Liberalism is irrational, populism is rational

Contrary to prevailing opinion today liberalism is irrational, populism is rational. Liberal's typically look down their noses at Trumpians thinking them complete irrational idiots, when the truth is it is the liberals who are the irrational idiots in promoting postmodernism, Marxism, feminism, multiculturalism, which are mainly irrational absurdities, lies, and undisguised wills to power---and these things are astoundingly taught in virtually all our schools and reflected throughout the media.

The postmodern idea that everything is socially constructed (but not postmodernism?) is almost psychotic. The explanation for the freakish victory of postmodernism, Marxism, feminism, etc. in the academic world and in the media is that the relativism and power philosophy of postmodernism was not successfully countered by the academic traditional conservatives because they could not fully accept their best defense, which is the broadly biological origin of our social behavior, taught by the scientific synthesis of sociobiology. They could not even affirm religion as essentially having been a better way to socially bond groups together (altruism) for successful survival and reproduction. And so postmodernism won the academic power war.

The biological origin of our social behavior, as empirically explained by sociobiology, actually ends the intellectual defense of postmodern relativism. As long as we are alive every cell in our body demands survival and reproductive success. This natural activation can be blocked, subverted, or it can be unknown to us, but it can't legitimately be intellectually or instinctively denied. Human nature is biologically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection followed by individual selection.. The populists have rationally championed kin, related ethnic group, locality and nation, the liberals have irrationally not.

We may lament more than the loss of watching sports

 On his Fox show ”Unfiltered,” like many of us, Dan Bongino was lamenting the loss of watching sports before the Back Lives Matter movement ruined the collective joy in watching ones team win a big game, with their disrespectful displays on the field, rejecting our patriotic symbols, calling them racists etc. Then Bongino ended by saying sadly that he wants that magical time back again. I shook my head and said to the TV:  "We wont get it back, Dan, until we create ethnostates.”

When human behavior is seen from the realistic biological origin of social behavior all races are “systemically racist." The Black Lives Matter movement, which has been loudly accusing all whites of being racist, is driven by the very same black racism, and we are not going to solve any racial problems until we admit this. Human nature has always been naturally genetically kin and ethnic centered. When real human nature is allowed to be what it is, often leads to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, and eventually ethnostates, which then can offer the most peace and liberty possible, given real human nature.

But even conservatives as courageous and patriotic as Bongino don't see it yet, and until they do they will go on lamenting not only the loss of the collective joy in watching sports, they may soon lament the loss of their whole culture. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, and protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc.

The realistic way to solve Martin Buber's “I-Thou and I-It'” way of looking at the world

The realistic way to solve Martin Buber's “I-Thou and I-It'” way of looking at the world is not to define the I-Thou as identifying with a spiritual God ruling all people and demanding that we religiously call each other “Thou” rather than “It,” but rather to acknowledge and and affirm that the biological origin of social behavior favors the survival of the I-It attitude with all ethnic groups and races, because all groups biologically seek survival and reproductive success for themselves first; we can then redefine the I Thou as respecting the right of each ethnic group to seek survival and reproductive success living separately in ethnostates with ethnopluralism.

The religious justification for an ethnopluralism of ethnostates need not reach down to spiritualism but up to the process of the material evolution of life toward Godhood, activated from within every cell of living bodies, which then react and adapt to the various outside environments that life lives in. This activation is the same activation that leads to the desire to successfully survive and reproduce. The goal of evolving to Godhood need not deprive us of either politics, science, or religion. When Godhood is seen as a naturalistic and theological goal, the goal of evolution, then biology and theology need not settle for the empty spiritualism. Nature and philosophy can be seen as life materially evolving toward ascending levels of Godhood. We can realistically define the I Thou as best realized by respecting the right of each I-It ethnic group to seek survival and reproductive success and their evolution toward Godhood living in ethnostates with ethnopluralism, and with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, chosenites, Marxists, etc., with a defensive federalism.

Defending an always evolving aristocracy (from the archive)

 It is usually not said that aristocracy does not depend on wealth or civilized taste alone but also on genetic qualities. Good genetic qualities lead to intelligence etc. which in turn can lead to a financial aristocracy, but then education and civilization are required to make a real aristocracy.

