflect real human nature, and humans must then work within and adapt to the environments they find themselves living in.

This shows anyone who is willing to look at reality that an ethnopluralism of ethnostates is probably the best political configuration for humans beings to live within. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates or regions could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, protected by federalism. It may require a few constitutional amendments to give more power to the states to move toward an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. It will, of course, not be easy at all, but it is far preferable to radical Marxism or Fascism, or political dissimulations based on flawed definitions of human nature, which increasingly bring us civil disruptions, or even civil war, now increasing across the world within unworkable multicultural (multi-ethnic) societies.