The supreme principle of the evolution of life toward Godhood

Natural evolution works along with the activation from within life (Tirips) toward evolving to Godhood which also is the zenith of successful survival and reproduction. This adds a sacred goal to the theory of a random and goalless Darwinian evolution. The will to Godhood or Tirips is seen as an obstacle which both science and traditional religion oppose. So far anyone who proposes it is called a fool by science, or Satan by religionists (I have been called both).

Natural law creates order between man and nature, but this means we need to know or understand natural law to be in harmony with it. Traditional religion, but also science, need deeper knowledge of the natural world, which has advanced since the time of Aquinas, specifically, knowledge of the natural evolution toward Godhood and its religious implications.

Theological materialism recognizes the supreme principle of evolution in nature and the cosmos, which is that material evolution can take us to the object or objects of supermaterial Godhood. That is a transformation of the inward God first spoken about or identified in traditional religion.

Theological materialism adds the Evolutionary Outward Path of sacred material evolution to the traditional Involutionary Inward Path of traditional religion. This is the Twofold Path of theological materialism and the projected Theoevolutionary Church, which is a conservative transformation while keeping the best of the past.

Communities of humanity will one day be in harmony with the natural law of this supreme principle of the evolution of life toward Godhood. Man's downfall has been moving away from it or never understanding it.

The natural sequence of genetic altruistic priorities in real human nature

This is the gradation or hierarchy of altruism, from the strongest to the weakest interest in being-for-others : individual, kin, ethnic group, region, state, nation, world, universe, all driven by the biological activation of life to survival and reproductive success, but also driven by the biological activation within life to evolve toward Godhood that must work along with the ups and downs of natural outside evolution. That is the natural sequence of the genetic priorities of real human nature in theological materialism.

When political philosophy synchronizes with this biological origin of our social behavior then we can have the variety and independence of decentralized regions and states or ethnostates with light federal systems protecting all.

When this philosophy is bonded in a religion dedicated to life materially evolving to supermaterial Godhood then we will be approaching a whole, complete, long-lasting, and modern worldview.

But human beings tend to be more a scheming, power-seeking, species than a wise species and long-term religions and philosophies are often blocked or overturned by short-term selfish people, so, of course, work and persistence are needed to bring the natural sequence of genetic altruistic priorities forward out of the various blockades against it.

French president Emmanuel Macron made a dig at the nationalism of President Trump

That little weasel French president Emmanuel Macron made a dig at the nationalism of President Trump at the Veterans Day ceremony in Paris, as well as being a slur at the populist nationalism rising in his own country, which shows how far these betrayers of their own people will go in support of the elite of globalism, who have economically and militarily rampaged across all borders in the world. Stalin and Hitler, who the globalist's compare the nationalists to, would have done the same thing if they hadn't been stopped, so who really are the nationalists?

Globalism and multiculturalism were bogus frauds promoted by both communism and global capitalism, which destroyed nations and borders in order to make a few globalists and weasel hangers on like Macron rich. They will sometimes admit that nationalism means sharing the same culture, history and language but they don't have the balls to admit that nationalism is a process by which nationalities, races and ethnic groups are transferred into political units.

Well, I think these deceivers and swindlers do seem to be going down at the hands of populist nationalism, which will have to try to pick up the pieces of their nations and put them back together again. One hopes one day we will have an ethnopluralism of ethnostates in line with real human nature, for all nations---that will be a global world worth celebrating.

Why the re-dawning of tribalism and racism on the right and the left?

When conservatives talk about how cultural Marxism has destroyed us, they usually don't mention that it has also advanced those who promoted cultural Marxism, who were often minorities who used cultural Marxism as their will to power.

It was relatively easy to push the more conservative or at least traditional liberal academics aside because academics often come from a pool of nerds who did well academically but not so well on the rough and tumble playgrounds where many of the cultural Marxist's came from.

Many conservatives don't want to see that the reason this dynamic cultural change has turned into tribalism and racism is not because tribalism and racism are evil but because tribalism and racism are a deep part of real human nature, which we inherited from our hunter/gatherer ancestors.