Although I am more or less a populist on the right believing in localism, and the separation of powers, states, and people, I can't be against the inequality of wealth, the level of civilization, or genetic qualities, I am not a socialist or Marxist. But the genetic lag between people and cultures, which is one of the main causes of problems between people and cultures, can in fact be addressed with humane genetic and eugenic actions for all who desire it.

But the goal is not merely to develop a wealthy and civilized human evolving aristocracy, but to continue evolving on earth and out into the cosmos toward Godhood, which is defined as the highest material and supermaterial aristocracy, the highest beauty, truth, goodness, consciousness and intelligence. This evolution toward Godhood defines the sacred goal of life.

As to “heroes of the mind,” they need to be linked to the evolution of life, human life, and to the evolution of higher species on the path to Godhood. That is the first supposition of human history and the most worthy goal of religion, philosophy, art and politics. It all starts from this natural basis. Compare this goal to the consciousness, thoughts, and conceptions of modern intellectuals.

As I have suggested here before regarding high art, we drifted away from didactic and moral art as we became more literate, but as evolutionary psychologists have pointed out, story-telling had survival benefits in the Pleistocene, and it still does, when we relate beauty to real biological life, evolution, and religion. There is no need to use a hammer to didactically or morally inspire in art, past aristocracies have shown us that art is usually best when it is subtle. The idea of Godhood attained in future evolution has sacred artistic and religious value, but it also has survival and reproductive value. And great art has always affirmed the sacred.

We can have, and we need, both science and religion

The primal world (energy or will) belongs to both the physicist and the theologian. Naturalism can be enlarged to theological materialism. Life and the world is evolving toward Godhood. Evolution never ends, it moves inevitably in a pattern---even though it has its random elements---and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat---toward higher and higher more effective living forms, always evolving toward ascending levels of Godhood. We can have biological idealism grounded in naturalism, we can have, and we need, both science and religion. We need more than postmodernism in the academic world, hedonism promoted by the Big Media, modern liberalism on the left, libertarianism on the right, or totalitarian Marxism.

What kind of order defines the most human order and peace possible in the long term?

“Order must be preserved at any rate or at any price. Peace is the great End in all Governments. Liberty is the End only in the Best.” said Edmund Burke.

But what kind of order defines the most human order and peace possible in the long term? Much depends on how we define human nature, which in turn defines the order and peace possible in the long term. If for example your aim is to create an orderly communist society where everyone is equal in all things you will have to you use force, which eventually leads to social rebellion, because human nature has always been naturally genetically kin and ethnic centered. When real human nature is allowed to be what it is, it more often leads to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, and eventually ethnostates, which then can offer the most peace and liberty possible given real human nature. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states, and protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc,

Spirit is Matter

Matter was Spirit to Teilhard de Chardin. He believed he had resolved a core conflict of the split between Matter and Spirit, between Body and Soul. He believed he understood that the evolution of matter was one and the same with the evolution of spirit (consciousness).

"The Way Teilhard Saw It

               Spirit did not by the touch of the divine
               call lowly Matter to life,
               rather Matter was Spirit
                     from the absolute beginning
               latent with unimaginable power
               in the embryo of a cosmic mustard seed
               dreaming of bursting into flower!
                     -- Charles C. Finn, August 10, 2021”

Theological materialism sees it the opposite way: spirit is matter, there is no spirit. Spirit and matter are of one essence and not dualistic, just as energy can “freeze” into matter, and matter can unfreeze into energy. It's not really accurate to say that matter is the inferior aspect of spirit and spirit the superior aspect of matter, spirit is really super-materiality and not something apart from matter. This means you really can't define spirit and matter as good and evil, but you can define matter as evolved and unevolved. Evolution is the activation of the will to life within matter to evolve to Godhood, working along with outside evolution and national selection. Godhood is ascending levels of super-materiality.

History as the narrative of progress

A big philosophical and religious divide today is between those who see history as the narrative of progress (Hegel, Cattell? Wilber?) and those say the world lacks teleological design and purpose in the material world ( Schopenhauer, early Nietzsche, Postmodernism, Science?).

The hopeless relativity of values that is promoted by modern philosophy is untrue and unreal. There exists a biological teleology, a design and purpose in the material world, flowing through all life, which offers freedom but within a determined biological teleology.

I ask why does “life” “live?” Why is life animate rather than inanimate? Why does life have metabolism, growth, reproduction? Why doesn’t life just sit there doing nothing? Why has life persisted time and again in evolving from the simple to the complex under the most extreme conditions?

It is more than an outward action or reaction, there is an inward vitalism working within and shaped by outside evolution. This is the activation of the will to life, and when it is amplified it is seen as the will-to-evolve-toward-Godhood. I think it was Cattell who said evolution moves inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward higher and higher more effective living forms.

This process of evolution is activated from within every cell of living bodies, which then react and adapt to the various outside environments that life lives in. This activation is the same activation that leads to the desire to successfully survive and reproduce. And this activation is a material/supermaterial activation, but not spiritual.

The goal of evolving to Godhood need not deprive us of either science or religion. When Godhood is seen as a naturalistic and theological goal, the goal of evolution, then biology and theology need not settle for empty spiritualism. Nature and philosophy can be seen as life materially evolving toward ascending levels of Godhood.

The fall of Afghanistan to the uber-territorial warrior Taliban at the hands of the nurturing girly men of the Biden administration

 The Biden administration is stuffed with super angry, leftist feminists, like Biden advisor Susan Rice, who probably scares the hell out of weak-minded Biden himself, as well as dominating the girly men of the Biden administration, like Antony Blinken, our 71st United States secretary of state.

This is what happens to empires that are infected with leftists gender politics and with social behavior that does not correspond to real human nature, which is is genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, as well as being biologically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection followed by individual selection.

The fall of Afghanistan to the uber-territorial warrior Taliban at the hands of the nurturing girly men of the Biden administration encapsulates in miniature the features of the fall of empires.

The best way to avoid human stagnation and immobility

Ethnocentric ethnostates are the default political position, or the selection made usually automatically or without active consideration, due to real human nature, which and has always been genetically kin and ethnic centered. Aristocracy is also society’s default position, as F. H. Buckley wrote about (“For a Politics of Mobility” Modern Age, Summer 2020). “...it is mobility that’s unnatural, a brief interlude in a long history...Charles Murray attributes the rise of aristocracy to the move to an information economy in which premium wages are paid to high-IQ workers. Intelligence is largely heritable... Capitalism tends inexorably toward immobility, he argued, because of capital’s tendency to grow more quickly than the economy as a whole. To those who have, more is given; and great fortunes accumulate over time.”

I believe ethnostates and meritocracies are the best way to deal with these default political positions to avoid human stagnation and immobility. Evolutionary conservatism believes that if real kin and ethnic-centered human nature was allowed to be what it is, it would naturally lead to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, eventually ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

As to aristocracies, ascetics and others put up a Great Spiritual Blockade against the evolving material world, which actually blocks the real path to Godhood of material evolution. The natural world has to be unblocked if we are to reach ascending levels of Godhood by way of material evolution.

Theological materialism defines human evolution toward Godhood as aesthetically evolving toward the beautiful, religiously the good, and philosophically and scientifically the true

The synthesis of theological materialism defines human evolution toward Godhood as aesthetically evolving toward the beautiful, religiously the good, and philosophically and scientifically the true.

Nature can be defined as divine, not demonic, without the fiction of spirituality when we can see that nature only looks like an endless war of all against all for success in survival and reproduction and nothing more, until we affirm that we are also aided in evolution by an inward, purely physical activation to materially evolve toward ascending levels of life all the way to Godhood, which works along with the shaping of outside evolution and selection. “Evolution moves inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward higher and higher more effective living forms.” (Cattell)

Materially evolving toward ascending levels of Godhood is how we can define nature as divine not demonic and how we can see beyond the idea of morality in nature having no other demonstrable ultimate function than, as Edward O. Wilson put it, being a circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact. We are materially evolving toward Gods and we should help it along the way. Qualities such as intelligence, emotional stability, conscience (altruism), good health, good sensory organs, longevity, these are some of the aims of eugenics, and these things reach their highest quality, or their zenith, as evolution moves toward Godhood, which is aesthetically the beautiful, religiously the good, and philosophically and scientifically the true.

All races are “systemically racist”

All races are “systemically racist” when human behavior is seen from the realistic biological origin of social behavior. The Black Lives Matter movement which has been loudly accusing all whites of being racist is driven by the very same systemic black racism, and we are not going to solve any racial problems until we admit this.