Human nature is flexible enough to be able to deny its own nature for a time before is pulled back as if on a genetic leash to its inherent ethnocentrism. We see the charge of evil racism hurled by people who are pushing their own racism. Ain't humans something?

This explains the re-dawning of tribalism and racism on the right and the left, and it is suicidal and weak-minded for either side to deny it.

Writing style and character in displaying reality

Some writers feel that the first draft is for themselves and the second is for the public, but that can be where style gets in the way of substance or truth. When Baudelaire says, “always be a poet, even in prose” reality can more easily fly away in a glut of metaphors. Personally, in my zeal to be honest I make too many grammatical mistakes.

Personalities work that way too, social personas can get in the way of honesty and courage; carried too far it creates phonies. But social interactions are usually oiled by polite lies, without which people might be at each others throats. And people like to be amused rather than dwell on uncomfortable truths after a hard day in the swamps.

Reality and truth can often be unpleasant, especially if the very base of grammar and style contains lies about reality---many truths were unknown when grammar developed. Science too has its own nerdish style of writing and defining the truth and often misses communications skills. (sociobiologist E. O. Wilson is an exception). And many philosophers sail away from reality on the wings of pedagogery.

I find that courage and truth can appear at any caste or education level, the strait-talking longshoremen or farmer often speak more truths than the PhD. It could be that ones reality and ones style is an inherent character trait.

Very few writers had both great style yet reveal many truths about reality. It's a small group. For me Shakespeare and Nietzsche come to mind.

Can we advance politically beyond resentment and revenge?

Middlemen, merchants etc, often don't like warriors because they think warrior societies tend to create masters/slave relationships, but then middlemen and merchants go on to create master/slave relationships between creditors and debtors, often with feelings of resentment and revenge, as Nietzsche pointed out.

But it seems that those feelings of resentment and revenge in both warriors and merchants gradually fade the more powerful they become, then mercy and philanthropy enter their world. Power doesn't corrupt everything.

It seems to me that the same sort of mercy and philanthropy happens when we move from marauding imperialism and selfish racial supremacy to affirming ethnostates and ethnopluralism, where credence is given to the deep ethnocentric and nationalist instincts of all distinctive groups, based on the biological or genetic origin of these things in real human nature.

I believe that ethnostates and ethnopluralism are the most realistic way to obtain the most peace and social harmony for human beings with the most possible mercy and philanthropy, and with the least resentment and revenge, given that human nature remains kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

I think of Billy Holiday singing "God bless the child that's got its own."

Corrupting and repairing Nietzsche

Almost every modern philosopher runs away from connecting Nietzsche's will-to-power to biology and I think that's a mistake. The other mistake is in tying to make the will-to-power only about self-mastery, which seems to be mainly a reaction to the Nazis and World War Two.

But thinking a little deeper, when the will-to-power is connected to biology it ultimately leads to altruism, being-for-others, which is the foundation of religious ethics. Group-selection was more successful than selfish individualism in survival and reproduction and so altruism was inherited in the human gene pool and remains with us today.

The will-to-power also needs to be connected to natural evolution. Evolution and natural selection are an outside force working to adapt individual wills to power to the environment that they are trying to survive in, so the will-to-power doesn't work or shape life unhindered.

But evolution and natural selection connected to the will-to-power don't lead to imperial dominance of one group over all the others because, as we saw with Hitler, the whole world gangs up on and destroys the imperial dominance of one group over all the others. When man was still a beast that sort of imperial dominance often applied but not since the world became crowded with different ethnic groups all seeking their own ethnostates.

I go even further and change the will-to-power to the will-to-Godhood, or Tirips, which is a material activation within material life with the definite direction of evolving toward Godhood, which is the always sought-after zenith of success in survival and reproduction, but never ending, since evolution always continues on, sometimes going sideways or backward yet always upward toward the object or objects of supermaterial Godhood.

Power and happiness and even survival and reproduction then become secondary goals or reactions to the deeper primal agency or activation of material life to evolve to supermaterial Godhood, and there is no honest need to reject that definition of Godhood and religion.