The biological origin of social behavior which was introduced with Darwin and later sociobiology showed us that real human nature is and has always been genetically kin and ethnic centered (ie. racist and ethnocentric) with group selection or ethnic selection as the main unit of successful survival and reproduction, followed by individual selection. America has not successfully united different races and ethnic groups, we are naturally fragmenting into a nation of competing races in a zero game where the gains of one ethnic group is offset by the losses of another ethnic group, with much cruel social discord in the process. But all is not lost.

As one historian put it, what formerly divided us can put us back together again. It would be far more realistic to talk of un-assimilating differences rather than about superiority/inferiority. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established, legally, in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

Western political philosophy has wrongly placed the individual as the most basic metaphysical and political unit

Western political philosophy has wrongly placed the individual as the most basic metaphysical and political unit, and now its coming back to bite us. The neo-Darwinist science of sociobiology was not around when the great political philosophers did their thinking.

Here are some quotes from sociobiologists:

"Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals." (David Sloan Wilson)

“Hereditary altruists form groups so cooperative and well-organized as to out-compete non-altruists groups.” (E.O. Wilson “The Social Conquest of the Earth.”)

"The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool. The brain is a product of evolution. Human behavior . .is the circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact. " Edward O. Wilson

---

As I repeat here often: Human nature evolved to prefer kin and ethnic group because those traits were more successful in survival and reproduction for individuals and groups. Even altruism, being for others, was created as the preference for kin and ethnic group; altruism weakens as we move out toward universalism, which is the main reason why communism, socialism, and globalism don't work well.

Evolutionary conservatism adds to and deepens basic paleoconservatism by affirming the biological origin of social behavior as defined mainly by the science of sociobiology. Human nature is biologically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection followed by individual selection. Alas, like the liberals and neoconservatives even the paleoconservatives block or conceal the ethnic-centered and xenophobic parts of human nature.

Evolutionary conservatism believes that if real kin and ethnic-centered human nature was allowed to be what it is, it would naturally lead to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, eventually ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

Conservatism without biology is the doom of today's conservatism

Conservatism without biology is the doom of today's conservatism, as seen in Ross Douthat book “The Decadent Society: How We Became Victims of Our Own Success.” Douthat's answer to the decadence which has taken over the West is to suggest “a potentially flourishing Christian African continent migrating north to the older seat of Christendom, reminiscent of Evelyn Waugh’s short story “Out of Depth,” in which a future dystopian England is served and saved by African missionaries.” (John M. DeJak, Chronicles, Aug 2020)

Conservatism without biology seems to have been caused by a combination of intellectual and moral cowardliness more than by ignorance; even mentioning the biological origin of social behavior in today's decadent “woke” world means almost certain professorial and social death. But in ignoring the biological origin of social behavior the West is dying and that is more important than the plight of any individual.

Human nature evolved to prefer kin and ethnic group because those traits were more successful in survival and reproduction for individuals and groups. Even altruism, being for others, was created as the preference for kin and ethnic group; altruism weakens as we move out toward universalism, which is the main reason why communism, socialism, and globalism don't work well and tend to use force to impose an unnatural universal altruism.

Evolutionary conservatism adds to and deepens basic paleoconservatism by affirming the biological origin of social behavior as defined mainly by the science of sociobiology. Human nature is biologically kin-centered and ethnic-centered, even xenophobic, as well as being genetically gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, and religious-making, with group-selection and ethnic selection as the primary unit of successful selection. Alas, like the liberals and neoconservatives even the paleoconservatives block or conceal the ethnic-centered and xenophobic parts of human nature due it seems to universalist religious edicts.

Evolutionary conservatism believes that if real kin and ethnic-centered human nature was allowed to be what it is, it would naturally lead to regionalism, localism, general conservative values, eventually ethnostates, and finally an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc., and defended by a defensive federalism. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established legally in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states. Will we ever do it? Can we do it?

How nature can be defined as divine not demonic without the fiction of spirituality

Nature can be defined as divine not demonic without fiction of spirituality when we can see that nature only looks like an endless war of all against all for success in survival and reproduction and nothing more until we affirm that we are also aided in evolution by an inward, purely physical activation to materially evolve toward ascending levels of Godhood, which works along with the shaping of outside evolution and selection. “Evolution moves inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward higher and higher more effective living forms.” (Cattell) Materially evolving toward ascending levels of Godhood is how we can define nature as divine not demonic and how we can see beyond the idea of morality in nature having no other demonstrable ultimate function than, as Edward O. Wilson put it, being a circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact. We are materially evolving toward Gods and we should help it along the way.