Pre-election condemnation of the media and the corrupted culture

Roman emperors never had the kind of power the Big Media has to reach every person in the empire at the same time, to sell them things, mollify them, corrupt them with "the news," biased entertainment, comedies, dramas, which are all leftist and dummed-down to reach the largest number of people. It's Ancient Rome all over again with the great spectacles---Sunday night football with the gladiators battling is more fun than worrying about politics, I watch it too. Soviet propaganda was not even close to being as successful as the Western media has been in brainwashing the public, with solid help from the entire academic world from kindergarten to graduate school. But these are new kind of emperors and new kind of empires.

"Success" in business and success in the cultural world has become the politically correct way not to talk about the drive to success in the survival and reproduction of the owners and operators of the culture and the media. The deepest cause of this great corruption comes down to biology or the biological origin of social behavior, that is, the will to power or the drive to success of the survival and reproduction of the owners and operators of the culture and the media, who have said to hell with everyone else.

So now we have a big election tomorrow with the conservative side dominated by President Trump and the Trumpians, with the entire Big Media and the Establishment (other than the neoconservative Fox News) against them. The Trumpians may or may not dominate the next government, but the demographic trends are against them. As an evolutionary conservative I believe these new corrupt media empires and sleazy emperors need to be broken up into smaller units with many owners, just as our multicultural, multiracial, unworkable nation needs to be broken up into smaller units in an ethnopluralism of ethnostates. But that's for another election in even more desperate times.

We could rejuvenate our republic

We could rejuvenate our republic, we could weaken the love affair with pure democracy which has led to mob rule and reemphasize the federalist aspect of the Electoral College where representatives elected by the people ultimately vote for the president not the people directly, and we could reject the 17th amendment and the popular election of United States Senators by the people of the states and bring back senators being elected by elected state legislatures.

Even more importantly we could not only reaffirm the 10th amendment where "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people," but we could add more power to the healthy separation of powers and states or regions toward becoming ethnostates, so that we could end up with an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

That is the best political/cultural configuration to harmonize with real human nature, because in spite of the propaganda of modern liberalism and cultural Marxism, human nature remains kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

That is the legal and non-violent way to save the United States. Will we make those changes? Do people get the government they deserve? If we say no we won't or we can't rejuvenate our republic, we energize fascism or communism, which don't much concern themselves with being legal or non-violent and prefer to just kick down the door.

The materialization of the spirit in our evolution toward Godhood

The powerful effect of recognizing the activation of material evolution steadily moving toward higher consciousness and complexity, with stops and sideways-going along the way from environmental natural selection, while always moving toward the zenith of success in survival and reproduction, and leading logically and instinctively toward Godhood, means that we need worry less about sublimating or "spiritualizing" the instincts because the very base or foundation of the instincts seeks Godhood.

This does not mean that unreasoning or ignorance advance, and it doesn't mean that we don't need to be an aid our evolution toward Godhood; it means we can untangle ourselves from the blockade of over-intellualization and pedantry, and from the ascetic blockade of all material desires. We can apply the sophisticated evolutionary sciences and the rational but still harmonious material sublimation of the instincts as aids in our upward evolution.

I see evolution moving inevitably in a pattern, even though it has its random elements, and the pattern has a discernible direction, in spite of instances of stagnation and retreat, toward “higher and higher more effective living forms,”as Cattell put it. The goal of evolving to Godhood need not deprive us of either science or religion. Defining life as internally and materially activated (Tirips) toward evolving to higher and higher forms and eventually to Godhood, shaped by natural outside evolution, may be a bit further than some want to go, but I think such a drive and direction needs to be acknowledged by science and religion.

What this is is the materialization of the "spirit" (Tirips) in our evolution toward Godhood. That is also the deeper meaning of the term Civilizing the Beast---and the "beast" is not Satan, though some have sanctimoniously confounded it, and me, as that (what a dove-like way to make a guy feel wanted.)

Is the spiritual or material view of the world reductionist?

Religious philosophers have been telling us for centuries that materialism is a dismal reductionist view of the world. Although reductionism can be a good thing, it is they who are reductionist in defining God as a spiritual and non-material God rather than the real, ordered, intelligible and material/supermaterial Godhood, evolved to in the material and supermaterial world, which is not a "dismal" world but a lucid and wonderful world.

The Godhood evolved to in the natural material world does not need to reject or block the material world or material desires, but it needs to apply real, ordered, intelligible, instincts and thinking to the path to Godhood, which includes rather than rejects science---such as the evolutionary sciences.

The theological materialist view of religion can even affirm conservatism in retaining traditional religion and Godhood while transforming it: the Inward Path to the "spiritual" God-Within featured in traditional religion leads to the Outward Path of material evolution to the supermaterial being, or beings, of real Godhood.

How altruism and morality does and does not falsify nature

The big error regarding altruism, which even Nietzsche made, was in how altruism and morality does and does not falsify nature. Altruism runs on a gradation from self to kin to ethnic group and weakens as it moves out toward the universalism of religions and political philosophies. Group-selection is the main unit of successful selection followed by individual selection. As E. O. Wilson put it: "Within groups, selfish individuals beat altruistic individuals, but groups of altruists beat groups of selfish individuals."

That is the hierarchy of altruism which invalidates the selfish theories of Nietzsche, Ayn Rand, and her libertarian followers. Selfishness in individuals only works well until an altruistic kin/ethnic-group comes along and overcomes them. That is how we ended up with genes selected that developed a human nature which is kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection.

Culture and politics can be judged as falsifying nature or not falsifying nature from this sociobiological perspective. Ethnostates and ethnopluralism look good when the biological origin of our social behavior is included and not left out as it largely is in modern liberalism, cultural Marxism, and libertarianism.

How can we limit the lying promoters of modern liberalism and cultural Marxism?

People will always lie, but President Trump is right to call out the fake or lying news. But lying goes way back to ancient differences between castes; warriors were taught not to lie, but merchants not so much, because lying about how much ammunition remained could kill a lot of men, whereas lying about the price of products could merely cheat people.

As warrior societies retreated and merchant societies expanded so did the lies. So we now have the lying Big Media, movies, television, newspapers and of course the lying internet. But deeper than that we have academics who have legitimized lying; post-moderns like Derrida, Foucault, Lyotard, and their lesser American followers, have created what amounts to an elaborate defense of lies by claiming the relativity of truth where only power can decide the difference.

So what can we do about it? Go back to warrior societies? Punish the merchants? Break up the Big Media liars? March through the academies? We have jammed different ethnic/racial groups together in the same living space due to, you guessed it, the lies of multiculturalism, yet still we have people who are naturally or genetically more beholden to their own kin and ethnic group than other groups, so natural competition between groups multiplies the lying.

Developing ethnostates and ethnopluralism within our constitutional separation of powers and states would limit the lies and help solve many of the modern problems we have, such as our increasing alienation, or the civil strife leading to civil war, etc, which the lying promoters of modern liberalism and cultural Marxism have caused.

If we were a healthy country we would stop all immigration, legal and illegal, for a good amount of time

It is already suicidal to accept one million legal immigrants into the United States a year, as we now do, so accepting illegal immigration is idiotic. But immigration policies have not been merely suicidal and idiotic they has been engineered by Big Business---due to flat greed, the Democrats---seeking voting power, and the Media---seeking the destruction of traditional America and Euro-Americans and a Marxist culture run by them.

If we were a healthy country we would stop all immigration, legal and illegal, for a good amount of time, and then choose only immigrants who are able to not only homogeneously integrate into the U.S. but bring something useful to the country.

Will we do that? I hate to be pessimistic, but if we don't, or if we can't, we will surely fall as Rome fell. The eventual solution may be to accept reality and legally split into an ethnopluralism of ethnostates.

The hierarchy of activations: where is the self located?

I agree with Nietzsche in not wanting to locate the self in the ego. I also don't want to locate the primary goal of life in survival and reproductive success, or in happiness, vital as they are. These things are located within a hierarchy of activation in the same way that pleasure from eating food is not the goal but the means to survival, and as survival is not the end-goal but the means to evolve further toward the zenith of survival and reproductive success, which is Godhood.