Naturalistic biological determinism with theological materialism

I think in terms of a realistic or naturalistic biological determinism, which leads not to a bias of idealism but calls the human brain a survival organ that sees the world in terms of survival and reproductive success. This is not a Kantian bias it is the real world as it is. I see a natural will to survival and reproduction success of the genes also aided in evolution by an inward, purely physical activation to materially evolve toward ascending levels of Godhood. This is not a “transcendental” idealism but a natural evolutionary upward evolutionary drive working along with natural selection and evolution. We lack a total worldview that seamlessly includes both science and religion when all our social schemes are driven by this biological origin of social behavior, and the universe really is a mechanism for evolving Gods, which we should consciously get in step with since we are already unconsciously driven by it. Art and politics follow with evolutionary realism and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates, and with theological materialism in religious philosophy.

Metaphysics is nonsense

Metaphysics is nonsense in all the meanings of that word: foolish, not logical or reasonable, and literally not of the senses. It is impossible to have knowledge not of one material sense or another, even the vaunted "intellectual intuition," which mystics claim brings truths from beyond the world of the senses, is nonsense in all the meanings of that word. Abstract theory with no basis in reality is a game we can play but the material object is all when defining reality, and even when defining supermaterial Godhood.

As I have written here before: Nonexistent spiritual definitions have been given far too much attention and power in religion and philosophy, which has led to misdefining and degrading the real world. Ascetics even put up a Great Spiritual Blockade against the material world, which actually blocks the real path to Godhood of material evolution. When people like Paul Tillich or Heidegger say such things as, “God is being-itself, not being,” they perpetuate the same belief in nothing but a mode of thinking.

Spiritual definitions need to drop back to their support role or defining role and they need to cease to be Gods themselves. The natural world has to be unblocked if we are to reach real Godhood by way of evolution. The confusing name-games for God will stop when Godhood is seen as existing in the same sense and the same world that everything else exists in. The exoteric needs to rise again over the esoteric in religious theology, and does so with theological materialism where Godhood is seen as a supermaterial object evolved to in the material world.

But The Twofold Path can make room for the traditional, non-object-idea-only definitions of the God-Within, or even the bliss feelings of the Father-Within of the Inward Path of the great religions---this is included but transformed in the Outward Path of the theological materialism of the projected Theoevolutionary Church. This brings the real world into religion and religion into the real world, and most importantly it unblocks the long-blocked natural path to evolving to real Godhood, the real purpose of existence, which is only reflected in the God-Within. This means a transvaluation of Plato's and I dare say Heidegger's world, long overdue.

Religion and science need an evolutionary tune up followed by politics

It has been said that politics is down stream from culture, and culture is down stream from religion. But religion has been slowly dying since the the 17th and 18th century Enlightenment, and it's demise has been speeding up since then. Science has not filled the gap although for many in the West it has tried to take the place of religion. Both religion and science need a tune up where they can take things from each other.

As I wrote here back in 2013: “The transfiguring goal for Friedrich Nietzsche in his early writings was the creation of great men, a republic of genius. Although that is very important it is not nearly enough. Renewal requires the religious goal of our evolution to Godhood in the cosmos, which brings a far more exalted renewal of consciousness, and contains the power to revive religion, philosophy and art in the enlarged modern world.

It is not tragic music, as Nietzsche and Schopenhauer thought, which expresses “the immediate language of the will,” it is evolution. It is not the Will To Power but the Will To Godhood that activates life, which evolution then shapes, that is the real source for a renewal of mythopoetic power. Evolution is the super-epic for art, glorifying the struggle to attain Godhood. Art can bring religion to life but it is not religion.

Religion and philosophy can recognize evolutionary religion as what we need, politics can help create it, and art and religious rituals can affirm it. Our evolution can even be democratic, with a federal system respecting and protecting the independent parts of the whole, maintaining the separate variety which advances evolution best, now we can envision cooperative competition in evolution, as we gradually evolve beyond the human sub-species toward Godhood.