The self or executive function therefore seems to be located in the material activation to supermaterial Godhood. That sacred material activation (Tirips) then survives within the give and take of outside natural selection and evolution.

This hierarchy of functions is then integrated in healthy individuals and societies. Action leads contemplation in this hierarchy of activations, not the other way around. And the self is not the non-material spiritual goal of the religious/philosophical ascetics.

The political or religious fantasy of all people being the same and all getting along in the same space simply does not work

Racist attacks will continue in a multi-racial/multi-ethic societies because human nature is racist and ethnocentric and has been since humans became humans, and even before that; it was genetically programmed into human nature because that kind of group-solidity helped humans survive and reproduce successfully in a very tough world. No amount of political propaganda against it has stopped it, not even religion has stopped it (some religions even encourage it).  

That is why ethnostates and ethnopluralism is advocated. You cannot jam different racial/ethnic groups together in the same space and expect them to get along, even if human nature is flexible enough to try to do it in a perfunctory way for a short time (or is forced to do it).  Calling it evil has not and will not stop it.  Multi-racial/multi-ethic programs, like Soviet communism---and now cultural Marxism in the U. S.---always soon break back down into ethnostates. In any case, racial/ethnic groups usually move to their own ethnic neighborhoods where they feel more in harmony no matter what they are told in the Media or in school.

The political or religious fantasy of all people being the same and all getting along in the same space simply does not work, and it is long overdo time to admit it. That is why ethnostates and ethnopluralism is advocated, which could even be adapted to the constitutional separation of powers and states in the U. S., and federally protected. If we really want peace and harmony that is the best we can do.

To what extent is judgment life-promoting?

" The question is to what extent is judgment life-promoting, life-preserving, species preserving, perhaps species cultivating." (Nietzsche, BGE)

The perspective in Nietzsche's statement uncomplicates the clutter of philosophy regarding human behavior, the self, and others. Life simply seeks to live but also to continually evolve to higher life. Look at philosophy and psychology from this perspective and you are on the way to personal and social health. Then we can ask the question, what is the best political structure, best art, etc.?

The Nietzsche quotation harmonizes well with the science of sociobiology and its affirmation of the biological origin of social behavior. Marxism, socialism, capitalism, fascism, ect, need to be seen in light of the political/social structure of ethnostates and ethnopluralism, which offer the best and most natural kind of life-promoting, life-preserving, species preserving, and species cultivating, for all groups.

Add to that a religion of evolution, as seen in theological materialism, and you are good to go.

Decentralism As Ethnopluralism (from 2014)

Defending decentralism to help preserve ethic conclaves and regions must never be mistaken for Jim Crow “states rights” regionalism, which gravely hurt the decentralist cause. Ethnic groups are simply different, with various talents which were mentally and physically adapted to the different geographical regions that they evolved within. Decentralism is meant to preserve and elevate ethnic cultures, and not to have one group dominate another.

The Ethnopluralism Hypothesis affirms a decentralized America (and other parts of the world too for that matter) with states and regions as ethnic conclaves, which can be accommodated by the originally decentralizing U.S. Constitution. The national experiment to homogenize different ethnic groups into one motley mishmash has not worked, accept for very close cousin ethnic groups the melting pot didn't melt. This is why multiculturalism began to be promoted, which also didn't work, because all groups were expected to live close together and just “get along”, which they have not done, and will not do.

Throughout human history up to the present time human nature has remained kin-centered, gender defined, age-grading, heterosexual marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, among other traditional things, with group-selection as the primary unit of selection. Human nature generally prefers its own kind and its own cultures, and that needs to be championed not made into something evil.

But there are numerous non- ethnic reasons to support decentralism, as pointed out by Jeff Taylor in his book “Politics of Human Scale,” reviewed by Gerald Russello in the April “Chronicles.” Federalism means “minimalistic government at every level,” broader than the division between national and state governments. “Having many points of power reduces the malevolent reach of any of them.”  This also is the ideal environment for real evolution with variety to take place.