The Twofold Path brings together inward traditional religion with outward material-supermaterial evolution. The Twofold Path offers conservatism and synthesis to religion and science, and allows the new to work along with the old, without the damage of revolution, and most importantly offers the divine evolutionary path to real Godhood.

I did not erect theological materialism on the ruins of Christianity, as modern thinkers did with science and the humanities, I wanted to renew the religious building, not tear it down. This rebirth was done through the Twofold Path, where the God-Within, the Father-Within, is seen as the first glimpse, or the mirror of the Godhood reached through material and supermaterial evolution. But this was a revelatory insight and not done simply to retain Christianity, and not done because I in fact do respect the conservative thinkers who see the great value for life in traditions.

Early Nietzsche could not see his way out of the loss of both religion and science other than through the rebirth of art-myth as a guide to truth, along with creating individual great men as the goal of culture. Nietzsche thought that this loss of myth was the result of the reasoning of Socrates which supposedly destroyed myth, and also after the “historical sense” and the abstract pursuit of knowledge for knowledge sake in modern times further destroyed myth and religion. Kant helped this destruction along by showing the limits of knowledge, and Schopenhauer by adding the Will as the superior force to all knowledge.

Theological materialism and the Theoevolutionary Church can revive both religion and science after modern life could not retrieve them as a satisfactory guide to truth. This brings along the religious-cultural goal of evolving increasingly great men, and also the sacred goal of attaining real Godhood in evolution in the Outward Path, the God first seen and mirrored in the Inward Path of the great religions.”

How the West is increasingly lost to the foundation of real human nature and human behavior

We all, whether we know it or not, left and right, follow the directive of the biological origin of social behavior. But the left is more lost from this foundation than the right, because many on the left---but even some on the right---consider the biological origin of social behavior an evil idea, which really means that they think human nature and human behavior are evil.

The Marxist change in direction of modern Western culture does not follow the prompting of the biological origin of human social behavior and believes instead that nurturing and the environment alone account for human behavior. Never the less they are driven by the same biological origin of social behavior seen in their biological wills to power.

Here is a pithy quote from the great sociobiologist Edward O. Wilson: “I see no way out of the problems that...tribalism creates other than humans just becoming more honest and fully aware of themselves....The genes hold culture on a leash. The leash is very long, but inevitably values will be constrained in accordance with their effects on the human gene pool. The brain is a product of evolution. Human behavior . .is the circuitous technique by which human genetic material has been and will be kept intact. Morality has no other demonstrable ultimate function."

An ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups is merely applied biology. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc. An ethnopluralism of ethnostates could be established, legally, in the United States with our constitutional separation of powers and states.

Both the left and the right fall apart in their ultimate answers to racism

Charles Murray can't be accused of cowardliness in his work on the biological origin of intelligence, but neither can the Marxist Black Lives Matter movement in affirming that there can be racism behind human behavior. But both fall apart in their ultimate answers to racism.

Charles Murray believes American individualism is the answer to racism or group-selection, and the Black Lives Matter movement believe that only whites can be racist or group-selecting.

Charles Darwin himself argued for group selection believing that tribes of moral men “have an immense advantage” over "fractious bands of pirates''. E. O. Wilson of Harvard University (the father of sociobiology) and David Sloan Wilson (no relation) of Binghamton University affirm group selection, although selection takes place on multiple levels simultaneously. This can be summed up in the pithy comment: “Selfishness beats altruism within groups. Altruistic groups beat selfish groups.”

The biological origin of social behavior which came with Darwin and later sociobiology shows that real human nature is and has been genetically kin and ethnic centered (ie. racist and ethnocentric) with group selection as the main unit of successful survival and reproduction, followed by individual selection. America has not successfully united different races and ethnic groups, we are naturally fragmenting into a nation of competing races in a zero game where the gains of one ethnic group is offset by the losses of another ethnic group, with much cruel social discord in the process. But all is not lost.

We need to gradually realize the reality that multicultural multi-ethnic societies just don't work. The twenty first century could be the century of the rise of ethnostatism. As one historian put it, what formerly divided us can put us back together again. It would be far more realistic to talk of un-assimilating differences rather than about superiority/inferiority. A true natural rights or civil rights movement would promote ethnostates and an ethnopluralism of ethnostates for all groups, black, white, brown, yellow, or red, with each ethnostate protected from marauding imperialists, global businesses, supremacists, Marxists, etc.