But the centralizing impulses always rise, even among those who promote individual freedom---they end up using big government power to uniformly enforce individualism, when individualism in fact does not trump the central unit of group selection.

Capitalism can be thought of as “the least bad system” because it conforms to real human nature, that is, not man's “sinful nature,” as many conservatives define human nature, but real human nature in the natural world seeking success in survival and reproduction. Decentralism can allow capitalism to continue raising the standard of living for all, as it has done, but it needs to be free of its centralizing and monopolizing impulses, just as big government needs to be.

In great civilizations culture is virtually synonymous with religion, but both culture and religion are developed by various ethnic groups which give them their own special traits. The religion of the future is a religion that affirms human evolution in the Outward Path toward the Godhood (the Father Within) first only symbolically experienced in the Inward Path of traditional religions. We are all evolving toward Godhood with the variety that evolution has always preferred, and we are certainly capable of cooperative competition in this great adventure and mission.

If we begin with the line "the conquest of the United States by...." what words finish that line?

The conquest of the United States by Mexican immigrants? The Israeli-Saudi lobbies? Beneath those powerful triumphs, and ruling them, is what Srdja Trifkovic called the "duopolistic, neolib-neocon system of full-spectrum global dominance."

That dominance has led to the over-replacement level births of non-whites due mainly to welfare largess promoted by the neolib side of the neolib-neocon ruling system. And that in turn has led to the demographic dominance of the Democratic Party who now can control the county, if they vote, which was one of the main reasons why the neolib-neocon's prompted their policies of open borders and multicultural-multiracialism within the U.S.

The other deeper reason activating the neolib-neocon system of full-spectrum global dominance was the natural will to power of the elites within the neolib-neocon system, many of whom are also loyal to countries outside the U.S.---such as the Israeli-Saudi lobbies who influence our foreign policy.

Even if conservative's rally once more with President Trump, the demographic dominance of the Democratic Party will control the culture from now on, and that means the end of traditional conservative governments in the U.S.  So we better think about how nearly half of the country who do not support the neolib-neocon system will survive, given their cultural demoralization and their under-replacement level of births.

To repeat what I wrote yesterday, the biological origin of our social behavior can rise out of our deterioration---assuming we don't destroy ourselves first. I think we will eventually again create the political/cultural structure of ethnostates and ethnopluralism, federally protected, adapted to the constitutional separation of powers and states, which is the political/cultural solution most in harmony with real human nature, and the way out of our slow but rising death.

Who do we blame for the distressed state of America and what can we do about it?

The most blame probably goes to global corporations who are devoted to greed and care virtually nothing about national borders (and they influence governments not to care either), the Big Media in all its forms and affiliations who when they are not simply immoral are cultural Marxists, the academic world who have propagandized the public from kindergarten to grad school to be the same hedonistic Marxists, and unelected deep-state bureaucrats who reflect all of the traits mentioned above.

Those are the people who have championed all the causes that have destroyed traditional American culture. As they went about opening all borders, one way or another, to create their multicultural/multiracial world were they ignorant of the fact that as the people in a culture change the culture changes, or not so much ignorant of what they were destroying as they were just plain greedy, hedonistic, and half-baked fantasizers? Name them, and we name the destroyers. In any case American culture changed and will never return to what it was.  Is it all over for America as we have known it? Yes, because the people have changed due to massive legal and now illegal immigration, and so the culture has changed.

But human nature remains as it always has been. Beneath the present decadence we remain kin-centered, gender defined, age-graded, heterosexual, marriage-making, hierarchical, ethnocentric, even xenophobic, and religious-making, among other conservative things, with group-selection as the primary unit of successful selection, followed by individual selection. The defense of real human nature affirms in general the populist nationalism now trying to rise in the corrupted West: we should vote for that cause November 6th.

The biological origin of social behavior can rise and will rise out of our decadence and decay---assuming we don't destroy ourselves first. I think we will eventually again create the political/cultural structure of ethnostates and ethnopluralism, federally protected, which is the political/cultural solution most in harmony with real human nature. The biological origin of our social behavior will eventually end the intellectual defense of cultural Marxism and our postmodern relativistic rot.